Suppr超能文献

跑步者和医疗保健专业人员对跑鞋与跑步受伤风险有哪些看法?

What are the perceptions of runners and healthcare professionals on footwear and running injury risk?

作者信息

Dhillon Gurmeet K, Hunt Michael A, Reid Andrea L, Esculier Jean-Francois

机构信息

Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Jun 30;6(1):e000767. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000767. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is a gap in research exploring perceptions of runners and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about running footwear and injury risk. The objectives of this study were: (1) to document factors considered by runners when selecting footwear; (2) to compare perceptions on footwear and injury risk in runners and HCPs; and (3) to evaluate the perceived usefulness of an online educational module.

METHODS

Using an online survey, we collected information on demographics and perceptions about footwear and injury risk. Runners reported their footwear selection strategy, and HCPs their typical recommendations. An evidence-based educational module was presented, and participants rated its usefulness.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 2442 participants, of which 1035 completed the optional postmodule questions. Runners reported relying mostly on comfort and advice from retailers when selecting shoes. Perceptions regarding the effects of specific footwear types (minimalist, maximalist), characteristics (softness, drop) and selection strategy (foot type, transition) on biomechanics and injury risk were different between HCPs and runners. Overall, runners perceived footwear as more important to prevent injury than did HCPs (7.6/10, 99% CI 7.4 to 7.7 vs 6.2/10, 99% CI 6.0 to 6.5; p<0.001). Both runners (8.1/10, 99% CI 7.9 to 8.3) and HCPs (8.7/10, 99% CI 8.6 to 8.9) found the educational module useful. A majority of respondents indicated the module changed their perceptions.

CONCLUSION

Footwear is perceived as important in reducing running injury risk. This online module was deemed useful in educating about footwear evidence. Future studies should evaluate if changes in perceptions can translate to behaviour change and, ultimately, reduced injury risk.

摘要

目的

在探索跑步者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对跑鞋及受伤风险的看法方面,研究存在空白。本研究的目的是:(1)记录跑步者选择跑鞋时考虑的因素;(2)比较跑步者和医疗保健专业人员对跑鞋及受伤风险的看法;(3)评估在线教育模块的感知有用性。

方法

通过在线调查,我们收集了有关人口统计学以及对跑鞋和受伤风险看法的信息。跑步者报告他们的跑鞋选择策略,医疗保健专业人员报告他们的典型建议。展示了一个基于证据的教育模块,参与者对其有用性进行评分。

结果

2442名参与者完成了调查,其中1035人完成了模块后的可选问题。跑步者报告在选择鞋子时主要依赖舒适度和零售商的建议。医疗保健专业人员和跑步者对特定鞋类类型(极简主义、极致主义)、特征(柔软度、落差)和选择策略(脚型、过渡)对生物力学和受伤风险的影响的看法有所不同。总体而言,跑步者认为跑鞋对预防受伤比医疗保健专业人员更重要(7.6/10,99%CI 7.4至7.7 vs 6.2/10,99%CI 6.0至6.5;p<0.001)。跑步者(8.1/10,99%CI 7.9至8.3)和医疗保健专业人员(8.7/10,99%CI 8.6至8.9)都认为教育模块有用。大多数受访者表示该模块改变了他们的看法。

结论

跑鞋被认为对降低跑步受伤风险很重要。这个在线模块被认为在提供有关跑鞋证据的教育方面很有用。未来的研究应评估看法的改变是否能转化为行为改变,并最终降低受伤风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/7328975/6fc3acf6d125/bmjsem-2020-000767f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验