• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证癌症疼痛管理中障碍问卷 II 的日文版:一项横断面研究。

Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Analysis Section, Center for Cancer Registries, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 9;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0
PMID:32646513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7350563/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II) was developed to assess barriers to effective pain management. In this study, we aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese version of the BQ-II (JBQ-II).

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted an ambulatory infusion center for cancer in a general hospital in Tokyo, Japan. Participants were 120 Japanese patients with cancer and 21 Japanese health professionals with experience in pain management. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to calculate reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed with Spearman's intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct, criterion-related, and discriminant validity were assessed using information about pain management, daily life, mental health, and subjective health.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 for the JBQ-II, and all ICCs exceeded 0.70 (P < 0.01). Factor analysis showed the JBQ-II had a virtually identical structure to the BQ-II, and path analysis supported the JBQ-II constructs. The JBQ-II was weakly correlated with poor mental state (r = 0.36, P < 0.01). Patients' JBQ-II scores were significantly higher than health professionals' scores.

CONCLUSION

The JBQ-II is a valid and reliable measure of patient-related barriers to pain management among Japanese adult patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

障碍问卷 II(BQ-II)是为评估有效疼痛管理障碍而开发的。本研究旨在评估新开发的日本版 BQ-II(JBQ-II)的可靠性和有效性。

方法

本研究采用横断面设计。研究在日本东京的一家综合医院的门诊输液中心进行。参与者包括 120 名日本癌症患者和 21 名具有疼痛管理经验的日本卫生专业人员。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估可靠性。使用 Spearman 组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度。使用有关疼痛管理、日常生活、心理健康和主观健康的信息评估结构、效标关联和判别有效性。

结果

JBQ-II 的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.90,所有 ICC 均超过 0.70(P<0.01)。因子分析显示,JBQ-II 与 BQ-II 的结构几乎相同,路径分析支持 JBQ-II 的结构。JBQ-II 与较差的精神状态呈弱相关(r=0.36,P<0.01)。患者的 JBQ-II 评分明显高于卫生专业人员的评分。

结论

JBQ-II 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估日本成年癌症患者疼痛管理的患者相关障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/757f/7350563/b648789a5d03/12904_2020_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/757f/7350563/b648789a5d03/12904_2020_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/757f/7350563/b648789a5d03/12904_2020_606_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study.验证癌症疼痛管理中障碍问卷 II 的日文版:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 9;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0.
2
Analysis of Barriers to Medical Opioid Pain Medication Using the Japanese Version of the Barriers Questionnaire II (JBQ-II): Pharmacists and Nurses Perspective in Japan.使用日语版《障碍问卷II》(JBQ-II)分析医用阿片类镇痛药的障碍:日本药剂师和护士的观点
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Mar;42(3):287-295. doi: 10.1177/10499091241252841. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
Iranian Brief Pain Inventory: Validation and Application in Elderly People With Cancer Pain.伊朗简短疼痛量表:在老年癌症疼痛患者中的验证和应用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):563-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
4
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》(RAQ)日语版的心理测量学特性:一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale.中文版护士癌症疼痛管理能力量表的信效度
Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Oct;25(5):e375-e380. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Knowledge and Beliefs About Pain in Elderly Patients With Dementia Questionnaire.中文版老年痴呆症患者疼痛知识信念问卷的心理计量学评估。
J Nurs Res. 2020 Jun;28(3):e87. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000361.
7
Developing a Short Form of the German Barriers Questionnaire II: A Validation Study in Four Steps.开发德国障碍问卷 II 短式版本:四步验证研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):458-467. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Injustice Experience Questionnaire, Japanese Version: Cross-Cultural Factor-Structure Comparison and Demographics Associated with Perceived Injustice.不公正经历问卷,日文版:跨文化因素结构比较及与感知不公正相关的人口统计学特征
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160567. eCollection 2016.
9
Cancer patients' barriers to pain management and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Barriers Questionnaire II.癌症患者疼痛管理的障碍以及挪威版《障碍问卷II》的心理测量特性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Sep;23(3):518-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00639.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
10
Validation of the Japanese version of the Fatigue Barriers Scale (JFBS).日本版疲劳障碍量表(JFBS)的验证
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2013 Oct;19(10):503-9. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.10.503.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Barriers to the Use of Opioid Analgesics for Treating Pain in Patients With Advanced Recurrent Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study.晚期复发性癌症患者使用阿片类镇痛药治疗疼痛的心理障碍:一项多中心队列研究。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Jan 19;5(1):43-52. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0068. eCollection 2024.
2
Development of the opioid self-management scale for advanced Cancer patients with pain and examination of its validity and reliability.阿片类药物自我管理量表的制定用于疼痛的晚期癌症患者,并对其有效性和可靠性进行了检验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 6;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00987-4.
3
Attitudes, Knowledge, and Perceived Barriers Towards Cancer Pain Management Among Healthcare Professionals in Libya: a National Multicenter Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Oncology Patients' and Their Family Caregivers' Attitudes and Concerns Toward Pain and Pain Management.肿瘤患者及其家庭照顾者对疼痛及疼痛管理的态度与担忧比较
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(4):328-34. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000319.
2
Patient- and family caregiver-related barriers to effective cancer pain control.患者及家庭护理者在有效控制癌症疼痛方面存在的障碍。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Jun;16(3):400-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.09.007.
3
Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer.
利比亚医护人员对癌症疼痛管理的态度、知识和感知障碍:一项全国多中心调查。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):789-797. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02185-5. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Psychological barriers to the use of opioid analgesics for treating pain in patients with advanced recurrent cancer (BAROC): protocol for a multicentre cohort study.心理障碍对晚期复发性癌症患者使用阿片类镇痛药治疗疼痛的影响(BAROC):一项多中心队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 31;12(3):e054914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054914.
5
Gender Difference in Pain Management Among Adult Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Assessment.沙特阿拉伯成年癌症患者疼痛管理中的性别差异:一项横断面评估。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:628223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628223. eCollection 2021.
癌症疼痛管理质量:对癌症患者治疗不足的系统评价更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 20;32(36):4149-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0383. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
4
Improvement of pain-related self-management for cancer patients through a modular transitional nursing intervention: a cluster-randomized multicenter trial.通过模块化过渡护理干预改善癌症患者疼痛相关自我管理:一项整群随机多中心试验
Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
5
Predictors of high score patient-reported barriers to controlling cancer pain: a preliminary report.预测控制癌症疼痛患者报告障碍的高分因素:初步报告。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Apr;21(4):1175-83. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1646-x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer.癌症患者心理社会干预减轻疼痛的荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):539-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.0437. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
7
Knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about opioids, palliative care, and homecare of advanced cancer patients: a nationwide survey in Japan.日本全国范围内的调查:晚期癌症患者对阿片类药物、姑息治疗和家庭护理的知识、信念和担忧。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 May;20(5):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1161-5. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
8
Analysis of patient-related barriers in cancer pain management in Turkish patients.土耳其患者癌症疼痛管理中与患者相关的障碍分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Nov;38(5):727-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
9
The Danish Barriers Questionnaire-II: preliminary validation in cancer pain patients.丹麦障碍问卷-II:在癌症疼痛患者中的初步验证
Pain Pract. 2009 Jul-Aug;9(4):266-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00296.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
10
Cancer patients' barriers to pain management and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Barriers Questionnaire II.癌症患者疼痛管理的障碍以及挪威版《障碍问卷II》的心理测量特性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Sep;23(3):518-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00639.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.