Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Oral Oncol. 2020 Nov;110:104845. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104845. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
To evaluate adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with minor or major extranodal extension (ENE).
Surgically resected OSCC with pathologically involved lymph node(s) (pN+) between 2006 and 2017. Sections of pN+ were re-reviewed and classified as no, minor (≤2 mm), or major (>2 mm) ENE. Patterns of failure and survival were compared between the groups and stratified by adjuvant treatment. Multivariable (MVA) analysis assessed the value of adjuvant treatment for minor and major ENE.
Total of 384 patients, 62 had minor and 114 had major ENE. Adjuvant CRT was delivered in 32(15%), 21(34%), and 45(39%) of patients with no, minor and major ENE, respectively. Patients with minor ENE had similar 5-year loco-regional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) but lower disease-free survival (DFS) (38% vs. 51%, p = 0·02) compared to patients with no ENE, while patients with major ENE had marginally lower LRC (59% vs 74%, p = 0·07), lower DC (58% vs 82%,p = 0·005) and DFS (13% vs. 38%, p=·001) compared to those with minor. On MVA, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS for major ENE (adjusted HR = 0·49; 95% CI 0·29-0·85, p = 0·01) but not for minor ENE after adjusting for age, ECOG status, T-, N-category, margin status, and radiotherapy.
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves outcomes in patients with major ENE, but the benefit is unclear in patients with minor ENE. Future trials should focus on intensification of treatment for patients with major ENE and alternative adjuvant strategies for patients with minor ENE.
评估伴有微小或广泛结外侵犯(ENE)的口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者的辅助放化疗(CRT)。
2006 年至 2017 年间手术切除的伴有病理累及淋巴结(pN+)的 OSCC。对 pN+的切片进行重新评估,并分类为无、微小(≤2mm)或广泛(>2mm)ENE。比较各组之间的失败模式和生存情况,并按辅助治疗进行分层。多变量(MVA)分析评估了辅助治疗对微小和广泛 ENE 的价值。
共 384 例患者,62 例有微小 ENE,114 例有广泛 ENE。无、微小和广泛 ENE 患者中分别有 32(15%)、21(34%)和 45(39%)例接受了辅助 CRT。微小 ENE 患者的局部区域控制(LRC)和远处控制(DC)相似,但无病生存率(DFS)较低(38%vs.51%,p=0.02),而广泛 ENE 患者的 LRC 略低(59%vs.74%,p=0.07),DC 较低(58%vs.82%,p=0.005)和 DFS 较低(13%vs.38%,p=0.001)。多变量分析显示,辅助化疗与广泛 ENE 患者的 DFS 改善相关(调整后的 HR=0.49;95%CI 0.29-0.85,p=0.01),但与微小 ENE 患者无关,调整年龄、ECOG 状态、T、N 分期、切缘状态和放疗后。
辅助放化疗可改善广泛 ENE 患者的预后,但对微小 ENE 患者的获益尚不明确。未来的试验应集中于强化广泛 ENE 患者的治疗,并为微小 ENE 患者提供替代辅助策略。