• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体合作、承载能力压力和群体间冲突。

Group Cooperation, Carrying-Capacity Stress, and Intergroup Conflict.

机构信息

Social, Economic, and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Making, Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Social, Economic, and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;24(9):760-776. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.005
PMID:32620334
Abstract

Peaceful intergroup relations deteriorate when individuals engage in parochial cooperation and parochial competition. To understand when and why intergroup relations change from peaceful to violent, we present a theoretical framework mapping out the different interdependence structures between groups. According to this framework, cooperation can lead to group expansion and ultimately to carrying-capacity stress. In such cases of endogenously created carrying-capacity stress, intergroup relations are more likely to become negatively interdependent, and parochial competition can emerge as a response. We discuss the cognitive, neural, and hormonal building blocks of parochial cooperation, and conclude that conflict between groups can be the inadvertent consequence of human preparedness - biological and cultural - to solve cooperation problems within groups.

摘要

当个人从事狭隘的合作和狭隘的竞争时,和平的群体间关系就会恶化。为了理解群体间关系何时以及为何从和平变为暴力,我们提出了一个理论框架,描绘了群体之间不同的相互依存结构。根据这一框架,合作可以导致群体扩张,最终导致承载能力压力。在这种由内生创造的承载能力压力的情况下,群体间关系更有可能变得相互依赖,狭隘的竞争可能会出现作为回应。我们讨论了狭隘合作的认知、神经和荷尔蒙组成部分,并得出结论,群体之间的冲突可能是人类准备解决群体内部合作问题的生物学和文化的意外后果。

相似文献

1
Group Cooperation, Carrying-Capacity Stress, and Intergroup Conflict.群体合作、承载能力压力和群体间冲突。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;24(9):760-776. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.群体形成与人类社会组织的演化。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):320-334. doi: 10.1177/17456916231179156. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Parochial cooperation in nested intergroup dilemmas is reduced when it harms out-groups.当内群体间困境中的局域合作会伤害到外群体时,这种合作会减少。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jun;114(6):909-923. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000125. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans.环境压力会增加人类对外群体的攻击和群体间的冲突。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210147. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0147. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Prosociality as a foundation for intergroup conflict.亲社会行为作为群体间冲突的基础。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
6
Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism.野生黑猩猩的局域合作:解释局域利他主义进化的模型。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210149. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0149. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Oxytocin reactivity during intergroup conflict in wild chimpanzees.野生黑猩猩群体间冲突时的催产素反应
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):268-273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616812114. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans.神经肽催产素调节人类群体间冲突中的狭隘利他主义。
Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1408-11. doi: 10.1126/science.1189047.
9
The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.人类群体间冲突与利他主义的进化相互作用:狭隘利他主义理论综述及其扩展前景
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1539.
10
Towards the elucidation of evolution of out-group aggression.旨在阐明外群体攻击的进化。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Aug 13;42:e133. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19000943.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociable glucocorticoid and noradrenergic effects on parochial cooperation and competition in intergroup conflict.糖皮质激素和去甲肾上腺素对群体间冲突中局部合作与竞争的不同影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2502257122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2502257122. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
EEG synchronisation reveals the impact of group identity and membership duration on social cognitive bias.脑电图同步揭示了群体身份和成员资格持续时间对社会认知偏差的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 3;15(1):23719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08191-z.
3
Discursive strategies of Chinese elders in intergenerational conflicts: A critical discourse analysis of mediation television programs in China.
中国老年人在代际冲突中的话语策略:对中国调解类电视节目的批判性话语分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0320909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320909. eCollection 2025.
4
Free mobility across group boundaries promotes intergroup cooperation.群体边界间的自由流动促进群体间合作。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 25;3(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00192-y.
5
The paradoxical brain: paradoxes impact conflict perspectives through increased neural alignment.矛盾的大脑:矛盾通过增加神经一致性来影响冲突观点。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae353.
6
Asymmetric Adaption in Social Learning: Understanding the Dilemma of Competition and Cooperation.社会学习中的不对称适应:理解竞争与合作的困境
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;14(8):721. doi: 10.3390/bs14080721.
7
Using artificial agents to nudge outgroup altruism and reduce ingroup favoritism in human-agent interaction.利用人工智能来推动群体间的利他行为,减少人际互动中的群体偏见。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;14(1):15850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64682-5.
8
The nasty neighbor effect in humans.人类中的讨厌邻居效应。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 28;10(26):eadm7968. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adm7968. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Signals of belonging: emergence of signalling norms as facilitators of trust and parochial cooperation.归属信号:信号规范作为信任和地方合作促进因素的出现。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230029. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0029. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
10
Partner choice and cooperation in social dilemmas can increase resource inequality.在社会困境中,合作对象的选择和合作行为可能会加剧资源不平等。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 13;14(1):6432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42128-2.