Zeeck Almut, Schlegel Sabine, Jagau Friederike, Lahmann Claas, Hartmann Armin
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine und Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 8, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
J Eat Disord. 2020 Jul 7;8:31. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00309-0. eCollection 2020.
Unhealthy attitudes towards sport and problematic exercise behavior in eating disorders (ED) are common and associated with poorer treatment outcome and higher relapse rates. There is a need to develop and empirically test interventions that could complement standard treatment. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of the Freiburg sport therapy program for eating disorders (FSTP).
Outpatients with ED were randomized either to a 3 month sport therapy program (sport therapy group: STG) or a waiting list control group (CG). Patients were assessed when starting the program and at the end of the intervention. The intervention group (STG) was followed up after 6 month. Main outcome criterion was a reduction in unhealthy exercise (Commitment to Exercise Scale, CES). Secondary outcomes encompassed eating pathology (Eating Disorder Examination, EDE), different dimensions of unhealthy exercise (Compulsive Exercise Test, CET subscales) and exercise quantity (accelerometer).
Recruitment was challenging. Fifteen patients were randomized to the STG and 11 were randomized to the CG condition. There was no statistically significant difference between groups according to the main outcome criterion. However, the STG showed a significantly stronger reduction in avoidance and rule driven behavior (CET subscale) when compared to the CG. Improvements (STG) were maintained at follow up.
There was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of unhealthy attitudes towards sport and problematic exercise behavior between the intervention and the group, as measured with the Commitment to Exercise Scale. Further findings may point to the effectiveness of the program, but have to be interpreted with caution and verified in further studies. A major limitation is the small sample size.
Study register: ISRCTN 14776348 (registered 26 January, 2015.
饮食失调(ED)患者对运动持不健康态度以及存在问题性运动行为很常见,且与较差的治疗效果和较高的复发率相关。有必要开发并通过实证检验能够补充标准治疗的干预措施。本研究旨在评估弗赖堡饮食失调运动治疗项目(FSTP)的疗效。
将患有饮食失调的门诊患者随机分为为期3个月的运动治疗项目组(运动治疗组:STG)或等待名单对照组(CG)。在项目开始时和干预结束时对患者进行评估。对干预组(STG)在6个月后进行随访。主要结局标准是不健康运动的减少(运动投入量表,CES)。次要结局包括饮食病理学(饮食失调检查,EDE)、不健康运动的不同维度(强迫性运动测试,CET子量表)和运动量(加速度计)。
招募具有挑战性。15名患者被随机分配到STG组,11名患者被随机分配到CG组。根据主要结局标准,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,与CG组相比,STG组在回避和规则驱动行为(CET子量表)方面的减少更为显著。(STG组的)改善在随访时得以维持。
用运动投入量表衡量,干预组和对照组在减少对运动的不健康态度和问题性运动行为方面没有统计学上的显著差异。进一步的研究结果可能表明该项目的有效性,但必须谨慎解释并在进一步研究中加以验证。一个主要限制是样本量小。
研究注册号:ISRCTN 14776348(2015年1月26日注册)