• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期5年的随机试验表明,一个支持力度逐步增加的集中式邮寄项目可提高结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。

A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.

作者信息

Green Beverly B, Anderson Melissa L, Cook Andrea J, Chubak Jessica, Fuller Sharon, Meenan Richard T, Vernon Sally W

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4472-4480. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30908. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30908
PMID:28753230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5673524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening over many years is required to optimize reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. However, no prior trials have compared strategies for obtaining long-term adherence.

METHODS

Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up was implemented in an integrated health care organization in Washington State. Between 2008 and 2009, 4675 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomized to receive the usual care (UC), which included clinic-based strategies to increase CRC screening (arm 1), or, in years 1 and 2, mailings with a call-in number for colonoscopy and mailed fecal tests (arm 2), mailings plus brief telephone assistance (arm 3), or mailings and assistance plus nurse navigation (arm 4). Active-intervention subjects (those in arms 2, 3, and 4 combined) who were still eligible for CRC screening were randomized to mailings being stopped or continued in years 3 and 5. The time in compliance with CRC screening over 5 years was compared for persons assigned to any intervention and persons assigned to UC. Screening tests contributed time on the basis of national guidelines for screening intervals (fecal tests annually, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years).

RESULTS

All participants contributed data, but they were censored at disenrollment, death, the age of 76 years, or a diagnosis of CRC. Compared with UC participants, intervention participants had 31% more adjusted covered time over 5 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.37; covered time, 47.5% vs 62.1%). Fecal testing accounted for almost all additional covered time.

CONCLUSIONS

In a health care organization with clinic-based activities to increase CRC screening, a centralized program led to increased CRC screening adherence over 5 years. Longer term data on screening adherence and its impact on CRC outcomes are needed. Cancer 2017;123:4472-80. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

需要多年的筛查才能优化降低结直肠癌(CRC)死亡率。然而,之前尚无试验比较获得长期依从性的策略。

方法

在华盛顿州的一个综合医疗保健机构实施了增加结直肠癌筛查及随访支持系统。2008年至2009年期间,4675名年龄在50至74岁之间的个体被随机分配接受常规护理(UC),其中包括基于诊所的增加CRC筛查的策略(第1组),或者在第1年和第2年,邮寄带有结肠镜检查热线电话的信件以及邮寄粪便检测(第2组),邮寄信件加简短电话协助(第3组),或邮寄信件、协助加护士导航(第4组)。仍符合CRC筛查条件的积极干预受试者(第2、3和4组合组)在第3年和第5年被随机分配停止或继续邮寄信件。比较了分配到任何干预措施的人与分配到UC的人在5年内符合CRC筛查的时间。筛查测试根据国家筛查间隔指南(每年进行粪便检测,每5年进行乙状结肠镜检查,每10年进行结肠镜检查)计算时间。

结果

所有参与者都提供了数据,但在退出、死亡、76岁或被诊断为CRC时被审查。与UC参与者相比,干预参与者在5年内的调整后覆盖时间多31%(发病率比,1.31;95%置信区间,1.25 - 1.37;覆盖时间,47.5%对62.1%)。粪便检测几乎占了所有额外的覆盖时间。

结论

在一个有基于诊所活动以增加CRC筛查的医疗保健机构中,一个集中化项目导致5年内CRC筛查依从性增加。需要关于筛查依从性及其对CRC结局影响的更长期数据。《癌症》2017年;123:4472 - 4480。©2017美国癌症协会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8057/5673524/f506c193bda6/nihms892270f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8057/5673524/3aa3051bf7f0/nihms892270f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8057/5673524/f506c193bda6/nihms892270f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8057/5673524/3aa3051bf7f0/nihms892270f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8057/5673524/f506c193bda6/nihms892270f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.一项为期5年的随机试验表明,一个支持力度逐步增加的集中式邮寄项目可提高结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4472-4480. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30908. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
2
A Centralized Program with Stepped Support Increases Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 9 Years: a Randomized Trial.集中式计划加阶梯式支持可提高结直肠癌筛查的 9 年依从性:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1073-1080. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06922-2. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.一项采用逐步增加支持的自动化干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002.
4
Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.以患者为中心的医疗之家持续邮寄粪便检测的影响:增加结肠癌筛查与随访支持系统随机试验的第3年
Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):312-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29734. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.支持系统以提高结直肠癌筛查和随访率(SOS):试验参与者的设计、挑战和基线特征。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):589-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
6
Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.序贯或主动选择用于结直肠癌筛查推广的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10305.
7
The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.年轻人结直肠癌发病率上升对最佳筛查起始年龄的影响:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的 I 号微观模拟分析
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31543. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests.在接受多轮邮寄粪便检测后未进行及间歇性完成结直肠癌筛查的原因。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4458-6.
9
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
10
Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的患者及医生提醒:一项随机对照试验
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):364-71. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.564.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal retrospective study of real-world adherence to colorectal cancer screening before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国COVID-19大流行前后结直肠癌筛查实际依从性的纵向回顾性研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;3(1):e001734. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial.资源的战略性利用以增强联邦合格健康中心中糖尿病患者的结直肠癌筛查(SURE:CRC4D):一项混合 II 型有效性实施试验的方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02496-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM): Rationale for Study Design.结肠镜检查与粪便免疫化学检测对降低结直肠癌死亡率的比较研究(CONFIRM):研究设计原理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;112(11):1736-1746. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.286. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.2015年美国癌症筛查检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 3;66(8):201-206. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1.
3
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
行为干预对结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查采用率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1829-1840. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002478. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
4
Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies.使用5A框架进行结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素:对美国研究的系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 29;35:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Chasm between Public Perceptions and Epidemiological Data on Colorectal Cancer.公众认知与结直肠癌流行病学数据之间存在差距。
Gut Liver. 2023 May 15;17(3):449-455. doi: 10.5009/gnl220134. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion.COMPASS 研究:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验,旨在测试基于诊所的干预措施对告知患者结直肠癌筛查选择对筛查完成的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
An investigation of efficient nursing interventions in early diagnosis of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症早期诊断中有效护理干预措施的调查:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Aug;10(8):2964-2968. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2148_20. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
A Centralized Program with Stepped Support Increases Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 9 Years: a Randomized Trial.集中式计划加阶梯式支持可提高结直肠癌筛查的 9 年依从性:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1073-1080. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06922-2. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
A stepped randomized trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in a nationwide sample of U.S. Veterans.一项促进美国退伍军人全国样本结直肠癌筛查的阶梯式随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;105:106392. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106392. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
10
Variation in Colorectal Cancer Stage and Mortality across Large Community-Based Populations: PORTAL Colorectal Cancer Cohort.基于大型社区人群的结直肠癌分期和死亡率的变化:PORTAL 结直肠癌队列。
Perm J. 2020;24. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.182.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening.结直肠癌筛查的依从性:四轮基于粪便免疫化学检测的筛查
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):44-49. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.399. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌美国多学会专家组关于粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠肿瘤筛查的共识声明。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1217-1237.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
6
Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.种族/族裔与社区医疗系统中采用人群健康管理方法进行结直肠癌筛查
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1323-1330. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3792-1. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
7
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
8
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于人群的结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
9
Evidence-Based, Reality-Driven Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: The Critical Relationship of Adherence to Effectiveness.基于证据、以现实为导向的结直肠癌筛查指南:依从性与有效性的关键关系
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2065-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3377.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).接触以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)后,结直肠癌筛查率有所提高。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):191-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150290.