• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字技术相关的健康政策和隐私挑战。

Health Policy and Privacy Challenges Associated With Digital Technology.

机构信息

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Perelman School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e208285. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8285.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8285
PMID:32644138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348687/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Digital technology is part of everyday life. Digital interactions generate large amounts of data that can reveal information about the health of individual consumers (the digital health footprint).

OBJECTIVE

Τo describe health privacy challenges associated with digital technology.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this qualitative study, In-depth, semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 key experts from diverse fields in the US between January 1 and July 31, 2018. Open-ended questions and hypothetical scenarios were used to identify sources of digital information that contribute to consumers' health-relevant digital footprints and challenges for health privacy. Participants also completed a survey instrument on which they rated the health relatedness of digital data sources.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Health policy challenges associated with digital technology based on qualitative responses to expert interviews.

RESULTS

Although experts' ratings of digital data sources suggested a possible distinction between health and nonhealth data, qualitative interviews uniformly indicated that all data can be health data, particularly when aggregated across sources and time. Five key characteristics of the digital health footprint were associated with health privacy policy challenges: invisibility (people are unaware of how their data are tracked), inaccuracy (data in the digital health footprint can be inaccurate), immortality (data have no expiration date and are aggregated over time), marketability (data have immense commercial value and are frequently bought and sold), and identifiability (individuals can be readily reidentified and anonymity is nearly impossible to achieve). There are virtually no regulatory structures in the US to protect health privacy in the context of the digital health footprint.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings suggest that a sector-specific approach to digital technology privacy in the US may be associated with inadequate health privacy protections.

摘要

重要性

数字技术是日常生活的一部分。数字交互产生大量数据,可以揭示有关个体消费者健康状况的信息(数字健康足迹)。

目的

描述与数字技术相关的健康隐私挑战。

设计、设置和参与者:这项定性研究于 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日期间,在美国不同领域的 26 名专家进行了深入、半结构化的定性访谈。采用开放式问题和假设情景,以确定有助于消费者健康相关数字足迹形成的数字信息来源以及健康隐私面临的挑战。参与者还完成了一份关于数字数据源与健康相关度的评估工具。

主要结果和措施

根据专家访谈的定性答复,与数字技术相关的健康政策挑战。

结果

尽管专家对数字数据源的评分表明健康数据和非健康数据之间可能存在差异,但定性访谈一致表明,所有数据都可能是健康数据,特别是当跨来源和时间进行汇总时。数字健康足迹的五个关键特征与健康隐私政策挑战相关:不可见性(人们不知道自己的数据是如何被跟踪的)、不准确性(数字健康足迹中的数据可能不准确)、永久性(数据没有截止日期,并且随着时间的推移而被汇总)、可销售性(数据具有巨大的商业价值,并且经常被买卖)以及可识别性(个人可以很容易地被重新识别,几乎不可能实现匿名)。在美国,几乎没有监管结构来保护数字健康足迹背景下的健康隐私。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,美国针对数字技术隐私的特定部门方法可能与不充分的健康隐私保护相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bc/7348687/c37cc03707d7/jamanetwopen-3-e208285-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bc/7348687/a2df03c58d55/jamanetwopen-3-e208285-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bc/7348687/c37cc03707d7/jamanetwopen-3-e208285-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bc/7348687/a2df03c58d55/jamanetwopen-3-e208285-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bc/7348687/c37cc03707d7/jamanetwopen-3-e208285-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Policy and Privacy Challenges Associated With Digital Technology.数字技术相关的健康政策和隐私挑战。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e208285. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8285.
2
Consumer Views on Health Applications of Consumer Digital Data and Health Privacy Among US Adults: Qualitative Interview Study.消费者对美国成年人消费者数字数据在健康应用和健康隐私方面的看法:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 9;23(6):e29395. doi: 10.2196/29395.
3
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.
4
Consumer Views on Privacy Protections and Sharing of Personal Digital Health Information.消费者对隐私保护和个人数字健康信息共享的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1305.
5
An Assessment of Perspectives and Concerns Among Research Participants of Childbearing Age Regarding the Health-Relatedness of Data, Online Data Privacy, and Donating Data to Researchers: Survey Study.一项针对育龄研究参与者的观点和关注点的评估,这些参与者关注数据与健康的相关性、在线数据隐私以及向研究人员捐赠数据的问题:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 10;25:e41937. doi: 10.2196/41937.
6
The Human Rights Challenges of Digital COVID-19 Surveillance.新冠疫情数字化监测中的人权挑战
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):79-84.
7
Consumer Views on Using Digital Data for COVID-19 Control in the United States.消费者对美国使用数字数据进行新冠疫情控制的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10918.
8
Consumer Willingness to Share Personal Digital Information for Health-Related Uses.消费者愿意分享个人数字信息用于健康相关用途。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44787.
9
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
10
Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records.电子健康记录中的隐私、保密、安全和患者安全问题。
Int Nurs Rev. 2020 Jun;67(2):218-230. doi: 10.1111/inr.12585. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ontologies as the semantic bridge between artificial intelligence and healthcare.本体作为人工智能与医疗保健之间的语义桥梁。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 29;7:1668385. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1668385. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital health literacy is linked to attitudes regarding the ethical aspects of digital health among patients with dermatologic comorbidities.数字健康素养与患有皮肤病合并症患者对数字健康伦理方面的态度相关。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330916. eCollection 2025.
3
Ownership and Perceived Usefulness of Digital Health Tools (DHT) for Health Promotion Among Individuals with Rheumatologic Disease in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Health Information and Employment Discrimination under the ADA and GINA.《美国残疾人法案》和《基因信息非歧视法案》下的预测性健康信息与就业歧视
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Sep;48(3):595-602. doi: 10.1177/1073110520958887.
2
The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations.遗传隐私法:应用、影响及局限性
J Law Biosci. 2019 May 14;6(1):1-36. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz007. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
美国风湿病患者中用于健康促进的数字健康工具(DHT)的所有权及感知有用性
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025 Jul 3;15(4):1-7. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1506. eCollection 2025.
4
Artificial intelligence machine learning-driven outpatient appointment management: A qualitative study on acceptability.人工智能机器学习驱动的门诊预约管理:关于可接受性的定性研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251321016. doi: 10.1177/20552076251321016. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Expanding Application of Optical Coherence Tomography Beyond the Clinic: A Narrative Review.光学相干断层扫描在临床之外的扩展应用:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;15(9):1140. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091140.
6
Social Determinants of Health in Digital Health Policies: an International Environmental Scan.数字健康政策中的健康社会决定因素:一项国际环境扫描
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):283-291. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800759. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
7
The Application of Preventive Medicine in the Future Digital Health Era.预防医学在未来数字健康时代的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 27;27:e59165. doi: 10.2196/59165.
8
Current Implementation of Digital Health in Chronic Disease Management: Scoping Review.慢性病管理中数字健康的当前实施情况:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 12;26:e53576. doi: 10.2196/53576.
9
Service quality evaluation of county-level public hospitals in Chongqing under smart healthcare.智慧医疗背景下重庆市县级公立医院服务质量评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11976-z.
10
Gaps in the Global Regulatory Frameworks for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Healthcare Services Sector and Key Recommendations.医疗服务领域使用人工智能(AI)的全球监管框架中的差距及关键建议。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;12(17):1730. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171730.
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
4
Assessing risk, automating racism.评估风险,使种族主义自动化。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):421-422. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3873.
5
Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models.利用生成模型估计不完全数据集重识别的成功率。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3.
6
Evaluating the predictability of medical conditions from social media posts.从社交媒体帖子评估医疗状况的可预测性。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 17;14(6):e0215476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215476. eCollection 2019.
7
Feasibility of Reidentifying Individuals in Large National Physical Activity Data Sets From Which Protected Health Information Has Been Removed With Use of Machine Learning.利用机器学习对已去除保护健康信息的大型国家体力活动数据集进行重新识别个体的可行性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186040. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6040.
8
Facebook language predicts depression in medical records.脸书的语言可预测病历中的抑郁症状。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):11203-11208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802331115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
HIPAA and Protecting Health Information in the 21st Century.《健康保险流通与责任法案》及21世纪健康信息保护
JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):231-232. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5630.
10
The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers.消费级健康可穿戴设备的崛起:前景与障碍
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 2;13(2):e1001953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953. eCollection 2016 Feb.