Irarrázaval Leonor
Section Phenomenological Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Department, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Centro de Atención Psicológica, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Sede Talca, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01399. eCollection 2020.
This article seeks to clarify the way in which phenomenology is conceptualized and applied in empirical research in psychiatry and psychology, emphasizing the suitability of qualitative research. It will address the "What," "Why," and "How" of phenomenological interviews, providing not only preliminary answers but also a critical analysis and pointing to future directions for research. The questions it asks are: First, what makes an interview phenomenological? What are phenomenological interviews used for in empirical research in psychiatry and psychology? Second, why do we carry out phenomenological interviews with patients? Is merely contrasting phenomenological hypotheses or concepts enough to do justice to the patients' involvement? Third, how should we conduct phenomenological interviews with patients? How can we properly perform analysis in empirical phenomenological research in psychiatry and psychology? In its conclusion, the article attempts to go a step beyond these methodological questions, highlighting the "bigger picture": namely, the phenomenological scientific paradigm and its core philosophical claim of reality as mind-dependent.
本文旨在阐明现象学在精神病学和心理学实证研究中的概念化方式及应用,强调定性研究的适用性。它将探讨现象学访谈的“是什么”“为什么”和“如何做”,不仅给出初步答案,还进行批判性分析并指出未来研究方向。它提出的问题是:第一,什么样的访谈是现象学访谈?现象学访谈在精神病学和心理学实证研究中有何用途?第二,我们为什么要对患者进行现象学访谈?仅仅对比现象学假设或概念是否足以公正对待患者的参与?第三,我们应如何对患者进行现象学访谈?在精神病学和心理学实证现象学研究中如何进行恰当的分析?在结论部分,本文试图超越这些方法论问题,突出“更宏观的图景”:即现象学科学范式及其关于现实依赖于心灵的核心哲学主张。