HealthNet Consult, Kampala, Uganda.
World Health Organization (WHO), Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern & Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):297-308. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.134.
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) availed opportunities for scaling up service coverage but called for stringent monitoring and evaluation (M&E) focusing mainly on MDG related programs. The Sustainable Development Goals 3 (SDGs) and the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda present a broader scope and require more sophisticated M&E systems. We assessed the readiness of low- and middle-income countries to monitor SDG 3.
Employing mixed methods, we reviewed health sector M&E plans of 6 countries in the World Health Organization (WHO) Africa Region to assess the challenges to M&E, the indicator selection pattern and the extent of multisectoral collaboration. Qualitative data were analysed using content thematic analysis while quantitative data were analysed using Excel.
Challenges to monitoring SDG 3 include weak institutional capacity; fragmentation of M&E functions; inadequate domestic financing; inadequate data availability, dissemination and utilization of M?&E products. The total number of indictors in the reviewed plans varied from 38 for Zimbabwe to 235 for Zanzibar. Sixty-nine percent of indicators for the Gambia and 89% for Zanzibar were not classified in any domain in the M&E results chain. Countries lay greater M&E emphasis on service delivery, health systems, maternal and child health as well as communicable diseases with a seeming neglect of the non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Inclusion of SDG 3 indicators only ranged from 48% for Zanzibar to 67% for Kenya. Although monitoring SDG 3 calls for multisectoral collaboration, consideration of the role of other sectors in the M&E plans was either absent or limited to the statistical departments.
There are common challenges confronting M&E at county-level. Countries have omitted key indicators for monitoring components of the SDG 3 targets especially those on NCDs and injuries. The role of other sectors in monitoring SDG 3 targets is not adequately reflected. These could be bottlenecks to tracking progress towards SDG 3 if not addressed. Beyond providing compendium of indicators to guide countries, we advocate for a more binding minimum set of indicators for all countries to which they may add depending on their context. Ministries of Health (MoHs) should prioritise M&E as an important pillar for health service planning and implementation and not as an add-on activity.
千年发展目标(MDGs)提供了扩大服务覆盖范围的机会,但需要严格的监测和评估(M&E),主要侧重于与 MDG 相关的方案。可持续发展目标 3(SDGs)和全民健康覆盖(UHC)议程提供了更广泛的范围,需要更复杂的 M&E 系统。我们评估了中低收入国家监测 SDG 3 的准备情况。
采用混合方法,我们审查了世界卫生组织(WHO)非洲区域 6 个国家的卫生部门 M&E 计划,以评估 M&E 面临的挑战、指标选择模式以及多部门合作的程度。使用内容主题分析对定性数据进行分析,同时使用 Excel 对定量数据进行分析。
监测 SDG 3 面临的挑战包括机构能力薄弱;M&E 职能分散;国内供资不足;数据可用性、传播和利用 M&E 产品不足。审查计划中的总指标数量从津巴布韦的 38 个到桑给巴尔的 235 个不等。冈比亚的 69%和桑给巴尔的 89%的指标在 M&E 结果链中没有分类到任何一个领域。各国更加重视服务提供、卫生系统、母婴健康以及传染病,而似乎忽视了非传染性疾病(NCDs)。纳入 SDG 3 指标的范围从桑给巴尔的 48%到肯尼亚的 67%不等。尽管监测 SDG 3 需要多部门合作,但在 M&E 计划中考虑其他部门的作用要么不存在,要么仅限于统计部门。
县一级的 M&E 面临着共同的挑战。各国在监测 SDG 3 目标的组成部分方面遗漏了关键指标,特别是那些与非传染性疾病和伤害有关的指标。其他部门在监测 SDG 3 目标方面的作用没有得到充分体现。如果这些问题得不到解决,可能会成为跟踪 SDG 3 进展的瓶颈。除了提供指标汇编以指导各国外,我们还主张为所有国家制定更具约束力的最低指标集,各国可以根据本国国情进行补充。卫生部应将 M&E 作为卫生服务规划和实施的重要支柱,而不是附加活动。