Suppr超能文献

躺在被碾压前的路上:交通杀人、自杀还是意外?两例病例报告及文献复习。

Lying on the Road Before Being Run Over: Vehicular Manslaughter, Suicide, or Accident? Two Case Reports and Literature Review.

机构信息

Legal Medicine and Toxicology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, via G. Falloppio n.50, Padova, 35121, Italy.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2020 Nov;65(6):2170-2173. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14500. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Abstract

We present two apparent hit-and-run cases where two women were run over. The vehicles involved were subsequently traced and their owners charged with manslaughter. Autopsy evidence, scientific investigation of the scene and circumstances of the deaths, technical inspection of the vehicles, and DNA analysis strongly suggested that both victims were lying on the road before the accident. Case 1 was a suicide. In Case 2, the victim had fallen to the ground following acute alcohol intoxication. Victimological analysis was pivotal in reconstructing the dynamics of the events. We suggest that a hit-and-run fatality should not be regarded as a manslaughter case until each piece of evidence has been carefully considered. We also propose an interdisciplinary method of reconstructing run over occurrences based on the following three steps: (i) identify whether there was a primary impact when the victim was in an upright position; (ii) identify victim drug/alcohol intoxication and/or presence of acute or chronic disease or injury, which may have contributed to the impact; and (iii) consider suicide intent.

摘要

我们呈现了两起明显的肇事逃逸案件,两名女性被车撞倒。随后追踪到涉案车辆,并对其车主以过失杀人罪提起诉讼。尸检证据、对事故现场和情况的科学调查、车辆技术检查以及 DNA 分析均强烈表明,两名受害者在事故发生前均躺在路上。案例 1 为自杀,案例 2 中,受害者因急性酒精中毒倒地。受害者分析在重建事件动态方面至关重要。我们建议,在仔细考虑所有证据之前,不应将肇事逃逸致人死亡视为过失杀人案。我们还提出了一种基于以下三个步骤的重建被碾压事件的跨学科方法:(i)确定受害者是否处于直立位置时发生了初步撞击;(ii)确定受害者是否存在药物/酒精中毒以及/或是否存在急性或慢性疾病或损伤,这些因素可能导致了撞击;(iii)考虑自杀意图。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验