i3S/IPATIMUP, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.
IDENTIFICA, Science and Technology Park of the University of Porto - UPTEC, Rua Alfredo Allen, nº 455/461, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Sep;48:102333. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102333. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Forensic identification of species is in growing demand, particularly from law enforcement authorities in the areas of wildlife, fisheries and hunting as well as food authentication. Within the non-human forensic genetics expanding applications' field, the major current difficulties result from the lack of standards and genetic databases as well as the poor or absent taxonomic definition of several groups. Here we focus on a forensically important and overlooked problem in species identification: the exclusive use of uniparental markers, a common practice in current genetic barcoding methodologies, may lead to incorrect or impossible assignment whenever hybrids can occur (frequently, not only in domesticates, but also in the wild). For example, if one of these cases involves a mammal, and mitochondrial DNA alone is used (which in instances may be the only type of DNA sequence available in databases), the sample will be wrongfully assigned to the female parental species, completely missing the detection of a possible hybrid animal. The importance of this issue in the forensic contributions to food authentication, wildlife and conservation genetics is analyzed. We present a cautionary guidance on the forensic reporting of results avoiding this error.
物种的法医鉴定需求日益增长,特别是在野生动物、渔业和狩猎以及食品鉴定等领域的执法机构中。在非人类法医遗传学不断扩大应用的领域中,当前的主要困难源于缺乏标准和遗传数据库,以及几个群体的分类定义不完善或缺失。在这里,我们关注物种鉴定中一个被忽视但具有重要法医学意义的问题:在当前遗传条码方法中经常使用的单亲标记的排他性使用,可能导致在发生杂种(不仅在驯化种中,而且在野生种中也经常发生)时出现错误或不可能的归属。例如,如果这些情况涉及哺乳动物,并且仅使用线粒体 DNA(在某些情况下,这可能是数据库中唯一可用的 DNA 序列类型),则该样本将被错误地归属于雌性亲代物种,完全忽略了对可能的杂种动物的检测。分析了这个问题在法医对食品鉴定、野生动物和保护遗传学的贡献中的重要性。我们提出了关于避免这种错误的法医报告结果的警示性指导。