Rondon-Ramos Antonio, Martinez-Calderon Javier, Diaz-Cerrillo Juan Luis, Rivas-Ruiz Francisco, Ariza-Hurtado Gina Rocio, Clavero-Cano Susana, Luque-Suarez Alejandro
Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Distrito de Atención Primaria Costa del Sol, U.G.C. Las Lagunas, 29650 Mijas, Málaga, Spain.
Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Fisioterapia, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 11;9(7):2195. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072195.
Self-efficacy beliefs are associated with less physical impairment and pain intensity in people with chronic pain. Interventions that build self-efficacy beliefs may foster behavioral changes among this population. A non-randomized trial has been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) plus usual care in modifying self-efficacy beliefs, pain intensity, pain interference and analgesics consumption in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants were allocated to an experimental (PNE plus usual care, 49) and a control (usual care alone, 51) group. The primary outcome was self-efficacy beliefs (Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale), and the secondary outcomes were pain intensity, pain interference (Graded Chronic Pain Scale) and analgesics consumption. The participant's pain knowledge (revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire) after PNE intervention was also assessed to analyze its influence on every outcome measure. All the outcome measures were assessed at the baseline and at four-week and four-month follow-ups. PNE plus usual care was more effective than usual care alone to increase self-efficacy beliefs and decrease pain intensity and pain interference at all follow-up points. No differences between groups were found in terms of analgesics consumption. Knowledge of pain neurophysiology did not modify the effects of PNE plus usual care in any of the outcome measures. These results should be taken with caution because of the non-randomized nature of this design, the limited follow-ups and the uncertainty of the presence of clinical changes in self-efficacy for participants. Larger, methodological sound trials are needed.
自我效能信念与慢性疼痛患者较轻的身体损伤和疼痛强度相关。建立自我效能信念的干预措施可能会促进这一人群的行为改变。一项非随机试验已开展,以评估疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)加常规护理在改变慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的自我效能信念、疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和镇痛药使用方面的效果。参与者被分配到一个试验组(PNE加常规护理,49人)和一个对照组(仅常规护理,51人)。主要结局是自我效能信念(慢性疼痛自我效能量表),次要结局是疼痛强度、疼痛干扰(分级慢性疼痛量表)和镇痛药使用。还评估了PNE干预后参与者的疼痛知识(修订后的疼痛神经生理学问卷),以分析其对每个结局指标的影响。所有结局指标均在基线、四周和四个月随访时进行评估。在所有随访点,PNE加常规护理在增强自我效能信念、降低疼痛强度和疼痛干扰方面比仅常规护理更有效。两组在镇痛药使用方面未发现差异。疼痛神经生理学知识在任何结局指标中均未改变PNE加常规护理的效果。由于该设计的非随机性质、有限的随访以及参与者自我效能临床变化存在的不确定性,这些结果应谨慎看待。需要开展更大规模、方法严谨的试验。