Suppr超能文献

蜱虫体表去污方法分析

Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods.

作者信息

Hoffmann Angeline, Fingerle Volker, Noll Matthias

机构信息

Institute for Bioanalysis, Department of Applied Sciences, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 96450 Coburg, Germany.

Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), National Reference Center for Borrelia, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2020 Jun 30;8(7):987. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8070987.

Abstract

Various microbial pathogens have been found in ticks such as . However, most studies assessed tick microbiomes without prior decontamination of the tick surface, which may alter the results and mislead conclusions regarding the composition of the tick-borne microbiome. The aim of this study was to test four different decontamination methods, namely (i.) 70% ethanol, (ii.) DNA Away, (iii.) 5% sodium hypochlorite and (iv.) Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL), which have been previously reported for tick surface and animal or human skin decontamination. To test the efficiency of decontamination, we contaminated each tick with a defined mixture of , , , dog saliva and human sweat. No contamination was used as a negative control, and for a positive control, a no decontamination strategy was carried out. After nucleic acid extraction, the recovery rate of contaminants was determined for RNA and DNA samples by qPCR and tick-borne microbiome analyses by bacterial 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Ticks treated with 5% sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest number of contaminants followed by DNA Away, RSDL and 70% ethanol. Moreover, tick microbiomes after 5% sodium hypochlorite decontamination clustered with negative controls. Therefore, the efficiency of decontamination was optimal with 5% sodium hypochlorite and is recommended for upcoming studies to address the unbiased detection of tick-borne pathogens.

摘要

在蜱虫中发现了多种微生物病原体,如 。然而,大多数研究在未事先对蜱虫表面进行去污处理的情况下评估蜱虫微生物组,这可能会改变结果并误导有关蜱传微生物组组成的结论。本研究的目的是测试四种不同的去污方法,即(i.)70%乙醇、(ii.)DNA Away、(iii.)5%次氯酸钠和(iv.)活性皮肤去污乳液(RSDL),这些方法先前已报道用于蜱虫表面以及动物或人类皮肤的去污。为了测试去污效率,我们用 、 、 、狗唾液和人类汗液的特定混合物污染每只蜱虫。不进行污染作为阴性对照,而作为阳性对照,则采用不进行去污的策略。核酸提取后,通过qPCR测定RNA和DNA样本中污染物的回收率,并通过细菌16S rRNA和细菌16S rRNA基因扩增子测序对蜱传微生物组进行分析。用5%次氯酸钠处理的蜱虫显示出的污染物数量最少,其次是DNA Away、RSDL和70%乙醇。此外,5%次氯酸钠去污后的蜱虫微生物组与阴性对照聚集在一起。因此,5%次氯酸钠的去污效率最佳,建议在未来的研究中用于无偏检测蜱传病原体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a50/7409031/a042e552f544/microorganisms-08-00987-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验