Suppr超能文献

在《动物卫生法》(欧盟第2016/429号条例)框架内对动物疾病进行列名和分类的评估:地方流行性牛白血病(EBL)。

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL).

作者信息

More Simon, Bøtner Anette, Butterworth Andrew, Calistri Paolo, Depner Klaus, Edwards Sandra, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Good Margaret, Gortázar Schmidt Christian, Michel Virginie, Miranda Miguel Angel, Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Raj Mohan, Sihvonen Liisa, Spoolder Hans, Stegeman Jan Arend, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Velarde Antonio, Willeberg Preben, Winckler Christoph, Baldinelli Francesca, Broglia Alessandro, Beltrán-Beck Beatriz, Kohnle Lisa, Bicout Dominique

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Aug 4;15(8):e04956. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4956. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Enzootic bovine leucosis (EBL) has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of EBL to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of EBL according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to EBL. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, it is inconclusive whether EBL can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no full consensus on the criteria 5 B(i) and 5 B(iii). Consequently, since it is inconclusive whether EBL can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL, then the assessment on compliance of EBL with the criteria as in Sections 4 and 5 of Annex IV to the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 9(1), and which animal species can be considered to be listed for EBL according to Article 8(3) of the AHL is also inconclusive.

摘要

已根据《动物卫生法》(AHL)的标准对地方流行性牛白血病(EBL)进行了评估,特别是关于疾病概况和影响的第7条标准、关于EBL列入资格的第5条、根据附件IV中的疾病预防和控制规则对EBL进行分类的第9条以及关于与EBL相关的动物种类清单的第8条。评估采用了一种由信息收集和汇编、对每个标准进行个人专家判断组成的方法,如果之前未达成共识,还包括集体层面的判断。输出结果包括分类答案,对于未达成共识的问题,报告了不同的支持观点。在一份单独的意见中解释了用于此次评估的方法细节。根据所进行的评估,对于EBL是否可被视为符合AHL第5(3)条规定的列入欧盟干预清单的资格尚无定论,因为在标准5 B(i)和5 B(iii)上未达成完全共识。因此,由于对于EBL是否可被视为符合AHL第5(3)条规定的列入欧盟干预清单的资格尚无定论,那么对于EBL是否符合AHL附件IV第4和5节中的标准,以适用第9(1)条(d)和(e)点所述的疾病预防和控制规则,以及根据AHL第8(3)条哪些动物种类可被视为列入EBL清单的评估也尚无定论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7009913/1f28cd943c62/EFS2-15-e04956-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验