• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 COVID-19 共存:一种实施基于证据的健康政策的系统和多标准方法。

Living With COVID-19: A Systemic and Multi-Criteria Approach to Enact Evidence-Based Health Policy.

机构信息

IHAP, University of Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;8:294. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00294. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00294
PMID:32612973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308759/
Abstract

The lifting of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) lockdown requires, in the short and medium terms, a holistic and evidence-based approach to population health management based on combining risk factors and bio-economic outcomes, including actors' behaviors. This dynamic and global approach to health control is necessary to deal with the new paradigm of living with an infectious disease, which disrupts our individual freedom and behaviors. The challenge for policymakers consists of defining methods of lockdown-lifting and follow-up (middle-term rules) that best meet the needs for resumption of economic activity, societal wellbeing, and containment of the outbreak. There is no simple and ready-to-use way to do this since it means considering several competing objectives at the same time and continuously adapting the strategy and rules, ideally at local scale. We propose a framework for creating a precision evidence-based health policy that simultaneously considers public health, economic, and societal dimensions while accounting for constraints and uncertainty. It is based on the four following principles: integrating multiple and heterogeneous information, accepting navigation with uncertainty, adjusting the strategy dynamically with feedback mechanisms, and managing clusters through a multi-scalar conception. The evidence-based policy intervention for COVID-19 obtained includes scientific background via epidemiological modeling and bio-economic modeling. A set of quantitative and qualitative indicators are used as feedback to precisely monitor the societal-economic-epidemiological dynamics, allowing tightening or loosening of measures before epidemic damage (re-)occurs. Altogether, this allows an evidence-based policy that steers the strategy with precision and avoids any political shock.

摘要

解除 COVID-19(2019 年冠状病毒病)封锁需要在短期和中期内采取一种整体的、基于证据的人口健康管理方法,该方法基于结合风险因素和生物经济结果,包括行为者的行为。这种动态的、全球性的健康控制方法是必要的,以应对与传染病共存的新范式,这种范式扰乱了我们的个人自由和行为。政策制定者面临的挑战在于定义解除封锁和后续措施(中期规则)的方法,这些方法最好满足恢复经济活动、社会福利和控制疫情爆发的需求。没有简单的、现成的方法可以做到这一点,因为这意味着同时考虑几个相互竞争的目标,并不断调整策略和规则,理想情况下是在地方层面进行调整。我们提出了一个创建基于精准证据的卫生政策的框架,该框架同时考虑公共卫生、经济和社会维度,同时考虑到约束和不确定性。它基于以下四个原则:整合多种异质信息,接受不确定性下的导航,利用反馈机制动态调整策略,以及通过多尺度概念管理集群。所获得的 COVID-19 基于证据的政策干预措施包括通过流行病学建模和生物经济建模获得的科学背景。一组定量和定性指标被用作反馈,以精确监测社会经济流行病学动态,在疫情损害(重新)发生之前收紧或放宽措施。总之,这使得基于证据的政策能够精确地引导策略,避免任何政治冲击。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c6a/7308759/5e597ba3532e/fpubh-08-00294-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c6a/7308759/5e597ba3532e/fpubh-08-00294-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c6a/7308759/5e597ba3532e/fpubh-08-00294-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Living With COVID-19: A Systemic and Multi-Criteria Approach to Enact Evidence-Based Health Policy.与 COVID-19 共存:一种实施基于证据的健康政策的系统和多标准方法。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;8:294. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00294. eCollection 2020.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Individual Behaviors and COVID-19 Lockdown Exit Strategy: A Mid-Term Multidimensional Bio-economic Modeling Approach.个体行为与 COVID-19 封锁退出策略:中期多维生物经济建模方法。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;8:606371. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.606371. eCollection 2020.
4
Searching for Digital Technologies in Containment and Mitigation Strategies: Experience from South Korea COVID-19.搜索遏制和缓解策略中的数字技术:来自韩国 COVID-19 的经验。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Aug 31;86(1):109. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2993.
5
Assessment of Quarantine Understanding and Adherence to Lockdown Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Palestine: Community Experience and Evidence for Action.评估巴勒斯坦在 COVID-19 大流行期间的隔离理解和对封锁措施的遵守情况:社区经验和行动证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;9:570242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.570242. eCollection 2021.
6
The 5% of the Population at High Risk for Severe COVID-19 Infection Is Identifiable and Needs to Be Taken Into Account When Reopening the Economy.新冠病毒严重感染高风险的5%人群是可识别的,在经济重启时需要予以考虑。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 May;26(3):219-227. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000475.
7
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
8
COVID-19 health policy evaluation: integrating health and economic perspectives with a data envelopment analysis approach.COVID-19 卫生政策评估:运用数据包络分析方法综合健康和经济视角。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1263-1285. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01425-7. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
COVID-19 in South Africa: outbreak despite interventions.南非的 COVID-19 疫情:尽管采取了干预措施,但仍有疫情爆发。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 2;11(1):4956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84487-0.
10
The micro-economic effects of COVID-19 containment measures: A simple model and evidence from China.**新冠病毒(COVID-19)防控措施的微观经济效应:一个简单模型及来自中国的证据。**
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0288632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288632. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of economic evaluation in modelling public health and social measures for pandemic policy: a systematic review.经济评估在为大流行政策制定公共卫生和社会措施模型中的作用:一项系统综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Nov 1;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00585-6.
2
COVID-19 compliance among urban trail users: Behavioral insights and environmental implications.城市步道使用者对新冠疫情防控措施的遵守情况:行为洞察与环境影响
J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2023 Mar;41:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2021.100396. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
3
Knowledge and experience of physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A global cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of lockdown on COVID-19 epidemic in Île-de-France and possible exit strategies.封锁对法兰西岛 COVID-19 疫情的影响及可能的退出策略。
BMC Med. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01698-4.
2
Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.预测 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动力学,直至大流行后期。
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
Disease Control, Civil Liberties, and Mass Testing - Calibrating Restrictions during the Covid-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情期间医生的知识与经验:一项全球横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;2(7):e0000639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000639. eCollection 2022.
4
Time to Lift up COVID-19 Restrictions? Public Support towards Living with the Virus Policy and Associated Factors among Hong Kong General Public.是否到了放宽 COVID-19 限制的时候了?香港公众对与病毒共存政策的支持及相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2989. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042989.
5
The collaborative outcomes study on health and functioning during infection times in adults (COH-FIT-Adults): Design and methods of an international online survey targeting physical and mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.成人感染期健康与功能合作研究(COH-FIT-Adults):针对 COVID-19 大流行对身心健康影响的国际在线调查的设计和方法。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 15;299:393-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.048. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Revealing spatiotemporal transmission patterns and stages of COVID-19 in China using individual patients' trajectory data.利用个体患者轨迹数据揭示中国新冠肺炎的时空传播模式和阶段。
Comput Urban Sci. 2021;1(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s43762-021-00009-8. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic.遵循科学?论社会科学在新冠疫情中的边缘作用。
Eur J Philos Sci. 2021;11(4):99. doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00416-y. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Simulation-based multi-criteria decision making: an interactive method with a case study on infectious disease epidemics.基于模拟的多标准决策:一种交互式方法及传染病流行案例研究
Ann Oper Res. 2021 Oct 12:1-30. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04321-8.
9
Pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2, options for efficiency at scale.SARS-CoV-2 混合检测,提高效率的选择。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Oct 1;99(10):708-714. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.283093. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
10
Superiority of Mild Interventions against COVID-19 on Public Health and Economic Measures.针对COVID-19的温和干预措施在公共卫生和经济措施方面的优越性。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 26;11(8):719. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080719.
疾病控制、公民自由与大规模检测——新冠疫情期间的限制措施校准
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):102-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2007637. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
Comparing regression, naive Bayes, and random forest methods in the prediction of individual survival to second lactation in Holstein cattle.比较回归、朴素贝叶斯和随机森林方法在荷斯坦奶牛个体预测第二次泌乳存活中的应用。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):9409-9421. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16295. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Systems healthcare: a holistic paradigm for tomorrow.系统医疗:明日的整体范式。
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Dec 19;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12918-017-0521-2.
7
Rethinking health systems strengthening: key systems thinking tools and strategies for transformational change.重新思考卫生系统强化:实现变革的关键系统思维工具和策略。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv54-61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs090.
8
Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions.社会生态学方法及其对个体和环境的影响:健康教育和行为健康促进干预的二十年。
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Jun;39(3):364-72. doi: 10.1177/1090198111418634. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.超越万灵药的诊断方法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15181-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
10
Multiple payers, commonality and free-riding in health care: Medicare and private payers.医疗保健中的多个支付方、共性与搭便车问题:医疗保险与私人支付方
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1049-69. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00078-4.