Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Lessingstr. 2, D-80336, München, Germany.
Int J Med Microbiol. 2020 Jul;310(5):151434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2020.151434. Epub 2020 May 27.
The year 2019 marked the 140th anniversary of the inauguration of the first Institute of Hygiene, which was established for Max von Pettenkofer at the university of Munich. After Pettenkofer, his successors tried to advance the science of hygiene each in their own specific way, highlighting different aspects and trying to relate them to Pettenkofer's legacy: Max von Gruber promoted an understanding of hygiene which was more and more tied to constitutional and racial factors, Karl Kisskalt tried to revise a perceived bacteriological paradigm, and Hermann Eyer focused on preventive public health measures. All of those influences had a more or less explicit and distinct connection to the general development of German medicine in the first half of the 20th century and its culmination in National Socialist crimes. The history of Munich's Institute of Hygiene after Pettenkofer illustrates the differing scientific and ideological paths this development pursued by the examples of its three long-term protagonists and their relationship to National Socialism.
2019 年标志着第一所卫生学研究所成立 140 周年,该研究所是为慕尼黑大学的 Max von Pettenkofer 设立的。Pettenkofer 之后,他的继任者们各自以特定的方式试图推进卫生学科学,强调不同的方面,并试图将其与 Pettenkofer 的遗产联系起来:Max von Gruber 推动了一种越来越与体质和种族因素相关的卫生学理解,Karl Kisskalt 试图修正一种被认为是细菌学的范式,而 Hermann Eyer 则专注于预防性公共卫生措施。所有这些影响或多或少都与 20 世纪上半叶德国医学的总体发展及其在纳粹罪行中的顶峰有着明确而明显的联系。Pettenkofer 之后慕尼黑卫生学研究所的历史通过其三位长期主角的例子说明了这一发展所遵循的不同科学和意识形态道路,以及他们与纳粹主义的关系。