Hyun Christopher, Burt Zachary, Crider Yoshika, Nelson Kara L, Sharada Prasad C S, Rayasam Swati D G, Tarpeh William, Ray Isha
Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2019 Oct;44(1):287-318. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033327. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Sanitation research focuses primarily on containing human waste and preventing disease; thus, it has traditionally been dominated by the fields of environmental engineering and public health. Over the past 20 years, however, the field has grown broader in scope and deeper in complexity, spanning diverse disciplinary perspectives. In this article, we review the current literature in the range of disciplines engaged with sanitation research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We find that perspectives on what sanitation is, and what sanitation policy should prioritize, vary widely. We show how these diverse perspectives augment the conventional sanitation service chain, a framework describing the flow of waste from capture to disposal. We review how these perspectives can inform progress toward equitable sanitation for all [i.e., Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6]. Our key message is that both material and nonmaterial flows-and both technological and social functions-make up a sanitation "system." The components of the sanitation service chain are embedded within the flows of finance, decision making, and labor that make material flows of waste possible. The functions of capture, storage, transport, treatment, reuse, and disposal are interlinked with those of ensuring equity and affordability. We find that a multilayered understanding of sanitation, with contributions from multiple disciplines, is necessary to facilitate inclusive and robust research toward the goal of sanitation for all.
环境卫生研究主要聚焦于控制人类排泄物和预防疾病;因此,传统上它一直由环境工程和公共卫生领域主导。然而,在过去20年里,该领域的范围变得更广,复杂性也更深,涵盖了不同的学科视角。在本文中,我们回顾了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)环境卫生研究相关一系列学科的当前文献。我们发现,对于什么是环境卫生以及环境卫生政策应优先考虑什么,观点差异很大。我们展示了这些不同观点如何扩展了传统的环境卫生服务链,这是一个描述废物从收集到处理流程的框架。我们回顾了这些观点如何为实现全民公平环境卫生(即可持续发展目标(SDG)6)的进展提供信息。我们的关键信息是,物质流和非物质流以及技术和社会功能共同构成了一个环境卫生“系统”。环境卫生服务链的组成部分嵌入在金融、决策和劳动力流动之中,正是这些流动使得废物的物质流成为可能。收集、储存、运输、处理、再利用和处置等功能与确保公平性和可承受性的功能相互关联。我们发现,对环境卫生有一个多层次的理解,并有多个学科的贡献,对于推动实现全民环境卫生目标的包容性和稳健研究是必要的。