• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并非总是以自我为中心:先前信念和刺激出现频率对自我与他人优先排序的影响。

It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1466-1480. doi: 10.1177/1747021820913016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/1747021820913016
PMID:32292104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7604934/
Abstract

Although self-relevance is widely acknowledged to enhance stimulus processing, the exclusivity of this effect remains open to question. In particular, in commonly adopted experimental paradigms, the prioritisation of self-relevant (vs. other-relevant) material may reflect the operation of a task-specific strategy rather than an obligatory facet of social-cognitive functioning. By changing basic aspects of the decisional context, it may therefore be possible to generate stimulus-prioritisation effects for targets other than the self. Based on the demonstration that ownership facilitates object categorisation (i.e., self-ownership effect), here we showed that stimulus prioritisation is sensitive to prior expectations about the prevalence of forthcoming objects (owned-by-self vs. owned-by-friend) and whether these beliefs are supported during the task. Under conditions of stimulus uncertainty (i.e., no prior beliefs), replicating previous research, objects were classified more rapidly when owned-by-self compared with owned-by-friend (Experiment 1). When, however, the frequency of stimulus presentation either confirmed (Experiment 2) or disconfirmed (Experiment 3) prior expectations, stimulus prioritisation was observed for the most prevalent objects regardless of their owner. A hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis further revealed that decisional bias was underpinned by differences in the evidential requirements of response generation. These findings underscore the flexibility of ownership effects (i.e., stimulus prioritisation) during object processing.

摘要

虽然自我相关性被广泛认为可以增强刺激处理,但这种效应的独特性仍存在争议。特别是在通常采用的实验范式中,自我相关(与他人相关)材料的优先级可能反映了特定任务的策略的运作,而不是社会认知功能的强制性方面。通过改变决策背景的基本方面,因此可能会为自我以外的目标产生刺激优先化效应。基于所有权促进物体分类的证明(即自我所有权效应),我们在这里表明,刺激优先化对即将到来的物体(自我拥有与朋友拥有)的出现的预期以及这些信念在任务期间是否得到支持敏感。在刺激不确定的情况下(即没有先验信念),复制了先前的研究,与朋友拥有相比,自我拥有的物体的分类速度更快(实验 1)。然而,当刺激呈现的频率要么确认(实验 2)要么否定(实验 3)了先验的期望时,无论其所有者如何,最常见的物体都会受到刺激优先化的影响。分层漂移扩散模型(HDDM)分析进一步表明,决策偏差是由响应生成的证据要求的差异所支撑的。这些发现强调了物体处理过程中所有权效应(即刺激优先化)的灵活性。

相似文献

1
It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.并非总是以自我为中心:先前信念和刺激出现频率对自我与他人优先排序的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1466-1480. doi: 10.1177/1747021820913016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Valence and ownership: object desirability influences self-prioritization.价态和所有权:客体吸引力影响自我优先化。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01235-w. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.探索自我所有权效应:区分刺激偏差和反应偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):295-306. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000455. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making.自我相关性增强决策过程中的证据收集。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Stimulus valence moderates self-learning.刺激效价调节自我学习。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Sep;38(6):884-897. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2331817. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
I before U: Temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects.I在U之前:时间顺序判断揭示了对自有物品的偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):589-598. doi: 10.1177/1747021818762010. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
The ownership memory self-reference effect shifts recognition criterion but not recognition sensitivity.所有权记忆自我参照效应改变了识别标准,但没有改变识别敏感性。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):1952-1968. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01994-1. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
8
Mine and me: exploring the neural basis of object ownership.我和我的:探索物体所有权的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3657-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00042. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
Knock yourself out: Brief mindfulness-based meditation eliminates self-prioritization.尽情尝试吧:基于正念的简短冥想能消除自我优先化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):341-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02111-2. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
On stopping yourself: Self-relevance facilitates response inhibition.停止自我:自我相关性促进反应抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1416-1423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02248-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive and neural underpinnings of friend-prioritization in a perceptual matching task.知觉匹配任务中朋友优先级的认知与神经基础
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Feb 3;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf009.
2
Mine for life: Charting ownership effects in memory from adolescence to old age.生命挖掘:绘制从青春期到老年记忆中的所有权效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Apr;78(4):766-780. doi: 10.1177/17470218241254119. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Temporal Properties of Self-Prioritization.自我优先级排序的时间特性。

本文引用的文献

1
Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory.在刺激处理过程中进行自我优先级排序并非是必须的。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):503-508. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
2
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization.自我的一部分:身份相关性调节自我优先化。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
Valence and ownership: object desirability influences self-prioritization.价态和所有权:客体吸引力影响自我优先化。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Mar 9;26(3):242. doi: 10.3390/e26030242.
4
The role of identity priming on the (unconscious) bodily self-attribution.身份启动对(无意识)身体自我归因的作用。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1331-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01944-x. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
The Functional Self.功能自我。
Exp Psychol. 2023 Mar;70(2):81-95. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000582.
6
Structured reflection increases intentions to reduce other people's health risks during COVID-19.结构化反思增强了在新冠疫情期间降低他人健康风险的意愿。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Oct 3;1(5):pgac218. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac218. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims.自我优先性再思考:审视三个主张
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jul;18(4):876-886. doi: 10.1177/17456916221131273. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.或多或少的我和你:自我相关性增强了项目概率对刺激优先化的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1145-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01235-w. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Self-prioritization and the attentional systems.自我优先化与注意系统。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:148-152. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli.完全陌生刺激的自我优先排序。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):2110-2120. doi: 10.1177/1747021819832981. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
6
Neural mechanisms for learning self and other ownership.学习自我和他人所有权的神经机制。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 12;9(1):4747. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07231-9.
7
Searching for the inner self: evidence against a direct dependence of the self-prioritization effect on the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex.探寻内在自我:反对自我优先效应直接依赖腹内侧前额叶皮层的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jan;237(1):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5413-1. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
The central locus of self-prioritisation.自我优先化的核心位点。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1068-1083. doi: 10.1177/1747021818778970. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
I before U: Temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects.I在U之前:时间顺序判断揭示了对自有物品的偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):589-598. doi: 10.1177/1747021818762010. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Self as Object: Emerging Trends in Self Research.自我客体化:自我研究的新兴趋势。
Trends Neurosci. 2017 Nov;40(11):643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.