• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含糖饮料税与饮料价格、进口和制造业变化:中等收入国家的中断时间序列分析。

Sweetened beverage taxes and changes in beverage price, imports and manufacturing: interrupted time series analysis in a middle-income country.

机构信息

University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.

University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jul 9;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00980-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-020-00980-1
PMID:32646500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7350205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pacific Island nation of Tonga (a middle-income country) introduced a sweetened beverage tax of T$0.50/L in 2013, with this increasing further in 2016 (to T$1.00/L), and in 2017 (T$1.50/L; US$0.02/oz). Given the potential importance of such types of fiscal intervention for preventing chronic disease, we aimed to evaluate the impact of these tax changes in Tonga.

METHODS

Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine monthly import volumes and quarterly price and manufacturing 1 year after each tax change, compared with a counterfactual based on existing trends. Autocorrelation was adjusted for when present, and adjustments were made for changes in GDP per capita, visitor numbers, season and T$/US$ exchange rate.

RESULTS

In the year after the 2013, 2016 and 2017 tax increases, the price of an indicator soft drink increased by 16.8% (95%CI: 6.3 to 29.6), 3.7% (- 0.6 to 8.3) and 17.6% (6.0 to 32.0) respectively. Imports of sweetened beverages decreased with changes of - 10.4% (- 23.6 to 9.0), - 30.3% (- 38.8 to - 20.5) and - 62.5% (- 73.1 to - 43.4) respectively. Juice imports changed by - 54.2% (- 93.2 to - 1.1), and sachet drinks by - 15.5% (- 67.8 to 88.3) after the 2017 tax increase. Tonga water bottling (T$) increased in value by 143% (69 to 334) after the 2016 tax increase and soft drink manufacturing increased by 20% (2 to 46, albeit 5% market share).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with international evaluations of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes, the taxes in Tonga were associated with increased prices, decreased taxed beverages imports, and increased locally bottled water.

摘要

背景

汤加(一个中等收入国家)于 2013 年引入了每升 0.50 汤加元(T$)的含糖饮料税,2016 年进一步提高到每升 1.00 汤加元(T$)(0.02 美元/盎司),2017 年提高到每升 1.50 汤加元(T$)(0.02 美元/盎司)。鉴于此类财政干预措施对预防慢性病的重要性,我们旨在评估汤加税收变化的影响。

方法

使用中断时间序列分析,在每次税收变化后 1 年,比较月度进口量和季度价格以及制造业数据,以现有趋势为对照。存在自相关时进行了调整,并对人均 GDP、游客人数、季节和汤加元/美元汇率变化进行了调整。

结果

在 2013 年、2016 年和 2017 年税收增加后的一年中,指示性软饮料价格分别上涨 16.8%(95%CI:6.3 至 29.6)、3.7%(-0.6 至 8.3)和 17.6%(6.0 至 32.0)。含糖饮料进口分别减少 10.4%(-23.6 至 9.0)、30.3%(-38.8 至-20.5)和-62.5%(-73.1 至-43.4)。果汁进口在 2017 年税收增加后下降了 54.2%(-93.2 至-1.1),袋装饮料下降了 15.5%(-67.8 至 88.3)。2016 年税收增加后,汤加瓶装水(T$)的价值增加了 143%(69 至 334),软饮料制造业增加了 20%(2 至 46,尽管市场份额为 5%)。

结论

与国际上对含糖饮料税的评估一致,汤加的税收与价格上涨、受税饮料进口减少和本地瓶装水增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/089b9e403164/12966_2020_980_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/b6f08c0cbd82/12966_2020_980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/f7484736f394/12966_2020_980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/80a767d9684d/12966_2020_980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/0b17229f6425/12966_2020_980_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/089b9e403164/12966_2020_980_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/b6f08c0cbd82/12966_2020_980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/f7484736f394/12966_2020_980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/80a767d9684d/12966_2020_980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/0b17229f6425/12966_2020_980_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8adc/7350205/089b9e403164/12966_2020_980_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sweetened beverage taxes and changes in beverage price, imports and manufacturing: interrupted time series analysis in a middle-income country.含糖饮料税与饮料价格、进口和制造业变化:中等收入国家的中断时间序列分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jul 9;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00980-1.
2
Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on price, import and sale volumes in an island: interrupted time series analysis.含糖饮料税对岛屿上价格、进口和销售量的影响:中断时间序列分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1828-1835. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000185. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.甜味饮料税与费城独立商店饮料和高糖食品购买量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527.
4
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
5
Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.伊利诺伊州库克县实施和废除含糖饮料税后饮料价格和销售量变化的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031083. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31083.
6
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
Longer-term impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on fast-food beverage prices: evidence from Oakland, California, 2-year post-tax.含糖饮料税对快餐饮料价格的长期影响:来自加利福尼亚州奥克兰市的 2 年税收后证据。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3571-3575. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005212. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
8
Equity of expenditure changes associated with a sweetened-beverage tax in Tonga: repeated cross-sectional household surveys.汤加含糖饮料税相关支出变化的公平性:重复横断面家庭调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10139-z.
9
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.伊利诺伊州库克县含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Impact of a sweetened beverage tax on beverage prices in Seattle, WA.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Dec;39:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100917. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Sugar, power and policy: The political economy of a health and economic 'win-win' in Fiji's sugar-sweetened beverage tax.糖、权力与政策:斐济含糖饮料税中健康与经济“双赢”的政治经济学
Global Health. 2025 Aug 4;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01139-y.
2
Factors influencing parents' food-purchasing decisions in the Pacific: a qualitative study in Tonga.影响太平洋地区父母食品购买决策的因素:汤加的一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):2096. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23210-4.
3
Food environments in the Pacific region and efforts to improve them: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing better sugary drink taxes.设计更优的含糖饮料税。
Science. 2019 Sep 6;365(6457):989-990. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5199.
2
Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis.含糖饮料税对购买和饮食摄入的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Sep;20(9):1187-1204. doi: 10.1111/obr.12868. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
in Tonga: Exploring the Nature and Context of the Food Tongan Children Eat in Ha'apai Using Wearable Cameras.在汤加:使用可穿戴相机探索哈派儿童所食用食物的本质和背景。
太平洋地区的食物环境及其改善措施:一项范围综述
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Nov 26;28(1):e5. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002350.
4
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
5
Exploring the sugar-sweetened beverage tax (SSBT) pass-through rate in the Irish hospitality sector.探究爱尔兰酒店业含糖饮料税(SSBT)的转嫁率。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):2360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19891-y.
6
A scoping review of policies related to reducing energy drink consumption in children.一项针对减少儿童能量饮料消费相关政策的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):2308. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19724-y.
7
Food tax policies in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: systematic policy review.太平洋岛国和地区的食物税收政策:系统政策审查。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec 21;27(1):e20. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002914.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the introduction of import duties designed to prevent noncommunicable disease in Tonga: a case study.汤加引入旨在预防非传染性疾病的进口关税的障碍和促进因素:案例研究。
Global Health. 2021 Nov 27;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00788-z.
9
Did imports of sweetened beverages to Pacific Island countries increase between 2000 and 2015?2000年至2015年间,太平洋岛国的甜味饮料进口量增加了吗?
BMC Nutr. 2021 May 20;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40795-021-00416-4.
10
Equity of expenditure changes associated with a sweetened-beverage tax in Tonga: repeated cross-sectional household surveys.汤加含糖饮料税相关支出变化的公平性:重复横断面家庭调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10139-z.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 14;16(10):1681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101681.
4
Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study.评估巴巴多斯含糖饮料税对饮料销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 30;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7.
5
Does the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax have a signaling effect? ENSANUT 2016.墨西哥含糖饮料税是否具有信号效应?ENSANUT 2016。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0199337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199337. eCollection 2018.
6
Cross-sectional surveys of the amount of sugar, energy and caffeine in sugar-sweetened drinks marketed and consumed as energy drinks in the UK between 2015 and 2017: monitoring reformulation progress.2015年至2017年期间英国作为能量饮料销售和消费的含糖饮料中糖、能量和咖啡因含量的横断面调查:监测配方改革进展情况。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018136. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018136.
7
After Mexico Implemented a Tax, Purchases of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Decreased and Water Increased: Difference by Place of Residence, Household Composition, and Income Level.墨西哥实施一项税收政策后,含糖饮料的购买量下降,而水的购买量增加:按居住地点、家庭构成和收入水平划分的差异
J Nutr. 2017 Aug;147(8):1552-1557. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.251892. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
8
In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.在墨西哥,实施含糖饮料税后两年消费者持续反应的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):564-571. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
10
Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study.墨西哥对含糖甜味饮料征收消费税情况下商店饮料购买情况的观察性研究。
BMJ. 2016 Jan 6;352:h6704. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6704.