Boissier Florence, Bagate François, Mekontso Dessap Armand
CHU de Poitiers, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France.
INSERM CIC 1402 (ALIVE group), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):791. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-23.
Circulatory shock is a life-threatening condition responsible for inadequate tissue perfusion. The objectives of hemodynamic monitoring in this setting are multiple: identifying the mechanisms of shock (hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, obstructive); choosing the adequate therapeutic intervention, and evaluating the patient's response. Echocardiography is proposed as a first line tool for this assessment in the intensive care unit. As compared to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE), trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers a better echogenicity and is the best way to evaluate deep anatomic structures. The therapeutic implication of TEE leads to frequent changes in clinical management. It also allows depicting sources of inaccuracy of thermodilution-based hemodynamic monitoring. It is a semi invasive tool with a low rate of complications. The first step in the hemodynamic evaluation of shock is to characterize the mechanisms of circulatory failure among hypovolemia, vasoplegia, cardiac dysfunction, and obstruction. Echocardiographic evaluation includes evaluation of LV systolic and diastolic function, as well as RV function, pericardium, measure of stroke volume and cardiac output, and evaluation of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. TEE can be used as a semi-continuous monitoring tool and can be repeated before and after therapeutic interventions (vasopressors, inotropes, fluid therapy, specific treatment such as pericardial effusion evacuation) to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of therapeutic interventions. In conclusion, TEE plays an important role in the management of circulatory failure when TTE is not enough to answer to the questions, although it is not a continuous tool of monitoring. TEE results must be integrated in a global evaluation, the first step being clinical examination. Whether TEE-directed therapy and close hemodynamic monitoring of shock has an impact on outcome remains debated.
循环性休克是一种危及生命的状况,可导致组织灌注不足。在此情况下进行血流动力学监测有多个目的:识别休克机制(低血容量性、分布性、心源性、梗阻性);选择适当的治疗干预措施,并评估患者的反应。在重症监护病房中,超声心动图被推荐作为这种评估的一线工具。与经胸超声心动图(TTE)相比,经食管超声心动图(TEE)具有更好的回声性,是评估深部解剖结构的最佳方法。TEE的治疗意义导致临床管理频繁改变。它还能显示基于热稀释法的血流动力学监测的不准确来源。它是一种半侵入性工具,并发症发生率低。休克血流动力学评估的第一步是确定低血容量、血管麻痹、心脏功能障碍和梗阻等循环衰竭机制。超声心动图评估包括左心室收缩和舒张功能评估、右心室功能评估、心包评估、每搏量和心输出量测量,以及低血容量和液体反应性评估。TEE可用作半连续监测工具,可在治疗干预(血管升压药、正性肌力药、液体治疗、心包积液引流等特异性治疗)前后重复使用,以评估治疗干预的疗效和耐受性。总之,当TTE不足以回答问题时,TEE在循环衰竭的管理中发挥着重要作用,尽管它不是一种连续监测工具。TEE结果必须纳入全面评估,第一步是临床检查。TEE指导的治疗和对休克的密切血流动力学监测是否会影响预后仍存在争议。