• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动医疗与感知的医疗服务质量:概念模型与验证。

MHealth and perceived quality of care delivery: a conceptual model and validation.

机构信息

Department of Business Information Systems, University College Cork, O' Rahilly Building, Cork, Ireland.

Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1049-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-1049-8
PMID:32103746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this research is to examine, conceptualize, and empirically validate a model of mobile health (mHealth) impacts on physicians' perceived quality of care delivery (PQoC).

METHODS

Observational quasi-experimental one group posttest-only design was implemented through the empirical testing of the conceptual model with nine hypotheses related to the association of task and technology characteristics, self-efficacy, m-health utilization, task-technology fit (TTF), and their relationships with PQoC. Primary data was collected over a four-month period from acute care physicians in The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada. The self-reported data was collected by employing a survey and distributed through the internal hospital channels to physicians who adopted iPads for their daily activities.

RESULTS

Physicians' PQoC was found to be positively affected by the level of mHealth utilization and TTF, while the magnitude of the TTF direct effect was two times stronger than utilization. Additionally, self-efficacy has the highest direct and total effect on mHealth utilization; in the formation of TTF, technological characteristics dominate followed by task characteristics.

CONCLUSION

To date, the impact of utilized mHealth on PQoC has neither been richly theorized nor explored in depth. We address this gap in existing literature. Realizing how an organization can improve TTF will lead to better PQoC.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在考察、概念化和实证验证移动医疗(mHealth)对医生感知的护理提供质量(PQoC)的影响模型。

方法

通过对概念模型的实证检验,实施了观察性准实验单组后测设计,其中包含九个与任务和技术特征、自我效能、mHealth 利用、任务技术匹配(TTF)以及它们与 PQoC 的关系相关的假设。主要数据是通过在加拿大安大略省渥太华医院对急性护理医生进行为期四个月的观察收集的。通过内部医院渠道向采用 iPad 进行日常活动的医生发放调查,收集自我报告数据。

结果

研究发现,mHealth 的利用程度和 TTF 对医生的 PQoC 有积极影响,而 TTF 的直接影响程度是利用程度的两倍。此外,自我效能对 mHealth 的利用具有最高的直接和总效应;在 TTF 的形成中,技术特征占据主导地位,其次是任务特征。

结论

迄今为止,利用移动医疗对 PQoC 的影响既没有得到充分的理论化,也没有得到深入的探讨。我们填补了现有文献中的这一空白。了解组织如何提高 TTF 将有助于提高 PQoC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf4/7045642/a6dd76af714d/12911_2020_1049_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf4/7045642/077e95868c8c/12911_2020_1049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf4/7045642/a6dd76af714d/12911_2020_1049_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf4/7045642/077e95868c8c/12911_2020_1049_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf4/7045642/a6dd76af714d/12911_2020_1049_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
MHealth and perceived quality of care delivery: a conceptual model and validation.移动医疗与感知的医疗服务质量:概念模型与验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1049-8.
2
A model for predicting utilization of mHealth interventions in low-resource settings: case of maternal and newborn care in Kenya.用于预测在资源匮乏环境中使用移动医疗干预措施的模型:以肯尼亚母婴保健为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jul 17;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0649-z.
3
Determinants of readiness to adopt mHealth in a rural community of Bangladesh.孟加拉国一个农村社区采用移动健康技术的准备度决定因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):847-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model.理解影响老年人采用移动健康技术的因素:技术接受与使用统一理论模型的扩展
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Mobile Health Divide Between Clinicians and Patients in Cancer Care: Results From a Cross-Sectional International Survey.癌症护理中临床医生与患者之间的移动医疗鸿沟:一项跨国际横断面调查的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 6;7(9):e13584. doi: 10.2196/13584.
6
Investigating the Effect of Paid and Free Feedback About Physicians' Telemedicine Services on Patients' and Physicians' Behaviors: Panel Data Analysis.探究关于医生远程医疗服务的付费和免费反馈对患者及医生行为的影响:面板数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 22;21(3):e12156. doi: 10.2196/12156.
7
User acceptance of mobile health services from users' perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance.从用户角度看用户对移动健康服务的接受度:自我效能感和反应效能感在技术接受中的作用
Inform Health Soc Care. 2017 Mar;42(2):194-206. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Understanding Determinants of Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Mobile Health Continuance and Performance.了解医疗保健专业人员对移动健康持续使用和性能的看法的决定因素。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Mar 18;7(1):e12350. doi: 10.2196/12350.
9
Assessing task-technology fit in a PACS upgrade: do users' and developers' appraisals converge?评估 PACS 升级中的任务-技术匹配:用户和开发者的评估是否趋同?
J Digit Imaging. 2011 Dec;24(6):951-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9378-x.
10
Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者使用电子健康和移动健康技术。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Clinicians' Intentions and Influencing Factors for Using an Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support System in Health Care Systems: Cross-Sectional Survey.调查医疗保健系统中临床医生使用智能诊断临床决策支持系统的意图及影响因素:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 7;27:e62732. doi: 10.2196/62732.
2
Mobile Health Interventions: A Frontier for Mitigating the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.移动健康干预措施:减轻全球心血管疾病负担的前沿领域。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):e62157. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62157. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
A Data-Driven Paradigm for a Resilient and Sustainable Integrated Health Information Systems for Health Care Applications.

本文引用的文献

1
Mixed methods study of medication-related decision support alerts experienced during electronic prescribing for inpatients at an English hospital.对英国一家医院住院患者电子处方过程中经历的与药物相关的决策支持警报的混合方法研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Nov;26(6):318-322. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001483. Epub 2018 May 19.
2
Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment.电子健康记录的采用与护士对可用性和护理质量的报告:工作环境的作用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):129-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678551. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
3
Focus Section Health IT Usability: Applying a Task-Technology Fit Model to Adapt an Electronic Patient Portal for Patient Work.
一种用于医疗保健应用的具有弹性和可持续性的综合健康信息系统的数据驱动范式。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 12;16:4015-4025. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S433299. eCollection 2023.
4
Lessons from digital technology-enabled health interventions implemented during the coronavirus pandemic to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a global scoping review.数字技术赋能的卫生干预措施在冠状病毒大流行期间改善母婴和生育结局的经验教训:全球范围的系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05454-3.
5
Supporting Management of Noncommunicable Diseases With Mobile Health (mHealth) Apps: Experimental Study.利用移动健康(mHealth)应用程序支持非传染性疾病管理:实验研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 2;9(1):e28697. doi: 10.2196/28697.
6
Integration of mHealth Information and Communication Technologies Into the Clinical Settings of Hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa: Qualitative Study.将移动医疗信息和通信技术融入撒哈拉以南非洲医院的临床环境中:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 13;9(10):e26358. doi: 10.2196/26358.
7
Health Communication in COVID-19 Era: Experiences from the Italian VaccinarSì Network Websites.新冠疫情时代的健康传播:意大利 VaccinarSì 网络网站的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115642.
8
Determinants of the behavioral intention to use a mobile nursing application by nurses in China.中国护士使用移动护理应用程序的行为意愿的决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06244-3.
9
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.
10
Use of Instagram by Pre-Service Teacher Education: Smartphone Habits and Dependency Factors.职前教师教育中使用 Instagram:智能手机习惯和依赖因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114097.
焦点专题 健康信息技术的可用性:应用任务-技术匹配模型来调整电子患者门户以适应患者工作。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):174-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632396. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity.理解与衡量医疗质量:应对复杂性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 May 1;95(5):368-374. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179309. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
Why do entrepreneurial mHealth ventures in the developing world fail to scale?为什么发展中世界的移动医疗创业企业难以实现规模扩张?
J Med Eng Technol. 2016 Oct-Nov;40(7-8):444-457. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1213901. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Mobile health applications in clinical practice: pearls, pitfalls, and key considerations.临床实践中的移动健康应用:要点、陷阱及关键考量因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Aug;117(2):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.012.
7
Future of the Smartphone for Patients and Healthcare Providers.智能手机对患者和医疗服务提供者的未来。
Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Jan;22(1):1-2. doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.1.1. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
8
m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员对移动健康的采用:一项系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv052. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.探索医生专科医生对基于网络的调查的回应率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 9;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.
10
Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review.移动健康慢性病管理对治疗依从性和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3951.