Suppr超能文献

通过酶联免疫吸附测定法检测抗b型流感嗜血杆菌荚膜多糖抗体

Measurement of anti-Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide antibodies by ELISA.

作者信息

Barra A, Schulz D, Aucouturier P, Preud'homme J L

机构信息

Laboratory of Immunology and Immunopathology (CNRS UA 1172), Marcy l'Etoile, France.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 1988 Nov 25;115(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90317-1.

Abstract

Measurement of antibodies to the capsular polysaccharide polyribosylribitolphosphate (PRP) of Haemophilus influenzae type b by ELISA is made difficult by the poor binding of this antigen to the solid phase. Six coating conditions were compared using immune and non-immune human sera. Direct coating with PRP was inefficient. Precoating with protamine or poly-L-lysine (PLL) yielded irreproducible results and high background levels. Assays with PRP conjugated with PLL as coat were not sensitive enough. In addition, anti-PRP antibodies, especially those belonging to the IgM class, crossreacted with PLL. Coating with avidin or streptavidin followed by incubation with biotin-coupled PRP was not satisfactory either, due to binding of certain sera in the absence of PRP. Coating with PRP coupled to tyramine resulted in low backgrounds and acceptable specific binding levels. However, the finding that the binding of a few sera was only partially inhibited by soluble PRP led us to include an inhibition step in every experiment. Only optical densities inhibited by the antigen were taken into account. In view of the lack of parallelism of dilution curves from different sera, no attempt was made to express the results in weight units. They were expressed in arbitrary units calculated by comparison with internal standards. Under such conditions, the assay permitted a reproducible (interassay coefficients of variation around 10%) determination of PRP-Ab belonging to the various immunoglobulin classes and IgG subclasses and showed a good correlation with results obtained using the Farr assay.

摘要

通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测b型流感嗜血杆菌荚膜多糖多聚核糖基核糖醇磷酸酯(PRP)抗体存在困难,因为该抗原与固相的结合性较差。使用免疫和非免疫人血清比较了六种包被条件。直接用PRP包被效率低下。用鱼精蛋白或聚-L-赖氨酸(PLL)预包被产生的结果不可重复且背景水平高。以与PLL偶联的PRP作为包被物的检测方法灵敏度不够。此外,抗PRP抗体,尤其是属于IgM类的抗体,与PLL发生交叉反应。用抗生物素蛋白或链霉抗生物素蛋白包被,然后与生物素偶联的PRP孵育也不理想,因为在没有PRP的情况下某些血清会发生结合。用与酪胺偶联的PRP包被导致背景较低且特异性结合水平可接受。然而,少数血清的结合仅被可溶性PRP部分抑制这一发现促使我们在每个实验中都加入抑制步骤。只考虑被抗原抑制的光密度。鉴于不同血清稀释曲线缺乏平行性,未尝试以重量单位表示结果。结果以与内标比较计算得出的任意单位表示。在这种条件下,该检测方法能够对属于各种免疫球蛋白类别和IgG亚类的PRP-Ab进行可重复的测定(批间变异系数约为10%),并且与使用Farr检测法获得的结果具有良好的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验