• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人类作业模型(MOHO)的强化个体安置和支持(IPS)干预;一项前瞻性队列研究。

An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger & Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02745-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02745-3
PMID:32641009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7346406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Employment is good for physical and mental health, however people with severe mental illness (SMI) are often excluded from employment. Standard Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is effective in supporting around 55% of people with SMI into employment or education. Current research considers enhancements to IPS to improve outcomes for those requiring more complex interventions. Clinicians need to better understand who will benefit from these enhanced IPS interventions. This study offers a new enhanced IPS intervention and an approach to predicting who may achieve successful outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included people with SMI who participated in an enhanced IPS service and had prolonged absence from employment. Secondary data analysis was conducted of data gathered in routine clinical practice. Univariate analysis coupled with previous research and clinical consultation was used to select variables to be included in the initial model, followed by a backward stepwise approach to model building for the final multiple logistic regression model with an outcome of successful or unsuccessful goal attainment (employment or education).

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent of participants in the enhanced IPS successfully attained employment or education. Significant relationships from bivariate analyses were identified between outcomes (employment or education) and seven psychosocial variables. Adapting Routines to Minimise Difficulties, Work Related Goals, and Living in an Area of Lesser Deprivation were found to be significant in predicting employment or education in the final multiple logistic regression model R = 0.16 (Hosmer-Lemeshow), 0.19 (Cox-Snell), 0.26 (Nagelkerke). Model χ(7) = 41.38 p < .001.

CONCLUSION

An enhanced IPS service had a 63% rate success in achieving employment or education, higher than comparable studies and provides an alternative to IPS-Lite and IPS-standard for more complex populations. Motivational and habitual psychosocial variables are helpful in predicting who may benefit from an enhanced IPS intervention supporting people after prolonged absence from employment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04083404 Registered 05 September 2019 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

就业有益于身心健康,但患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人往往被排除在就业之外。标准的个体安置和支持(IPS)在支持约 55%的 SMI 患者就业或接受教育方面非常有效。目前的研究考虑对 IPS 进行增强,以改善需要更复杂干预措施的人的结果。临床医生需要更好地了解谁将从这些增强的 IPS 干预中受益。本研究提供了一种新的增强 IPS 干预措施和一种预测谁可能获得成功结果的方法。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究包括参加增强 IPS 服务且长期失业的 SMI 患者。对常规临床实践中收集的数据进行了二次数据分析。采用单变量分析结合以往的研究和临床咨询,选择变量纳入初始模型,然后采用向后逐步法构建最终的多逻辑回归模型,以成功或不成功的目标实现(就业或教育)为结果。

结果

增强 IPS 组的 63%参与者成功实现了就业或教育。从双变量分析中确定了与结果(就业或教育)相关的七个心理社会变量之间存在显著关系。适应常规以最小化困难、与工作相关的目标以及生活在较少贫困地区被发现是预测最终多逻辑回归模型中就业或教育的重要因素(R=0.16[Hosmer-Lemeshow],0.19[Cox-Snell],0.26[Nagelkerke])。模型 χ(7)=41.38 p<.001。

结论

增强 IPS 服务实现就业或教育的成功率为 63%,高于可比研究,为更复杂人群提供了 IPS-Lite 和 IPS-standard 的替代方案。动机和习惯性心理社会变量有助于预测谁可能从增强 IPS 干预中受益,支持长期失业的人。

试验注册

NCT04083404 于 2019 年 9 月 5 日(回顾性注册)注册。

相似文献

1
An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study.基于人类作业模型(MOHO)的强化个体安置和支持(IPS)干预;一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02745-3.
2
Effects of Individual Placement and Support Supplemented With Cognitive Remediation and Work-Focused Social Skills Training for People With Severe Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.个体安置与支持联合认知矫正及以工作为导向的社交技能训练对严重精神疾病患者的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1232-1240. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2291.
3
Predictors of work and education among people with severe mental illness who participated in the Danish individual placement and support study: findings from a randomized clinical trial.参与丹麦个体安置和支持研究的严重精神疾病患者的工作和教育预测因素:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;56(9):1669-1677. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02107-8. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
INdividual Vocational and Educational Support Trial (INVEST) for young people with borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.个体职业和教育支持试验(INVEST)用于边缘型人格障碍的年轻人:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04471-3.
5
Evaluation of an implementation strategy for Individual Placement and Support in the Netherlands: a 30-month observational study.个体安置与支持实施策略在荷兰的评估:一项为期 30 个月的观察性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04121-9.
6
Effect of Evidence-Based Supported Employment vs Transitional Work on Achieving Steady Work Among Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于证据的支持性就业与过渡性工作对创伤后应激障碍退伍军人实现稳定工作的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):316-324. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4472.
7
Individual placement and support in Sweden - a randomized controlled trial.瑞典的个体安置与支持——一项随机对照试验
Nord J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;69(1):57-66. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2014.929739. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
8
Outcomes of Peer-Provided Individual Placement and Support Services in a Mental Health Peer-Run Vocational Program.心理健康朋辈运营职业项目中朋辈提供的个体安置和支持服务的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 May 1;74(5):480-487. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220134. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Individual Placement and Support supplemented with cognitive remediation and work-related social skills training in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.丹麦的个体安置与支持辅以认知康复及与工作相关的社交技能培训:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jun 21;16:280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0792-0.
10
The effect evaluation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for patients with substance use disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of IPS versus enhanced self-help.个体安置和支持(IPS)对物质使用障碍患者的效果评价:IPS 与增强自助对照随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 15;22(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05673-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of the IPS employment specialist role in the context of Nav employment in Norway.一项关于挪威导航就业背景下IPS就业专家角色的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 23;25(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06991-1.
2
Increasing occupational participation: A qualitative analysis within the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program.提高职业参与度:“职业自我分析”项目中的质性分析
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Apr;86(4):275-283. doi: 10.1177/03080226221145389. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Occupational therapy in mental health, India: a commentary on under-explored potentials.印度心理健康领域的职业疗法:关于未充分发掘潜力的评论
Discov Ment Health. 2025 May 6;5(1):70. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00157-x.
4
Superiority and cost-effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support versus standard employment support for people with alcohol and drug dependence: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.个体安置与支持相对于酒精和药物依赖者标准就业支持的优越性及成本效益:一项实用、平行组、开放标签、多中心、随机、对照的3期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 18;68:102400. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102400. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Perspectives on implementing Individual Placement and Support (IPS) within primary health care settings for adults living in British Columbia, Canada.关于在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的基层医疗环境中为成年人实施个体安置与支持(IPS)的观点。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05395-3.
6
Supported employment interventions for workplace mental health of persons with mental disabilities in low-to-middle income countries: A scoping review.支持性就业干预措施对中低收入国家精神残疾人士职场心理健康的影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291869. eCollection 2023.
7
Subjective perceptions that affect the continued employment of persons with mental disabilities in Japan: A mixed-methods study.影响日本精神残疾人士继续就业的主观认知:一项混合方法研究。
Work. 2023;75(2):711-727. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220144.
8
Assessing Continued Employability among People with Mental Illnesses: Development of a Scale in Japan.评估精神疾病患者的持续就业能力:日本量表的开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214786.
9
Implementing individual placement and support (IPS): the experiences of employment specialists in the early implementation phase of IPS in Northern Norway. The IPSNOR study.实施个体安置与支持(IPS):在挪威北部 IPS 早期实施阶段就业专家的经验。IPSNOR 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03644-x.
10
Occupational therapy interventions for adults with severe mental illness: a scoping review.职业治疗干预对严重精神疾病成人的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 29;11(10):e047467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047467.

本文引用的文献

1
Operational Definition of Serious Mental Illness: Heterogeneity in a Review of the Research on Quality-of-Life Interventions.严重精神疾病的操作定义:生活质量干预研究综述中的异质性
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2020 May/Jun;26(3):229-244. doi: 10.1177/1078390320902823. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support.支持性就业:个体安置与支持的随机对照试验的荟萃分析和综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212208. eCollection 2019.
3
Evidence for Occupational Therapy Intervention With Employment and Education for Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人进行职业治疗干预以促进就业和教育的证据:一项系统综述。
Am J Occup Ther. 2018 Sep/Oct;72(5):7205190010p1-7205190010p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.033068.
4
Comparing predictors of employment in Individual Placement and Support: A longitudinal analysis.比较个体安置与支持中就业的预测因素:一项纵向分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jun;264:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.050. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
What influences a sustainable implementation of evidence-based interventions in community mental health services? Development and pilot testing of a tool for mapping core components.哪些因素会影响社区心理健康服务中基于证据的干预措施的可持续实施?用于绘制核心要素的工具的开发和试点测试。
J Ment Health. 2018 Oct;27(5):395-401. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417544. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Economic, Labor, and Regulatory Moderators of the Effect of Individual Placement and Support Among People With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经济、劳动力和监管因素对个体安置和支持在严重精神疾病患者中的效果的调节作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jan 13;44(1):22-31. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx132.
7
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.针对重度精神疾病成年人获得和维持就业的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
8
The effectiveness of augmented versus standard individual placement and support programs in terms of employment: a systematic literature review.增强型与标准个体安置和支持计划在就业方面的效果:系统文献回顾。
J Ment Health. 2018 Apr;27(2):174-183. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1322180. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
Predictors of Acquisition of Competitive Employment for People Enrolled in Supported Employment Programs.参与支持性就业项目人员获得竞争性就业的预测因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Apr;205(4):275-282. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000612.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to Sustainment of an Evidence-Based Supported Employment Program.维持基于证据的支持性就业项目的障碍与促进因素
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 May;44(3):331-338. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0778-6.