Savage Kevin T, Brant Elena Gonzalez, Rosales Santillan Monica, Morss Peyton C, Salian Prerna, Flood Kelsey S, Porter Martina L, Kimball Alexa B
Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, MA, United States.
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020 Feb 25;6(3):159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.02.007. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Methotrexate is an immunomodulatory therapy that may offer benefit to patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Despite its theoretical advantages, there is a paucity of available data regarding long-term methotrexate use in patients with HS.
This study aimed to assess whether methotrexate treatment leads to improvement in HS disease severity.
We conducted an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review of patients with HS who were treated with methotrexate between 2000 and 2018. Primary outcome measurements included the HS Physician's Global Assessment (HS PGA), Hurley staging, abscess count, fistula count, and inflammatory nodule count.
A total of 29 patients were identified; 14 were excluded for reasons including never starting methotrexate and missing follow-up data. For remaining patients (n = 15), the average cumulative dose of methotrexate was 520.1 mg (range, 30-1665 mg) and the average length of treatment was 11.7 months (range, 1-38 months). Patients taking methotrexate as a primary therapy had a higher cumulative dose and length of treatment (520.13 mg; 14.6 months) compared with those taking biologics concomitantly (468.44 mg; 9.1 months). Patients using methotrexate as primary therapy demonstrated nonsignificant reductions in HS PGA, inflammatory nodule count, and abscess count. Patients on concomitant biologic therapy failed to demonstrate any change in HS PGA, inflammatory nodule count, and abscess count.
Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature, small sample size, length of time on methotrexate between groups, and homogeneity of the patient population.
Methotrexate may represent an effective treatment option in older patients with lower body mass indices but fails to offer benefit in patients taking concurrent biologic therapy.
甲氨蝶呤是一种免疫调节疗法,可能对化脓性汗腺炎(HS)患者有益。尽管其具有理论上的优势,但关于HS患者长期使用甲氨蝶呤的数据却很匮乏。
本研究旨在评估甲氨蝶呤治疗是否能改善HS的疾病严重程度。
我们对2000年至2018年间接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的HS患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性病历审查。主要结局指标包括HS医生整体评估(HS PGA)、赫尔利分期、脓肿计数、瘘管计数和炎性结节计数。
共确定了29例患者;14例因从未开始使用甲氨蝶呤和缺少随访数据等原因被排除。对于其余患者(n = 15),甲氨蝶呤的平均累积剂量为520.1 mg(范围为30-1665 mg),平均治疗时长为11.7个月(范围为1-38个月)。与同时使用生物制剂的患者相比,将甲氨蝶呤作为主要治疗方法的患者累积剂量更高、治疗时间更长(分别为520.13 mg;14.6个月和468.44 mg;9.1个月)。将甲氨蝶呤作为主要治疗方法的患者在HS PGA、炎性结节计数和脓肿计数方面有不显著的降低。同时接受生物治疗的患者在HS PGA、炎性结节计数和脓肿计数方面未显示出任何变化。
本研究的局限性包括其回顾性性质、样本量小、各组间使用甲氨蝶呤的时间长度以及患者群体的同质性。
甲氨蝶呤可能是体重指数较低的老年患者的一种有效治疗选择,但对同时接受生物治疗的患者没有益处。