• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测淋巴结转移性阴茎癌复发的风险计算器。

A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer.

机构信息

Urological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 Nov;126(5):577-585. doi: 10.1111/bju.15177. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1111/bju.15177
PMID:32662205
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk-calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m-R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Positive surgical margins, pN , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2-year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19-37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m-R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts (P > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种预测阴茎鳞状细胞癌(pSCC)伴腹股沟淋巴结转移(ILNM)患者任何癌症复发风险的计算器,因为目前尚无针对 pSCC 伴 ILNM 患者的验证预后工具。

患者与方法

该研究的开发队列纳入了来自 7 个转诊中心的 234 名患者。外部验证队列纳入了来自另外 2 个转诊中心的 273 名患者。Cox 回归分析确定了任何复发的预测因素,据此开发了风险计算器。根据个体 24 个月时任何复发的风险(24m-R),风险计算器将开发队列和验证队列分为不同的组。在开发和验证队列中,根据得出的三分位数,测试辅助治疗对总生存率(OS)的影响。

结果

切缘阳性、pN 和 ILNM 比值与较高的复发率相关。高(>37%)和中危(19-37%)24m-R 复发风险的患者 2 年 OS 率低于低危(<19%)患者,无论是在开发队列(43%和 58% vs 83%,P<0.001)还是验证队列(44%和 50% vs 85%,P<0.001)。在未接受辅助治疗的患者亚组中,结果得到了证实(P<0.001),但在开发和验证队列中接受辅助治疗的患者中,结果则相反(P>0.1)。

结论

在腹股沟淋巴结转移的阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者中,辅助治疗计划至关重要,但目前只有有限的证据支持。该工具能够成功地根据患者的个体风险对患者进行分层,有可能更好地为辅助治疗提供指导。

相似文献

1
A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer.预测淋巴结转移性阴茎癌复发的风险计算器。
BJU Int. 2020 Nov;126(5):577-585. doi: 10.1111/bju.15177. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Patterns of Recurrence following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后阴茎癌复发模式:优化监测策略。
J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):960-969. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001790. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma.阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结清扫术后区域复发的相关因素。
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):591-597. doi: 10.1111/bju.13686. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Histological subtype is a significant predictor for inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.组织学亚型是阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者腹股沟淋巴结转移的重要预测指标。
Asian J Androl. 2018 May-Jun;20(3):265-269. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_60_17.
5
Deep Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases Can Predict Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases and Prognosis in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.腹股沟深淋巴结转移可预测阴茎鳞状细胞癌的盆腔淋巴结转移及预后。
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 15;11:715799. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.715799. eCollection 2021.
6
Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.阴茎癌手术治疗中的淋巴结清扫术。
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1075-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
7
Risks and Benefits of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Penile Cancer Guidelines Panel.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后辅助放疗在淋巴结阳性阴茎癌中的风险和获益:欧洲泌尿外科学会阴茎癌指南专家组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Pattern of invasion is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer submitted to lymph node dissection and pathological absence of lymph node metastasis.浸润模式是接受淋巴结清扫且病理检查无淋巴结转移的阴茎癌患者最重要的预后因素。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):584-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13071. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
9
Management of the penile squamous cell carcinoma patient after node positive radical inguinal lymph node dissection: current evidence and future prospects.阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者在腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后出现淋巴结阳性的处理:当前证据和未来前景。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):223-228. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000714.
10
Prognostic factors in patients with penile carcinoma and inguinal lymph node metastasis.阴茎癌伴腹股沟淋巴结转移患者的预后因素
Int J Urol. 2015 Jul;22(7):669-73. doi: 10.1111/iju.12759. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis of the penile cancer with distant metastasis.阴茎癌远处转移的危险因素及远处转移阴茎癌的预后
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):1256-1267. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-92. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
"Light green up": Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-guided Robotic Bilateral Inguinal Lymphadenectomy by the Hypogastric Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.“浅绿向上”:通过下腹皮下入路的吲哚菁绿荧光成像引导机器人双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Sep 12;45:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.020. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
A global approach to improving penile cancer care.
全球方法改善阴茎癌护理。
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Apr;19(4):231-239. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00557-y. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Lymph Node Dissections for T3T4 Stage Penile Cancer Patients Without Preoperatively Detectable Lymph Node Metastasis Bring More Survival Benefits: A Propensity Matching Analysis.对术前未检测到淋巴结转移的 T3T4 期阴茎癌患者进行淋巴结清扫带来更多生存益处:一项倾向匹配分析。
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 24;11:712553. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.712553. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.检查的淋巴结数量和淋巴结密度对阴茎癌总生存率的影响
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 7;11:706531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.706531. eCollection 2021.
6
Correlation Between the Evolution of Somatic Alterations During Lymphatic Metastasis and Clinical Outcome in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴转移过程中体细胞改变的演变与临床结局的相关性
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 2;11:641869. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641869. eCollection 2021.
7
Use of flaps in inguinal lymphadenectomy in metastatic penile cancer.在转移性阴茎癌的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术中使用皮瓣。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.99.14.