• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种七年级吸烟预防策略的四年及五年随访结果。

Four- and five-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies.

作者信息

Murray D M, Davis-Hearn M, Goldman A I, Pirie P, Luepker R V

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 1988 Aug;11(4):395-405. doi: 10.1007/BF00844938.

DOI:10.1007/BF00844938
PMID:3266255
Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that a prevention program that addresses the social influences that encourage smoking can be effective in deterring cigarette use by adolescents. This study presents 4- and 5-year follow-up results from two studies which evaluated three variations of this social influences model and compared them to a health consequences program and an existing-curriculum condition. The results suggest that a seventh-grade program, built around the social influences model and taught jointly by same-age peer leaders and local classroom teachers, may reduce 4-year weekly- and daily-smoking cumulative incidence rates, providing the first evidence for any long-term effects for the social influences model. However, the results also suggest that any long-term effects from such interventions are probably limited and may depend heavily on the manner in which the social influences model is translated during the intervention. Additional follow-up studies are needed to clarify the long-term effects of these intervention programs.

摘要

最近的研究表明,一项针对鼓励吸烟的社会影响因素的预防计划,在阻止青少年吸烟方面可能会有效。本研究展示了两项研究的4年和5年随访结果,这两项研究评估了该社会影响模型的三种变体,并将它们与一个健康后果计划和一个现有课程情况进行了比较。结果表明,一个围绕社会影响模型构建、由同龄同伴领袖和当地课堂教师共同授课的七年级计划,可能会降低4年的每周和每日吸烟累积发病率,这为社会影响模型的任何长期效果提供了首个证据。然而,结果也表明,此类干预措施的任何长期效果可能有限,并且可能在很大程度上取决于在干预过程中社会影响模型的转化方式。需要进一步的随访研究来阐明这些干预计划的长期效果。

相似文献

1
Four- and five-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies.四种七年级吸烟预防策略的四年及五年随访结果。
J Behav Med. 1988 Aug;11(4):395-405. doi: 10.1007/BF00844938.
2
The prevention of cigarette smoking in children: two- and three-year follow-up comparisons of four prevention strategies.
J Behav Med. 1987 Dec;10(6):595-611. doi: 10.1007/BF00846657.
3
Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies.四项七年级吸烟预防策略的五年和六年随访结果。
J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):207-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00846551.
4
Prevention of cigarette smoking: three-year follow-up of an education program for youth.预防吸烟:一项针对青少年的教育项目的三年随访
J Behav Med. 1983 Mar;6(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00845276.
5
The Minnesota smoking prevention program: a seventh-grade health curriculum supplement.明尼苏达吸烟预防项目:七年级健康课程补充材料
J Sch Health. 1981 Nov;51(9):611-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1981.tb02246.x.
6
Fifteen-year follow-up of smoking prevention effects in the North Karelia youth project.北卡累利阿青年项目中吸烟预防效果的15年随访
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):81-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.81.
7
Peer education in friendship cliques: prevention of adolescent smoking.友谊小团体中的同伴教育:预防青少年吸烟
Health Educ Res. 1991 Mar;6(1):101-8. doi: 10.1093/her/6.1.101.
8
Are social-psychological smoking prevention programs effective? The Waterloo study.社会心理吸烟预防项目有效吗?滑铁卢研究。
J Behav Med. 1985 Mar;8(1):37-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00845511.
9
Social influences approach to smoking prevention: the effects of videotape delivery with and without same-age peer leader participation.预防吸烟的社会影响方法:有无同龄同伴领袖参与的录像带传播效果。
Addict Behav. 1990;15(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90004-h.
10
A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up.一种预防药物滥用的认知行为方法:一年随访
Addict Behav. 1990;15(1):47-63. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90006-j.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11-21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴主导的干预措施预防11至21岁年轻人吸烟、饮酒和/或吸毒:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):391-407. doi: 10.1111/add.13224.
2
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.
3
Influence of a family program on adolescent smoking and drinking prevalence.

本文引用的文献

1
Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents.唾液硫氰酸盐:青少年吸烟的一种化学指标。
Am J Public Health. 1981 Dec;71(12):1320-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.12.1320.
2
The Minnesota smoking prevention program: a seventh-grade health curriculum supplement.明尼苏达吸烟预防项目:七年级健康课程补充材料
J Sch Health. 1981 Nov;51(9):611-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1981.tb02246.x.
3
Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking.青少年吸烟自我报告的有效性。
一项家庭计划对青少年吸烟和饮酒流行率的影响。
Prev Sci. 2002 Mar;3(1):35-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1014619325968.
4
Influence of a family-directed program on adolescent cigarette and alcohol cessation.一项家庭导向项目对青少年戒烟和戒酒的影响。
Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):227-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1026503313188.
5
The influence of a family program on adolescent tobacco and alcohol use.一个家庭项目对青少年烟草和酒精使用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):604-10. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.604.
6
Development and evaluation of an interactive CD-ROM refusal skills program to prevent youth substance use: "refuse to use".用于预防青少年药物使用的交互式光盘拒绝技巧项目“拒绝使用”的开发与评估
J Behav Med. 2000 Feb;23(1):59-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1005420304147.
7
Trends in adolescent cigarette use: the diffusion of daily smoking.青少年吸烟趋势:每日吸烟的传播情况
J Behav Med. 1999 Aug;22(4):379-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1018778120140.
8
Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature.与青少年吸烟相关的社会心理因素:文献综述
Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):409-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.409.
9
The effectiveness of a tobacco prevention program with adolescents living in a tobacco-producing region.一项针对生活在烟草产区的青少年的烟草预防项目的成效。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1862-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.12.1862.
10
Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents.一项基于社区的预防项目对减少高危青少年药物使用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):944-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.944.
Int J Addict. 1982 Oct;17(7):1131-6. doi: 10.3109/10826088209056345.
4
Measurement of adolescent smoking behavior: rationale and methods.青少年吸烟行为的测量:基本原理与方法。
J Behav Med. 1984 Mar;7(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00845351.
5
The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial approach to smoking prevention.日程安排形式和强化课程对预防吸烟的广谱心理社会方法的影响。
J Behav Med. 1983 Dec;6(4):359-79. doi: 10.1007/BF00846324.
6
The bogus pipeline revisited: the use of the threat of detection as a means of increasing self-reports of tobacco use.再探虚假管道技术:利用被发现的威胁作为增加烟草使用自我报告的一种手段。
J Appl Psychol. 1985 Nov;70(4):789-92.
7
Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: a review of findings.预防吸烟的社会心理方法:研究结果综述
Health Psychol. 1985;4(5):449-88. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.5.449.
8
The measurement of substance use among adolescents: when is the 'bogus pipeline' method needed?青少年物质使用情况的测量:何时需要采用“虚假管道”法?
Addict Behav. 1987;12(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90032-3.
9
Do smoking prevention programs really work? Attrition and the internal and external validity of an evaluation of a refusal skills training program.吸烟预防项目真的有效吗?拒绝技巧培训项目评估中的损耗以及内部和外部效度。
J Behav Med. 1987 Apr;10(2):159-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00846424.
10
The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: a reexamination of the bogus pipeline procedure.青少年吸烟自我报告的有效性:对虚假管道程序的重新审视。
Addict Behav. 1987;12(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90003-7.