Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 29;15(6):e0235293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235293. eCollection 2020.
Examining factors that may explain disparities in fitness levels among youth is a critical step in youth fitness promotion. The purpose of this study was twofold; 1) to examine the influence of school-level characteristics on fitness test performance; 2) to compare Irish adolescents' physical fitness to European norms.
Adolescents (n = 1215, girls = 609) aged 13.4 years (SD .41) from a randomised sample of 20 secondary schools, stratified for gender, location and educational (dis)advantage, completed a series of field-based tests to measure the components of health-related physical fitness. Tests included: body mass index; 20 metre shuttle run test (20 m SRT); handgrip strength; standing broad jump (SBJ); 4 x 10 metre shuttle run; and back-saver sit-and-reach (BSR).
Overall, boys outperformed girls in all tests, aside from the BSR (p < 0.005, t-test, Bonferroni correction). Participants in designated disadvantaged schools had significantly higher body mass index levels (p < 0.001), and significantly lower cardiorespiratory endurance (20 m SRT) (p < 0.001) and muscular strength (handgrip strength) (p = 0.018) levels compared to participants in non-disadvantaged schools. When compared to European norms, girls in this study scored significantly higher in the 20 m SRT, 4 x 10 metre shuttle run and SBJ tests, while boys scored significantly higher in the BSR test (Cohen's d 0.2 to 0.6, p < 0.001). However, European adolescents had significantly higher handgrip strength scores (Cohen's d 0.6 to 0.8, p < 0.001).
Irish adolescents compared favourably to European normative values across most components of HRPF, with the exception of muscular strength. School socioeconomic status was a strong determinant of performance among Irish adolescents. The contrasting findings for different fitness components reiterate the need for multi-component testing batteries for monitoring fitness in youth.
研究可能导致青少年体能差异的因素对于促进青少年健康至关重要。本研究的目的有两个:1)检验学校层面特征对体能测试表现的影响;2)比较爱尔兰青少年的体质与欧洲标准。
本研究随机选取 20 所中学,按照性别、地理位置和教育(劣势)分层,对 13.4 岁(标准差 0.41)的青少年(n=1215,女生 609 人)进行了一系列现场测试,以衡量与健康相关的体质的组成部分。测试包括:身体质量指数;20 米往返跑测试(20m SRT);握力;立定跳远(SBJ);4x10 米往返跑;背力体前屈(BSR)。
总体而言,除 BSR 外(p<0.005,t 检验,Bonferroni 校正),男生在所有测试中均优于女生。指定弱势学校的学生身体质量指数显著较高(p<0.001),心肺耐力(20m SRT)(p<0.001)和肌肉力量(握力)(p=0.018)显著较低与非弱势学校的学生相比。与欧洲标准相比,本研究中的女生在 20m SRT、4x10 米往返跑和 SBJ 测试中得分显著更高,而男生在 BSR 测试中得分显著更高(Cohen's d 0.2 至 0.6,p<0.001)。然而,欧洲青少年的握力得分显著更高(Cohen's d 0.6 至 0.8,p<0.001)。
爱尔兰青少年在与健康相关的体质的大多数组成部分上与欧洲标准值相比表现良好,除肌肉力量外。学校社会经济地位是爱尔兰青少年表现的一个重要决定因素。不同体质成分的对比发现,需要使用多成分测试组合来监测青少年的体质。