Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, the Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, the Netherlands.
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105656. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105656. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
One of the main aims of introducing automation in transport is to improve safety by reducing or eliminating human errors; it is often argued however that this may induce new types of errors. There is different level of maturity with automation in different transport modes (road, aviation, maritime and rail), however no systematic research has been conducted on the lessons learned in different sectors, so that they can be exploited for the design of safer automated systems. The aim of this paper is to review the impact of key human factors on the safety of automated transport systems, with focus on relevant experiences from different transport sectors. A systematic literature review is carried out on the following topics: the level of trust in automation - in particular the impact of mis-aligned trust, i.e. mistrust vs overreliance, the resulting impact on operator situation awareness (SA), the implications for takeover control from machine to human, and the role of experience and training on using automated transport systems. The results revealed several areas where experiences from the aviation and road domain can be transferable to other sectors. Experiences from maritime and rail transport, although limited, tend to confirm the general patterns. Remarkably, in the road sector where higher levels of automation are only recently introduced, there are clearer and more quantitative approaches to human factors, while other sectors focus only on mental modes. Other sectors could use similar approaches to define their own context-specific metrics. The paper makes a synthesis of key messages on automation safety in different transport sectors, and presents an assessment of their transferability.
引入自动化运输的主要目的之一是通过减少或消除人为错误来提高安全性;然而,人们常常认为这可能会引发新的错误类型。不同运输模式(道路、航空、航海和铁路)的自动化程度存在不同的成熟度,但没有针对不同部门的经验教训进行系统研究,以便将其用于设计更安全的自动化系统。本文的目的是审查关键人为因素对自动化运输系统安全的影响,重点关注不同运输部门的相关经验。对以下主题进行了系统的文献回顾:对自动化的信任程度 - 特别是信任错位的影响,即不信任与过度依赖,对操作人员态势感知(SA)的影响,从机器到人的接管控制的影响,以及经验和培训对使用自动化运输系统的影响。结果揭示了一些可以将航空和道路领域的经验转移到其他领域的领域。尽管航海和铁路运输的经验有限,但往往证实了一般模式。值得注意的是,在道路运输领域,最近才引入了更高水平的自动化,对人为因素的方法更加清晰和定量,而其他领域仅关注心理模式。其他领域可以使用类似的方法来定义自己特定于上下文的指标。本文综合了不同运输部门自动化安全方面的关键信息,并对其可转移性进行了评估。