• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估健康的社会决定因素对可避免的 30 天再入院或死亡预测模型的影响。

Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.

Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235064. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235064
PMID:32584879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7316307/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early hospital readmissions or deaths are key healthcare quality measures in pay-for-performance programs. Predictive models could identify patients at higher risk of readmission or death and target interventions. However, existing models usually do not incorporate social determinants of health (SDH) information, although this information is of great importance to address health disparities related to social risk factors. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission.

METHODS

We extracted electronic health record data for 19,941 hospital admissions between January 2015 and November 2017 at an academic medical center in New York City. We applied the Simplified HOSPITAL score model to predict potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death and examined if incorporating individual- and community-level SDH could improve the prediction using cross-validation. We calculated the C-statistic for discrimination, Brier score for accuracy, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration for each model using logistic regression. Analysis was conducted for all patients and three subgroups that may be disproportionately affected by social risk factors, namely Medicaid patients, patients who are 65 or older, and obese patients.

RESULTS

The Simplified HOSPITAL score model achieved similar performance in our sample compared to previous studies. Adding SDH did not improve the prediction among all patients. However, adding individual- and community-level SDH at the US census tract level significantly improved the prediction for all three subgroups. Specifically, C-statistics improved from 0.70 to 0.73 for Medicaid patients, from 0.66 to 0.68 for patients 65 or older, and from 0.70 to 0.73 for obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients from certain subgroups may be more likely to be affected by social risk factors. Incorporating SDH into predictive models may be helpful to identify these patients and reduce health disparities associated with vulnerable social conditions.

摘要

目的

医院早期再入院或死亡是按绩效付费计划中的关键医疗质量指标。预测模型可以识别再入院或死亡风险较高的患者,并针对这些患者进行干预。然而,现有的模型通常不包含健康的社会决定因素(social determinants of health,SDH)信息,尽管这些信息对于解决与社会风险因素相关的健康差异非常重要。本研究的目的是检验健康的社会决定因素对预测模型在预测可避免的 30 天再入院方面的影响。

方法

我们从纽约市一所学术医疗中心 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 11 月期间的 19941 例住院记录中提取了电子健康记录数据。我们应用简化 HOSPITAL 评分模型来预测可避免的 30 天再入院或死亡,并通过交叉验证检验纳入个体和社区层面的健康的社会决定因素是否可以提高预测效果。我们使用逻辑回归计算了每个模型的判别 C 统计量、准确性的 Brier 评分和校准的 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验。分析包括所有患者和三个可能受到社会风险因素不成比例影响的亚组,即医疗补助计划患者、65 岁或以上的患者和肥胖患者。

结果

简化 HOSPITAL 评分模型在我们的样本中与之前的研究相比表现相似。添加健康的社会决定因素并不能提高所有患者的预测效果。然而,在使用美国人口普查区层面的个体和社区层面健康的社会决定因素时,所有三个亚组的预测效果都得到了显著提高。具体来说,医疗补助计划患者的 C 统计量从 0.70 提高到 0.73,65 岁或以上患者的 C 统计量从 0.66 提高到 0.68,肥胖患者的 C 统计量从 0.70 提高到 0.73。

结论

某些亚组的患者可能更容易受到社会风险因素的影响。将健康的社会决定因素纳入预测模型可能有助于识别这些患者,并减少与脆弱社会状况相关的健康差异。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death.评估健康的社会决定因素对可避免的 30 天再入院或死亡预测模型的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235064. eCollection 2020.
2
Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: derivation and validation of a prediction model.医疗患者中潜在可避免的 30 天内再次住院:预测模型的推导和验证。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):632-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3023.
3
An automated model to identify heart failure patients at risk for 30-day readmission or death using electronic medical record data.利用电子病历数据建立自动模型识别 30 天内再入院或死亡风险的心力衰竭患者。
Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):981-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ef60d9.
4
Identifying Potentially Avoidable Readmissions: A Medication-Based 15-Day Readmission Risk Stratification Algorithm.识别潜在可避免的再入院:一种基于药物治疗的15天再入院风险分层算法。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Mar;37(3):268-277. doi: 10.1002/phar.1896. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
Avoidable readmission in Hong Kong--system, clinician, patient or social factor?香港可避免的再入院——制度、临床医生、患者还是社会因素?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Nov 17;10:311. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-311.
6
Development and validation of a transitions-of-care pharmacist tool to predict potentially avoidable 30-day readmissions.一种用于预测潜在可避免的30天再入院情况的照护过渡药剂师工具的开发与验证
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 1;75(3):111-119. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170184.
7
Adding Social Determinant Data Changes Children's Hospitals' Readmissions Performance.添加社会决定因素数据可改变儿童医院的再入院绩效。
J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;186:150-157.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.056. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
International Validity of the HOSPITAL Score to Predict 30-Day Potentially Avoidable Hospital Readmissions.用于预测30天潜在可避免医院再入院的HOSPITAL评分的国际有效性
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):496-502. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8462.
9
Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a routine indicator of the quality of hospital care.验证潜在可避免的医院再入院率作为医院护理质量的常规指标。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):972-81. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228002.43688.c2.
10
Prospective validation and adaptation of the HOSPITAL score to predict high risk of unplanned readmission of medical patients.前瞻性验证和调整医院评分以预测内科患者计划外再入院的高风险。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Aug 6;146:w14335. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14335. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Z-codes related to social determinants of health among adult inpatients in France: a nationwide study from 2014 to 2022.法国成年住院患者中与健康社会决定因素相关的Z编码的使用:一项2014年至2022年的全国性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2225. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23442-4.
2
Understanding Population Health Management Practices Among Family Medicine Residency Programs.了解家庭医学住院医师培训项目中的人群健康管理实践。
Fam Med. 2025 Jun;57(6):417-423. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2025.484181. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Comparing the influence of social risk factors on machine learning model performance across racial and ethnic groups in home healthcare.比较家庭医疗保健中社会风险因素对不同种族和族裔群体机器学习模型性能的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 May-Jun;73(3):102431. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102431. Epub 2025 May 7.
4
Social Determinants of Health and 30-Day Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the REGARDS Study.REGARDS研究中急性心肌梗死后的健康社会决定因素与30天再入院情况
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101584. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101584. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
5
Augmenting the Hospital Score with social risk factors to improve prediction for 30-day readmission following acute myocardial infarction.用社会风险因素增强医院评分以改善急性心肌梗死后30天再入院的预测。
Med Res Arch. 2024 Nov;12(11). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i11.6089.
6
Rehabilitation and Social Determinants of Health in Critical Illness Recovery Literature: A Systematic Review.危重症康复文献中的健康康复与社会决定因素:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Dec 12;6(12):e1184. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001184. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
7
Realizing the potential of social determinants data in EHR systems: A scoping review of approaches for screening, linkage, extraction, analysis, and interventions.认识电子健康记录系统中社会决定因素数据的潜力:对筛查、关联、提取、分析和干预方法的范围审查
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 10;8(1):e147. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.571. eCollection 2024.
8
Incidence and predictors of unplanned 30-day hospital readmissions among heart failure patients in Ethiopia: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.在埃塞俄比亚,心力衰竭患者 30 天内非计划性再入院的发生率和预测因素:一项为期 5 年的回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71257-x.
9
Paramedic-Assisted Community Evaluation After Discharge: The PACED Intervention.急救员辅助社区出院评估:PACED 干预。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Oct;25(10):105165. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105165. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
10
Is it legitimate to use unplanned hospitalizations as a quality indicator for cancer patients? A retrospective French cohort study with special attention to the influence of social deprivation.将未计划住院用作癌症患者质量指标是否合理?一项关注社会剥夺影响的法国回顾性队列研究
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 14;32(7):433. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08644-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Underserved populations with missing race ethnicity data differ significantly from those with structured race/ethnicity documentation.服务不足的人群中缺失种族民族数据与那些有结构化种族/民族文档记录的人群有显著差异。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):722-729. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz040.
2
Safety-Net Hospitals, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Readmissions Under Maryland's All-Payer Program: An Observational Study.马里兰州全民医保计划下的安全网医院、社区劣势与再入院:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 16;171(2):91-98. doi: 10.7326/M16-2671. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
Social Vulnerability in Patients with Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.多病症患者的社会脆弱性:一项横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 8;16(7):1244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071244.
4
Adjusting for social risk factors impacts performance and penalties in the hospital readmissions reduction program.调整社会风险因素会影响医院再入院率降低计划的绩效和处罚。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):327-336. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13133.
5
Value of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Predicting Risk of Outcomes in Studies That Use Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据的研究中,邻里社会经济地位对预测结局风险的价值。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2716.
6
Assessment of the Effect of Adjustment for Patient Characteristics on Hospital Readmission Rates: Implications for Pay for Performance.评估调整患者特征对医院再入院率的影响:对按绩效付费的启示。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1498-1507. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4481.
7
Value-Based Payments and Inaccurate Risk Adjustment-Who Is Harmed?基于价值的支付与风险调整不准确——谁受到了伤害?
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1507-1508. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4142.
8
Secondary Use of Patients' Electronic Records (SUPER): An Approach for Meeting Specific Data Needs of Clinical and Translational Researchers.患者电子记录的二次利用(SUPER):一种满足临床和转化研究人员特定数据需求的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1581-1588. eCollection 2017.
9
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Readmissions in US Hospitals: The Role of Insurance Coverage.美国医院再入院情况中的种族/族裔差异:保险覆盖范围的作用。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018774180. doi: 10.1177/0046958018774180.
10
Addressing Social Determinants to Improve Patient Care and Promote Health Equity: An American College of Physicians Position Paper.解决社会决定因素问题以改善患者护理和促进健康公平:美国医师学会立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):577-578. doi: 10.7326/M17-2441.