Suppr超能文献

孤立性舒张期高血压的临床意义。

The clinical significance of isolated diastolic hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center , Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 2020 Sep;132(7):624-628. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1788294. Epub 2020 Jul 12.

Abstract

The prevalence of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) has been increased in hypertensive subjects with the new 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure treatment guidelines to 6.5% from 1.3% by the JNC-7 guidelines. However, its clinical significance as a cause of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events especially in older subjects has been debated by several investigators, who have demonstrated no adverse CV effects of untreated IDH, but not by others. It is also more common in the young subjects who are at low CV risk and quite rare in the older subjects, who are at increased CV risk. Treatment of IDH in the older subjects could increase the CV complications due to a J-curve effect and, in addition, could increase the incidence of stroke from further lowering the normal systolic blood pressure (SBP). Very low SBP and DBP cannot be sustained by the cerebral blood flow autoregulation and could lead to cerebral ischemia. In order to get a better perspective of the current status of the treatment of IDH, a review of the English language literature of the available studies was conducted and 12 papers with pertinent information were retrieved. The analysis of results from these studies suggests that IDH is associated with adverse CV events in younger persons and it should be treated. In contrast, the prevalence of IDH is low in older subjects and is not associated with adverse CV events in the majority of cases. Thus, its further lowering should be avoided to prevent further decrease in normal SBP and prevent the onset of adverse CV events. However, the decision to treat IDH in older subjects should be individualized.

摘要

孤立性舒张期高血压(IDH)的患病率在高血压患者中有所增加,根据 2017 年 ACC/AHA 血压治疗指南,其患病率从 JNC-7 指南的 1.3%上升至 6.5%。然而,其作为不良心血管(CV)事件的原因的临床意义一直受到一些研究人员的争论,他们已经证明未经治疗的 IDH 没有不良 CV 影响,但其他人则没有。它在心血管风险较低的年轻患者中更为常见,而在心血管风险增加的老年患者中则相当罕见。在老年患者中治疗 IDH 可能会因 J 型曲线效应而增加 CV 并发症,此外,进一步降低正常收缩压(SBP)可能会增加中风的发生率。大脑血流自动调节无法维持非常低的 SBP 和 DBP,可能导致脑缺血。为了更好地了解 IDH 治疗的现状,对现有的英文文献进行了综述,并检索到了 12 篇相关信息的论文。对这些研究结果的分析表明,IDH 与年轻患者的不良 CV 事件相关,应进行治疗。相比之下,IDH 在老年患者中的患病率较低,且在大多数情况下与不良 CV 事件无关。因此,应避免进一步降低 IDH,以防止正常 SBP 进一步降低,防止不良 CV 事件的发生。然而,在老年患者中治疗 IDH 的决定应个体化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验