• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黄蜂利用社会偷听来了解个体对手。

Wasps Use Social Eavesdropping to Learn about Individual Rivals.

机构信息

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2020 Aug 3;30(15):3007-3010.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.053. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.053
PMID:32589910
Abstract

Many animals minimize the costs of conflict by using social eavesdropping to learn about the fighting ability of potential rivals before they interact. Learning about individual conspecifics via social eavesdropping allows individuals to assess potential opponents without personal risk. However, keeping track of a network of individually differentiated social relationships is thought to be cognitively challenging. Here, we test how Polistes fuscatus nest-founding queens use social eavesdropping to assess individual rivals. Bystanders watched conspecifics fight through a clear partition. Then, bystanders were allowed to interact with fighters. Bystander behavior toward fighters was strongly influenced by the observed fight; bystanders were less aggressive toward fighters that were seen to initiate more and receive less aggression. Control trials allow us to reject alternative explanations for the link between observed aggression and bystander behavior, including priming or winner/loser effects. Therefore, P. fuscatus wasps observe and remember a complex network of social interactions between individual conspecifics rather than only paying attention to individuals they interact with directly. Wasps have an impressive capacity to learn, remember, and make social deductions about individuals. These results indicate that insects can have surprisingly complex social lives involving a network of individually differentiated social relationships.

摘要

许多动物通过社交偷听来最小化冲突的成本,即在与潜在对手互动之前,了解其战斗能力。通过社交偷听了解同种个体可以让个体在不承担个人风险的情况下评估潜在对手。然而,跟踪一个个体分化的社交关系网络被认为是具有认知挑战性的。在这里,我们测试了 Polistes fuscatus 筑巢蜂王如何通过社交偷听来评估个体对手。旁观者通过透明隔板观看同种个体的战斗。然后,旁观者被允许与战斗者互动。旁观者对战斗者的行为受到观察到的战斗的强烈影响;旁观者对被观察到发起更多攻击和收到更少攻击的战斗者的攻击性较弱。对照试验允许我们拒绝观察到的攻击与旁观者行为之间的联系的替代解释,包括启动或胜负效应。因此,P. fuscatus 黄蜂观察和记住了一个复杂的个体间社交互动网络,而不仅仅是关注它们直接与之互动的个体。黄蜂具有令人印象深刻的学习、记忆和对个体进行社交推断的能力。这些结果表明,昆虫的社交生活可能非常复杂,涉及到一个个体分化的社交关系网络。

相似文献

1
Wasps Use Social Eavesdropping to Learn about Individual Rivals.黄蜂利用社会偷听来了解个体对手。
Curr Biol. 2020 Aug 3;30(15):3007-3010.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.053. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Intraspecific Variation in Learning: Worker Wasps Are Less Able to Learn and Remember Individual Conspecific Faces than Queen Wasps.学习中的种内变异:工蜂比蜂王更难学习和记住同种个体的面孔。
Am Nat. 2018 May;191(5):595-603. doi: 10.1086/696848. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
3
Candidate genes for individual recognition in Polistes fuscatus paper wasps.用于褐胡蜂个体识别的候选基因
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016 Feb;202(2):115-29. doi: 10.1007/s00359-015-1057-9. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
4
Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking.窃听绿剑尾鱼(Xiphophorus helleri)争斗中的视觉线索:一个关于信息交流的案例
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):943-52. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1973.
5
Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus.黄蜂褐足黄蜂个体身份的视觉信号。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1423-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2031.
6
Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps.通过 Polistes dominulus 黄蜂的视觉状态信号进行相互评估。
Biol Lett. 2010 Feb 23;6(1):10-3. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0420. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
7
Novel insights into the ontogeny of nestmate recognition in Polistes social wasps.对胡蜂科社会性黄蜂中巢伴识别个体发生的新见解。
PLoS One. 2014 May 7;9(5):e97024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097024. eCollection 2014.
8
Social eavesdropping: a game-theoretic analysis.社会窃听:一种博弈论分析。
Bull Math Biol. 2007 May;69(4):1255-76. doi: 10.1007/s11538-006-9151-3. Epub 2007 Mar 20.
9
Social punishment of dishonest signalers caused by mismatch between signal and behavior.由于信号与行为不匹配,不诚实的信号发送者受到社会惩罚。
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):1637-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.042. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
10
Docile sitters and active fighters in paper wasps: a tale of two queens.胡蜂中的温顺守卫者与活跃战斗者:两位蜂后的故事
Naturwissenschaften. 2002 Apr;89(4):176-9. doi: 10.1007/s00114-002-0306-2.

引用本文的文献

1
No sensitive period for the development of individual face learning in wasps.黄蜂个体面部学习的发展不存在敏感期。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2024 Nov;78(11). doi: 10.1007/s00265-024-03527-7. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Geographic differences in individual recognition linked with social but not nonsocial cognition.个体识别中的地理差异与社会认知而非非社会认知相关联。
Behav Ecol. 2025 May 3;36(4):araf042. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araf042. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
3
Paper wasps: A model clade for social cognition.纸蜂:一个用于社会认知的模式进化枝。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2024 Dec;89:102928. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2024.102928. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
Diversity of visual inputs to Kenyon cells of the Drosophila mushroom body.果蝇蘑菇体中 Kenyon 细胞的视觉输入多样性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 7;15(1):5698. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49616-z.
5
Do They Know What They Are Doing? Cognitive Aspects of Rescue Behaviour Directed by Workers of the Red Wood Ant to Nestmate Victims Entrapped in Artificial Snares.它们知道自己在做什么吗?红木蚁工蚁对被困在人工陷阱中的巢伴受害者实施救援行为的认知方面。
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;14(4):515. doi: 10.3390/life14040515.
6
Evidence for a selective link between cooperation and individual recognition.合作与个体识别之间存在选择性联系的证据。
Curr Biol. 2023 Dec 18;33(24):5478-5487.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.11.032. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Diversity of visual inputs to Kenyon cells of the mushroom body.蕈形体肯扬细胞视觉输入的多样性。
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 14:2023.10.12.561793. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.12.561793.
8
Third-party intervention and post-conflict behaviour in agonistic encounters of pigs (Sus scrofa).猪(野猪)争斗性遭遇中的第三方干预与冲突后行为
Front Zool. 2023 Aug 17;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12983-023-00508-w.
9
Mechanisms of collective learning: how can animal groups improve collective performance when repeating a task?集体学习的机制:当动物群体重复一项任务时,它们如何提高集体表现?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220060. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0060. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Dynamics of cooperative networks associated with gender among South Indian Tamils.与南印度泰米尔人性别相关的合作网络动态。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210437. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0437. Epub 2022 Nov 28.