Suppr超能文献

活性物质菌株AQ10农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance   strain AQ10.

作者信息

Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Barmaz Stefania, Bellisai Giulia, Brancato Alba, Brocca Daniela, Bura Laszlo, Byers Harry, Chiusolo Arianna, Court Marques Daniele, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Erdos Zoltan, Fait Gabriella, Ferreira Lucien, Goumenou Marina, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Jose Oriol, Medina Paula, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Nougadere Alexandre, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Sacchi Angela, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Stanek Alois, Streissl Franz, Sturma Juergen, Szentes Csaba, Tarazona Jose, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Vagenende Benedicte, Verani Alessia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Dec 15;15(12):e05078. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5078. eCollection 2017 Dec.

Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, France, and the co-rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance   strain AQ10 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of   strain AQ10 as a fungicide by spraying against powdery mildew in grapes and spray applications in tomato, pepper and aubergine grown under protection or in the open field. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)报告了对报告成员国法国和共同报告成员国德国的主管当局就农药活性物质菌株AQ10开展的初始风险评估进行同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的。这些结论是在评估菌株AQ10作为杀菌剂在葡萄上防治白粉病的喷雾使用以及在保护地或露地种植的番茄、辣椒和茄子上的喷雾施用等代表性用途的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance   strain AQ10.
EFSA J. 2017 Dec 15;15(12):e05078. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5078. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance laminarin.
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 9;15(6):e04836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4836. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiophanate-methyl.
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):e05133. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5133. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain QST 713 (formerly strain QST 713).
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6381. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance zoxamide.
EFSA J. 2017 Sep 25;15(9):e04980. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4980. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fosetyl.
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 3;16(7):e05307. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5307. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxamyl.
EFSA J. 2022 May 18;20(5):e07296. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7296. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cyazofamid.
EFSA J. 2020 Sep 4;18(9):e06232. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6232. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mepanipyrim.
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 13;15(6):e04852. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4852. eCollection 2017 Jun.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance spinosad.
EFSA J. 2018 May 3;16(5):e05252. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5252. eCollection 2018 May.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验