Suppr超能文献

“涂抹大麻浓缩物的时间”:分析美国各地关于大麻浓缩物的推特数据

"Time for dabs": Analyzing Twitter data on marijuana concentrates across the U.S.

作者信息

Daniulaityte Raminta, Nahhas Ramzi W, Wijeratne Sanjaya, Carlson Robert G, Lamy Francois R, Martins Silvia S, Boyer Edward W, Smith G Alan, Sheth Amit

机构信息

Center for Interventions, Treatment, and Addictions Research (CITAR), Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 3171 Research Blvd., Suite 124, Dayton, OH 45420-4006, United States.

Lifespan Health Research Center, Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Oct 1;155:307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.1199. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

Abstract

AIMS

Media reports suggest increasing popularity of marijuana concentrates ("dabs"; "earwax"; "budder"; "shatter; "butane hash oil") that are typically vaporized and inhaled via a bong, vaporizer or electronic cigarette. However, data on the epidemiology of marijuana concentrate use remain limited. This study aims to explore Twitter data on marijuana concentrate use in the U.S. and identify differences across regions of the country with varying cannabis legalization policies.

METHODS

Tweets were collected between October 20 and December 20, 2014, using Twitter's streaming API. Twitter data filtering framework was available through the eDrugTrends platform. Raw and adjusted percentages of dabs-related tweets per state were calculated. A permutation test was used to examine differences in the adjusted percentages of dabs-related tweets among U.S. states with different cannabis legalization policies.

RESULTS

eDrugTrends collected a total of 125,255 tweets. Almost 22% (n=27,018) of these tweets contained identifiable state-level geolocation information. Dabs-related tweet volume for each state was adjusted using a general sample of tweets to account for different levels of overall tweeting activity for each state. Adjusted percentages of dabs-related tweets were highest in states that allowed recreational and/or medicinal cannabis use and lowest in states that have not passed medical cannabis use laws. The differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Twitter data suggest greater popularity of dabs in the states that legalized recreational and/or medical use of cannabis. The study provides new information on the epidemiology of marijuana concentrate use and contributes to the emerging field of social media analysis for drug abuse research.

摘要

目的

媒体报道显示,大麻浓缩物(“蜡块”“耳垢”“软糖”“碎片”“丁烷哈希油”)越来越受欢迎,这些通常通过水烟枪、蒸发器或电子烟进行汽化和吸入。然而,关于大麻浓缩物使用的流行病学数据仍然有限。本研究旨在探索美国关于大麻浓缩物使用的推特数据,并确定该国不同地区在大麻合法化政策不同的情况下的差异。

方法

使用推特的流式应用程序编程接口在2014年10月20日至12月20日期间收集推文。通过eDrugTrends平台可获得推特数据过滤框架。计算每个州与蜡块相关推文的原始百分比和调整后百分比。使用排列检验来检验不同大麻合法化政策的美国各州之间与蜡块相关推文调整后百分比的差异。

结果

eDrugTrends总共收集了125,255条推文。其中近22%(n = 27,018)的推文包含可识别的州级地理位置信息。使用推文的一般样本对每个州与蜡块相关的推文数量进行调整,以考虑每个州总体推文活动的不同水平。与蜡块相关推文的调整后百分比在允许娱乐性和/或药用大麻使用的州最高,在未通过医用大麻使用法律的州最低。差异具有统计学意义。

结论

推特数据表明,在大麻娱乐性和/或药用使用合法化的州,蜡块更受欢迎。该研究提供了关于大麻浓缩物使用流行病学的新信息,并为药物滥用研究的社交媒体分析这一新兴领域做出了贡献。

相似文献

6
A Twitter-based survey on marijuana concentrate use.基于 Twitter 的大麻浓缩物使用情况调查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 1;187:155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.033. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
7
A content analysis of tweets about high-potency marijuana.关于高效能大麻推文的内容分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Sep 1;166:100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.034. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Twitter chatter about marijuana.推特上关于大麻的热议。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Twitter chatter about marijuana.推特上关于大麻的热议。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270.
4
A new method of cannabis ingestion: the dangers of dabs?一种吸食大麻的新方法:大麻脂有哪些危害?
Addict Behav. 2014 Oct;39(10):1430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data.分析推特数据时的方法学考量
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013 Dec;2013(47):140-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt026.
7
Twitter and public health.推特与公共卫生。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):375-83. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000041.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验