Alnimr Amani M, Alamri Aisha M
Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, KSA.
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 12;15(3):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.04.004. eCollection 2020 Jun.
We conducted this study to test the susceptibility of to the routinely used drugs and to the two recently available antimicrobial agents, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam.
We isolated the non-replicate strains of from inpatients between December 2018 and April 2019. The VITEK® MS system was used for phenotypic identification and VITEK 2 for initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We supplemented these tests with determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of four antimicrobials; imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were followed.
A total of 67 strains of including 38 multidrug-resistant strains, were obtained from various specimens. Susceptibility to various tested aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones was maintained in 49.3-56.7% and 40.0-43.3% of the total isolates. Amongst β-lactams, the strains were susceptible to the following agents in an ascending order: ceftazidime (32.8%), cefepime (37.3%), imipenem (36.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (39.0%), meropenem (44.8%), ceftazidime-avibactam (61.2%) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (62.7%). The susceptibility rates of the multidrug-resistant strains to both ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were less than 35%. High levels of resistance to the new agents (MIC > 256 ug/ml) were detected in 21 and 22 isolates.
Our study shows limitation in the empirical use of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam as therapeutics in serious infections. Moreover, our data highlights the need for prompt antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide their clinical usage.
我们开展本研究以检测[具体菌种未给出]对常用药物以及两种近期可用的抗菌药物(头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦)的敏感性。
我们从2018年12月至2019年4月期间的住院患者中分离出[具体菌种未给出]的非复制菌株。使用VITEK® MS系统进行表型鉴定,使用VITEK 2进行初始抗菌药物敏感性测试。我们通过测定四种抗菌药物(亚胺培南、美罗培南、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)来补充这些测试。遵循临床和实验室标准协会的标准。
从各种标本中总共获得了67株[具体菌种未给出],其中包括38株多重耐药菌株。在分离出的所有菌株中,对各种测试的氨基糖苷类和氟喹诺酮类药物的敏感性分别保持在49.3% - 56.7%和40.0% - 43.3%。在β-内酰胺类药物中,菌株对以下药物的敏感性呈升序排列:头孢他啶(32.8%)、头孢吡肟(37.3%)、亚胺培南(36.0%)、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(39.0%)、美罗培南(44.8%)、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(61.2%)和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦(62.7%)。多重耐药菌株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦的敏感性均低于35%。在21株和22株分离菌株中检测到对新型药物的高水平耐药(MIC > 256 μg/ml)。
我们的研究表明,在严重感染中经验性使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦作为治疗药物存在局限性。此外,我们的数据强调了进行快速抗菌药物敏感性测试以指导其临床使用的必要性。