Kremer Heiner, Gebauer Julian, Elvers-Hornung Susanne, Uhlig Stefanie, Hammes Hans-Peter, Beltramo Elena, Steeb Lothar, Harmsen Martin C, Sticht Carsten, Klueter Harald, Bieback Karen, Fiori Agnese
Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
German Red Cross Blood Donation Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessen, Mannheim, Germany.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Jun 9;8:387. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00387. eCollection 2020.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a frequent diabetes-associated complication. Pericyte dropout can cause increased vascular permeability and contribute to vascular occlusion. Adipose-derived stromal cells (ASC) have been suggested to replace pericytes and restore microvascular support as potential therapy of DR. In models of DR, ASC not only generated a cytoprotective and reparative environment by the secretion of trophic factors but also engrafted and integrated into the retina in a pericyte-like fashion. The aim of this study was to compare the pro-angiogenic features of human ASC and human retinal microvascular pericytes (HRMVPC) . The proliferation and the expression of ASC and HRMVPC markers were compared. Adhesion to high glucose-conditioned endothelial extracellular matrix, mimicking the diabetic microenvironment, was measured. The angiogenesis-promoting features of both cell types and their conditioned media on human retinal endothelial cells (EC) were assessed. To identify a molecular basis for the observed differences, gene expression profiling was performed using whole-genome microarrays, and data were validated using PCR arrays and flow cytometry. Based on multiplex cytokine results, functional studies on selected growth factors were performed to assess their role in angiogenic support. Despite a distinct heterogeneity in ASC and HRMVPC cultures with an overlap of expressed markers, ASC differed functionally from HRMVPC. Most importantly, the pro-angiogenic activity was solely featured by ASC, whereas HRMVPC actively suppressed vascular network formation. HRMVPC, in contrast to ASC, showed impaired adhesion and proliferation on the high glucose-conditioned endothelial extracellular matrix. These data were supported by gene expression profiles with differentially expressed genes. The vessel-stabilizing factors were more highly expressed in HRMVPC, and the angiogenesis-promoting factors were more highly expressed in ASC. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibition efficiently abolished the ASC angiogenic supportive capacities, whereas the addition of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 did not alter these effects. Our results clearly show that ASC are pro-angiogenic, whereas HRMVPC are marked by anti-angiogenic/EC-stabilizing features. These data support ASC as pericyte replacement in DR but also suggest a careful risk-to-benefit analysis to take full advantage of the ASC therapeutic features.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是一种常见的糖尿病相关并发症。周细胞丢失可导致血管通透性增加并促成血管闭塞。脂肪来源的基质细胞(ASC)已被提议作为DR的潜在治疗方法来替代周细胞并恢复微血管支持。在DR模型中,ASC不仅通过分泌营养因子产生细胞保护和修复环境,还以周细胞样方式植入并整合到视网膜中。本研究的目的是比较人ASC和人视网膜微血管周细胞(HRMVPC)的促血管生成特征。比较了ASC和HRMVPC标志物的增殖和表达情况。检测了对模拟糖尿病微环境的高糖条件下内皮细胞外基质的黏附情况。评估了两种细胞类型及其条件培养基对人视网膜内皮细胞(EC)的促血管生成特征。为了确定观察到的差异的分子基础,使用全基因组微阵列进行基因表达谱分析,并使用PCR阵列和流式细胞术对数据进行验证。基于多重细胞因子结果,对选定的生长因子进行功能研究以评估它们在血管生成支持中的作用。尽管ASC和HRMVPC培养物存在明显的异质性且表达的标志物有重叠,但ASC在功能上与HRMVPC不同。最重要的是,促血管生成活性仅由ASC表现出来,而HRMVPC则积极抑制血管网络形成。与ASC相比,HRMVPC在高糖条件下内皮细胞外基质上的黏附和增殖受损。这些数据得到了具有差异表达基因的基因表达谱的支持。血管稳定因子在HRMVPC中表达更高,而促血管生成因子在ASC中表达更高。血管内皮生长因子受体-2抑制有效消除了ASC的血管生成支持能力,而添加血管生成素-1和血管生成素-2并未改变这些作用。我们的结果清楚地表明,ASC具有促血管生成作用,而HRMVPC具有抗血管生成/内皮细胞稳定特征。这些数据支持将ASC作为DR中周细胞替代物,但也建议进行仔细的风险效益分析以充分利用ASC的治疗特征。