Dhillon Gurmeet K, Hunt Michael A, Reid Andrea L, Esculier Jean-Francois
Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Jun 30;6(1):e000767. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000767. eCollection 2020.
There is a gap in research exploring perceptions of runners and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about running footwear and injury risk. The objectives of this study were: (1) to document factors considered by runners when selecting footwear; (2) to compare perceptions on footwear and injury risk in runners and HCPs; and (3) to evaluate the perceived usefulness of an online educational module.
Using an online survey, we collected information on demographics and perceptions about footwear and injury risk. Runners reported their footwear selection strategy, and HCPs their typical recommendations. An evidence-based educational module was presented, and participants rated its usefulness.
The survey was completed by 2442 participants, of which 1035 completed the optional postmodule questions. Runners reported relying mostly on comfort and advice from retailers when selecting shoes. Perceptions regarding the effects of specific footwear types (minimalist, maximalist), characteristics (softness, drop) and selection strategy (foot type, transition) on biomechanics and injury risk were different between HCPs and runners. Overall, runners perceived footwear as more important to prevent injury than did HCPs (7.6/10, 99% CI 7.4 to 7.7 vs 6.2/10, 99% CI 6.0 to 6.5; p<0.001). Both runners (8.1/10, 99% CI 7.9 to 8.3) and HCPs (8.7/10, 99% CI 8.6 to 8.9) found the educational module useful. A majority of respondents indicated the module changed their perceptions.
Footwear is perceived as important in reducing running injury risk. This online module was deemed useful in educating about footwear evidence. Future studies should evaluate if changes in perceptions can translate to behaviour change and, ultimately, reduced injury risk.
在探索跑步者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对跑鞋及受伤风险的看法方面,研究存在空白。本研究的目的是:(1)记录跑步者选择跑鞋时考虑的因素;(2)比较跑步者和医疗保健专业人员对跑鞋及受伤风险的看法;(3)评估在线教育模块的感知有用性。
通过在线调查,我们收集了有关人口统计学以及对跑鞋和受伤风险看法的信息。跑步者报告他们的跑鞋选择策略,医疗保健专业人员报告他们的典型建议。展示了一个基于证据的教育模块,参与者对其有用性进行评分。
2442名参与者完成了调查,其中1035人完成了模块后的可选问题。跑步者报告在选择鞋子时主要依赖舒适度和零售商的建议。医疗保健专业人员和跑步者对特定鞋类类型(极简主义、极致主义)、特征(柔软度、落差)和选择策略(脚型、过渡)对生物力学和受伤风险的影响的看法有所不同。总体而言,跑步者认为跑鞋对预防受伤比医疗保健专业人员更重要(7.6/10,99%CI 7.4至7.7 vs 6.2/10,99%CI 6.0至6.5;p<0.001)。跑步者(8.1/10,99%CI 7.9至8.3)和医疗保健专业人员(8.7/10,99%CI 8.6至8.9)都认为教育模块有用。大多数受访者表示该模块改变了他们的看法。
跑鞋被认为对降低跑步受伤风险很重要。这个在线模块被认为在提供有关跑鞋证据的教育方面很有用。未来的研究应评估看法的改变是否能转化为行为改变,并最终降低受伤风险。