• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲虎蚊(Aedes albopictus)进入澳大利亚的入侵途径与黄热病蚊(Aedes aegypti)的入侵途径形成鲜明对比。

Incursion pathways of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) into Australia contrast sharply with those of the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti).

机构信息

School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Melbourne Bioinformatics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Dec;76(12):4202-4209. doi: 10.1002/ps.5977. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1002/ps.5977
PMID:32592440
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding pest incursion pathways is critical for preventing new invasions and for stopping the transfer of alleles that reduce the efficacy of local control methods. The mosquitoes Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Ae. aegypti (Linnaeus) are both highly invasive disease vectors, and through a series of ongoing international incursions are continuing to colonize new regions and spread insecticide resistance alleles among established populations. This study uses high-resolution molecular markers and a set of 241 reference genotypes to trace incursion pathways of Ae. albopictus into mainland Australia, where no successful invasions have yet been observed. We contrast these results with incursion pathways of Ae. aegypti, investigated previously.

RESULTS

Assignments successfully identified China, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan as source locations. Incursion pathways of Ae. albopictus were entirely different to those of Ae. aegypti, despite broad sympatry of these species throughout the Indo-Pacific region. Incursions of Ae. albopictus appeared to have come predominantly along marine routes from key trading locations, while Ae. aegypti was mostly linked to aerial routes from tourism hotspots.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate how genomics can help decipher otherwise cryptic incursion pathways. The inclusion of reference genotypes from the Americas may help resolve some unsuccessful assignments. While many congeneric taxa will share common incursion pathways, this study highlights that this is not always the case, and incursion pathways of important taxa should be specifically investigated. Species differences in aerial and marine incursion rates may reflect the efficacy of ongoing control programmes such as aircraft disinsection. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

了解虫害入侵途径对于防止新的入侵和阻止降低当地控制方法效果的等位基因转移至关重要。白纹伊蚊(Skuse)和埃及伊蚊(Linnaeus)都是高度入侵的疾病传播媒介,通过一系列正在进行的国际入侵事件,它们不断在新的地区建立种群,并在已建立的种群中传播抗杀虫剂的等位基因。本研究使用高分辨率分子标记和一组 241 个参考基因型来追踪白纹伊蚊进入澳大利亚大陆的入侵途径,目前在澳大利亚尚未观察到成功的入侵。我们将这些结果与之前调查的埃及伊蚊的入侵途径进行了对比。

结果

分配成功地确定了中国、日本、新加坡和中国台湾是来源地。尽管这些物种在整个印度-太平洋地区广泛共存,但白纹伊蚊的入侵途径与埃及伊蚊的入侵途径完全不同。白纹伊蚊的入侵似乎主要是沿着海洋路线从主要贸易地点而来,而埃及伊蚊则主要是通过旅游热点的空中路线而来。

结论

这些结果表明基因组学如何帮助破译否则难以理解的入侵途径。包含来自美洲的参考基因型可能有助于解决一些不成功的分配。虽然许多同属类群将有共同的入侵途径,但本研究强调并非总是如此,应该具体调查重要类群的入侵途径。空中和海洋入侵率的物种差异可能反映了正在进行的控制计划(如飞机消毒)的效果。© 2020 化学工业学会。

相似文献

1
Incursion pathways of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) into Australia contrast sharply with those of the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti).亚洲虎蚊(Aedes albopictus)进入澳大利亚的入侵途径与黄热病蚊(Aedes aegypti)的入侵途径形成鲜明对比。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Dec;76(12):4202-4209. doi: 10.1002/ps.5977. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
2
Population genomics of two invasive mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus) from the Indo-Pacific.泛太平洋地区两种入侵蚊虫(埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊)的种群基因组学
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 17;14(7):e0008463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008463. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Tracking genetic invasions: Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms reveal the source of pyrethroid-resistant (yellow fever mosquito) incursions at international ports.追踪基因入侵:全基因组单核苷酸多态性揭示国际港口拟除虫菊酯抗性(埃及伊蚊)入侵的源头。
Evol Appl. 2019 Mar 18;12(6):1136-1146. doi: 10.1111/eva.12787. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Role of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in local dengue epidemics in Taiwan.埃及伊蚊(林奈)和白纹伊蚊(斯库斯)在台湾当地登革热流行中的作用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2002-4.
5
Genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from cohabiting fields in Hainan Island and the Leizhou Peninsula, China.中国海南岛和雷州半岛同居地区埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊的遗传多样性。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Sep 8;16(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05936-5.
6
Current and future distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.世界卫生组织东地中海区域埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的当前和未来分布。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Feb 14;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0125-0.
7
Chikungunya virus transmission potential by local Aedes mosquitoes in the Americas and Europe.美洲和欧洲当地伊蚊传播基孔肯雅病毒的可能性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 May 20;9(5):e0003780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003780. eCollection 2015 May.
8
Florida Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus Vector Competency for Zika Virus.佛罗里达州埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)和白纹伊蚊对寨卡病毒的媒介效能。
J Med Entomol. 2019 Feb 25;56(2):341-346. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy231.
9
Population genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in its native range in Lao People's Democratic Republic.白纹伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)在其原生范围内的种群遗传学。老挝人民民主共和国。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Oct 14;12(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3740-0.
10
Holding back the tiger: Successful control program protects Australia from Aedes albopictus expansion.遏制“虎蚊”:成功的防控计划保护澳大利亚免受白纹伊蚊扩散的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 13;11(2):e0005286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005286. eCollection 2017 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Sugar feeding by Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia.澳大利亚托雷斯海峡白纹伊蚊的糖分摄取情况。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Feb 7;19(2):e0012856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012856. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
A genotyping array for the globally invasive vector mosquito, Aedes albopictus.一种用于全球入侵性蚊子白纹伊蚊的基因分型阵列。
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Mar 4;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06158-z.
3
Diversity and distribution of sodium channel mutations in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).白纹伊蚊钠离子通道基因突变的多样性和分布。
J Med Entomol. 2024 May 13;61(3):630-643. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae005.
4
Genome-wide SNPs reveal novel patterns of spatial genetic structure in (Diptera Culicidae) population in China.全基因组 SNPs 揭示中国(双翅目蚊科)种群的空间遗传结构的新特征。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:1028026. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1028026. eCollection 2022.
5
A literature review of dispersal pathways of Aedes albopictus across different spatial scales: implications for vector surveillance.白纹伊蚊在不同空间尺度上的扩散途径的文献综述:对病媒监测的影响。
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Aug 27;15(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05413-5.
6
Past, present and future distribution of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti: The European paradox.黄热病蚊埃及伊蚊的过去、现在和未来分布:欧洲悖论。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 15;847:157566. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157566. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
Multiple introductions and overwintering shape the progressive invasion of beyond the Alps.多次引种和越冬促成了[物种名称]越过阿尔卑斯山的渐进式入侵。 (你原文中“beyond the Alps”前缺少具体物种信息,我先按此翻译,你可根据实际情况补充完整)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e9138. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9138. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Sex-specific distribution and classification of Wolbachia infections and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups in Aedes albopictus from the Indo-Pacific.按性别分类的伊蚊属沃尔巴克氏体感染和线粒体 DNA 单倍型在泛太平洋地区的分布
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Apr 13;16(4):e0010139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010139. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Sugar prevalence in Aedes albopictus differs by habitat, sex and time of day on Masig Island, Torres Strait, Australia.在澳大利亚托雷斯海峡的马西格岛,按栖息地、性别和一天中的时间划分,白纹伊蚊的糖摄取率存在差异。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Oct 9;14(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05020-w.
10
Impact of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures on Mosquito-Borne Diseases in 2020 in Queensland, Australia.2020 年澳大利亚昆士兰州 COVID-19 缓解措施对蚊媒疾病的影响。
Viruses. 2021 Jun 16;13(6):1150. doi: 10.3390/v13061150.