Suppr超能文献

活性物质甲基硫菌灵农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiophanate-methyl.

作者信息

Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Barmaz Stefania, Bellisai Giulia, Brancato Alba, Brocca Daniela, Bura Laszlo, Byers Harry, Chiusolo Arianna, Court Marques Daniele, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Erdos Zoltan, Fait Gabriella, Ferreira Lucien, Goumenou Marina, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Jose Oriol, Medina Paula, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Nougadere Alexandre, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Sacchi Angela, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Stanek Alois, Streissl Franz, Sturma Juergen, Szentes Csaba, Tarazona Jose, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Vagenende Benedicte, Verani Alessia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):e05133. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5133. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Sweden, and co-rapporteur Member State, Finland, for the pesticide active substance thiophanate-methyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of thiophanate-methyl as a fungicide on wine grapes, tomato, aubergine, leek, fresh beans with pods and wheat (winter and durum). The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国瑞典和联合报告成员国芬兰的主管当局就农药活性物质甲基硫菌灵进行的初始风险评估进行同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的。这些结论是在评估甲基硫菌灵作为杀菌剂在酿酒葡萄、番茄、茄子、韭菜、带荚鲜豆和小麦(冬小麦和硬质小麦)上的代表性用途的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiophanate-methyl.
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):e05133. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5133. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tribenuron-methyl.
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 28;15(7):e04912. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4912. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorothalonil.
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 30;16(1):e05126. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5126. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tolclofos-methyl.
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 29;16(1):e05130. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5130. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance zoxamide.
EFSA J. 2017 Sep 25;15(9):e04980. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4980. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mepanipyrim.
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 13;15(6):e04852. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4852. eCollection 2017 Jun.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance   strain AQ10.
EFSA J. 2017 Dec 15;15(12):e05078. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5078. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metrafenone.
EFSA J. 2023 May 22;21(5):e08012. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8012. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance folpet.
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 18;21(8):e08139. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8139. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mancozeb.
EFSA J. 2020 Dec 16;18(12):e05755. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5755. eCollection 2020 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the potential of synthetic and biological fungicides for managing the fungus-farming ambrosia beetle Xylosandrus compactus.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0329063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329063. eCollection 2025.
3
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 55th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 18;22(7):e8841. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Nano-Agrochemicals as Substitutes for Pesticides: Prospects and Risks.
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;13(1):109. doi: 10.3390/plants13010109.
6
Organic and Conventional Bean Pesticides in Development of Autochthonous Strains.
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Jun 3;8(6):603. doi: 10.3390/jof8060603.
8
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 30;16(7):e05306. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5306. eCollection 2018 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验