School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University Bundoora Australia, Bundoora, Australia.
Centre for Sport and Social Impact, La Trobe University Bundoora Australia, Bundoora, Australia.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234420. eCollection 2020.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the single item measure (SIM) to detect change in PA when compared to hip-worn accelerometry. A secondary aim was to provide further data on validity of the measure at a single time point.
Validity of the SIM to determine the number of days of ≥30 minutes of accelerometer-derived moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed in 120 participants (78% female, 19% male, 3% other; age: 46 ± 11 years). Analysis of change was based on change in the number of days that participants completed ≥30 minutes of MVPA determined by the SIM and accelerometry over two 7-day periods in 90 participants (age: 47±11 years). Accelerometer data were analysed as total minutes of MVPA per day (MVPA-total) and as sustained bouts of 10 minutes or more of MVPA (MVPA-bouts). Validity of the SIM to detect change in MVPA, using accelerometer data as the reference measurement, was examined through Spearman's correlation and agreement in classification of change between SIM and accelerometry. Responsiveness to change was assessed by standardised response means and Cohen's d.
Standardised response means for PA change were moderate for the SIM (0.77), MVPA-total (0.57) and MVPA-bouts (0.79). The correlation for change in number of days ≥30 minutes MVPA between the SIM and accelerometry were small to moderate (MVPA-total: r = 0.36 and MVP-bouts: r = 0.40). The SIM displayed moderate accuracy (60%-63%), using accelerometer data as the reference measurement, in detecting increases in days ≥30 minutes of MVPA.
The SIM is a potentially useful assessment tool for evaluating change in MVPA, particularly when device-based measures or longer self-report measures are not feasible.
本研究旨在评估单项测量(SIM)在检测 PA 变化方面的反应性,与髋部佩戴的加速度计相比。次要目的是在单个时间点提供该测量的进一步有效性数据。
在 120 名参与者(78%女性,19%男性,3%其他;年龄:46±11 岁)中,评估了 SIM 确定加速度计得出的中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)天数的有效性。分析基于参与者在两个 7 天期间通过 SIM 和加速度计完成≥30 分钟 MVPA 的天数变化。加速度计数据分别分析为每天的 MVPA 总分钟数(MVPA-total)和 10 分钟或更长时间的 MVPA 持续爆发(MVPA-bouts)。使用加速度计数据作为参考测量,通过 Spearman 相关系数和 SIM 与加速度计之间变化分类的一致性来检查 SIM 检测 MVPA 变化的有效性。通过标准化反应均值和 Cohen's d 来评估对变化的反应能力。
SIM 对 PA 变化的反应标准均值为中度(0.77),MVPA-total(0.57)和 MVPA-bouts(0.79)。SIM 和加速度计之间≥30 分钟 MVPA 天数变化的相关性为小到中度(MVPA-total:r = 0.36 和 MVP-bouts:r = 0.40)。SIM 以加速度计数据为参考测量,在检测≥30 分钟 MVPA 天数增加方面具有中等准确性(60%-63%)。
SIM 是评估 MVPA 变化的一种潜在有用的评估工具,特别是当设备测量或更长的自我报告测量不可行时。