• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于与辅食引入年龄相关健康结果的系统评价方案,用于科学评估婴儿饮食中引入辅食的适宜年龄。

Protocol for a systematic review on health outcomes related to the age of introduction of complementary food for the scientific assessment of the appropriate age of introduction of complementary feeding into an infant's diet.

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Aug 14;15(8):e04969. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4969. eCollection 2017 Aug.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4969
PMID:32625630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009927/
Abstract

In 2016, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) received a mandate from the European Commission to update its 2009 opinion on the appropriate age for introduction of complementary feeding of infants. In order to retrieve data on health outcomes related to the age of introduction of complementary food, a systematic literature review will be conducted in line with the EFSA guidance on the application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. These data will be considered together with data on the nutritional adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding or formula feeding at different ages and with data on neuromuscular, gastrointestinal and renal development which may affect the capacity of the infant to introduce non-milk foods in the diet as the basis for the scientific assessment. This protocol serves as a basis for conducting the systematic literature search aiming to retrieve data on health outcomes related to the age of introduction of complementary food. As EFSA wished to seek advice from stakeholders on the draft protocol for the systematic literature review, the NDA Panel endorsed the draft protocol for public consultation on 1 February 2017. The consultation was open from 16 February to 23 March 2017 (5 weeks).

摘要

2016年,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)接到欧盟委员会的指令,要求更新其2009年关于婴儿引入辅食适宜年龄的意见。为获取与辅食引入年龄相关的健康结果数据,将根据EFSA关于将系统评价方法应用于食品和饲料安全评估以支持决策的指南,开展一项系统文献综述。这些数据将与不同年龄纯母乳喂养或配方奶喂养的营养充足性数据,以及可能影响婴儿在饮食中引入非奶类食物能力的神经肌肉、胃肠道和肾脏发育数据一同考虑,作为科学评估的基础。本方案作为开展系统文献检索的基础,旨在获取与辅食引入年龄相关的健康结果数据。由于EFSA希望就系统文献综述的方案草案征求利益相关方的意见,营养与新食品专家组于2017年2月1日批准了供公众咨询的方案草案。咨询于2017年2月16日至3月23日开放(为期5周)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/923e/7009927/3c836ef9851a/EFS2-15-e04969-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/923e/7009927/3c836ef9851a/EFS2-15-e04969-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/923e/7009927/3c836ef9851a/EFS2-15-e04969-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review on health outcomes related to the age of introduction of complementary food for the scientific assessment of the appropriate age of introduction of complementary feeding into an infant's diet.关于与辅食引入年龄相关健康结果的系统评价方案,用于科学评估婴儿饮食中引入辅食的适宜年龄。
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 14;15(8):e04969. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4969. eCollection 2017 Aug.
2
3
4
5
Appropriate age at solid introduction: is EFSA extending the individualised window on a sounding scientific evidence?固体食物引入的适当年龄:EFSA 是否在扩大基于充分科学证据的个体化窗口?
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Mar;72(2):145-147. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2020.1777536. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
7
Protocol for the scientific opinion on the Tolerable Upper Intake Level of dietary sugars.关于膳食糖可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见拟定方案。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 10;16(8):e05393. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5393. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
Appropriate age range for introduction of complementary feeding into an infant's diet.在婴儿饮食中引入辅食的适宜年龄范围。
EFSA J. 2019 Sep 12;17(9):e05780. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5780. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Factors Affecting Complementary Feeding of Infants. A Pilot Study Conducted after the Introduction of New Infant Feeding Guidelines in Poland.影响婴儿补充喂养的因素。在波兰推出新的婴儿喂养指南后的一项试点研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 28;13(1):61. doi: 10.3390/nu13010061.
10
Complementary feeding adequacy in relation to nutritional status among early weaned breastfed children who are born to HIV-infected mothers: ANRS 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.感染艾滋病毒母亲所生早期断奶母乳喂养儿童的辅食添加充足情况与营养状况的关系:法国国家艾滋病研究机构1201/1202号Ditrame Plus项目,科特迪瓦阿比让
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e701-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1911.

引用本文的文献

1
Breastfeeding and complementary feeding in fragile settings: the case of Syrian refugees and their host communities in North Lebanon.脆弱环境中的母乳喂养和补充喂养:以黎巴嫩北部的叙利亚难民及其收容社区为例。
Int Breastfeed J. 2022 May 14;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00480-x.
2
Appropriate age range for introduction of complementary feeding into an infant's diet.在婴儿饮食中引入辅食的适宜年龄范围。
EFSA J. 2019 Sep 12;17(9):e05780. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5780. eCollection 2019 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition.辅食添加:欧洲儿科胃肠病、肝病和营养学会(ESPGHAN)营养委员会立场文件
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Jan;64(1):119-132. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454.
2
Age of introduction of first complementary feeding for infants: a systematic review.婴儿首次引入辅食的年龄:一项系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Sep 2;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0409-5.
3
Timing of the introduction of complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review.
补充喂养的引入时间与儿童肥胖风险:系统综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Oct;37(10):1295-306. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.99. Epub 2013 May 27.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
5
Complementary feeding: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition.辅食添加:欧洲儿科胃肠病、肝病和营养学会营养委员会评论
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Jan;46(1):99-110. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000304464.60788.bd.
6
Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.在存在发表偏倚和研究间异质性的情况下,修剪和填充方法的性能。
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.2889.
7
Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.在荟萃分析中估算缺失的标准差可以提供准确的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;59(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006.
8
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.评估荟萃分析中的异质性
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
9
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.在荟萃分析中量化异质性。
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
10
Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.修剪与填充:一种基于漏斗图的简单方法,用于在荟萃分析中检测和校正发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x.