Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montreal, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Oct;237(10):3047-3056. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05591-z. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
Stress is associated with increased sensitivity to threat. Previous investigations examining how stress affects threat processing have largely focused on biomarker responses associated with either the sympathetic-nervous-system (SNS) or the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.
We pharmacologically suppressed activations of SNS, HPA, or both, prior to stress and investigated how each stress system modulates social threat assessment.
One hundred sixty-one healthy men and women were randomized in a between-subject design, to one of four pharmacological or placebo conditions: dexamethasone-placebo, placebo-propranolol, dexamethasone-propranolol, or placebo-placebo. Participants provided threat assessments for angry and neutral human faces on a baseline day, and immediately after stress induction on a testing day.
With both systems responding normally to stress (placebo-placebo), threat assessment was higher for neutral faces compared with angry. Compared with placebo, SNS suppression resulted in increased threat assessment for angry faces. HPA suppression resulted in decreased threat assessment for neutral and angry faces. When both systems were suppressed, there was an increase in threat assessment for angry faces, and no difference from placebo for neutral.
Our findings demonstrated that when intact, the biological stress systems adaptively support organisms during stress by focusing attention towards specific stimuli that are relevant to the threat. Dysregulations of the stress systems result in important system specific consequences on threat evaluation, such that suppression of either stress system alone resulted in reduced threat assessment for contextually relevant threatening stimuli, whereas when both systems were suppressed, individuals appear indiscriminately attentive to all potential threats in the environment, resulting in increased threat processing of both contextually relevant and irrelevant stimuli. Given that stress-related psychopathologies have been associated with dysregulations of the stress systems and biased responses to social threat, a systematic understanding of the mechanisms that underlie how stress systems modulate social threat assessment is needed, and can provide important insights into the cognitive processes that are involved in the development and maintenance of stress-related psychopathologies.
压力与对威胁的敏感性增加有关。以前的研究主要集中在研究压力如何影响威胁处理时,考察了与交感神经系统(SNS)或下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴相关的生物标志物反应。
我们在压力之前使用药理学方法抑制 SNS、HPA 或两者的激活,并研究每个应激系统如何调节社会威胁评估。
161 名健康男性和女性以受试者间设计随机分为四组中的一组:地塞米松-安慰剂、安慰剂-普萘洛尔、地塞米松-普萘洛尔或安慰剂-安慰剂。参与者在基线日对愤怒和中性人脸进行威胁评估,并在测试日立即在应激诱导后进行评估。
在两个系统对压力均正常反应(安慰剂-安慰剂)的情况下,中性脸的威胁评估高于愤怒脸。与安慰剂相比,SNS 抑制导致愤怒面孔的威胁评估增加。HPA 抑制导致中性和愤怒面孔的威胁评估降低。当两个系统均被抑制时,愤怒面孔的威胁评估增加,与安慰剂相比没有差异。
我们的研究结果表明,在完整的情况下,生物应激系统通过将注意力集中在与威胁相关的特定刺激上,自适应地在压力期间支持生物体。应激系统的失调导致威胁评估方面出现重要的系统特异性后果,例如,单独抑制任一应激系统都会导致对上下文相关威胁刺激的威胁评估降低,而当两个系统均被抑制时,个体似乎对环境中的所有潜在威胁不加区分地注意,导致对上下文相关和不相关刺激的威胁处理增加。鉴于与应激相关的精神病理学与应激系统的失调和对社会威胁的偏见反应有关,因此需要系统地了解应激系统调节社会威胁评估的机制,这可以为涉及应激相关精神病理学的发展和维持的认知过程提供重要的见解。