Suppr超能文献

常见光固化设备不同固化模式的辐照度:一项研究。

Irradiance of Different Curing Modes of Common Light Cure Devices: An Study.

作者信息

Nassar Hani M, Almutairi Mahmoud, Makhdom Albaraa

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Al-Farabi Private College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Mar 10;10(2):177-182. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_496_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to test the irradiance values of different curing modes of commonly available light cure devices (LCDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An investigation was carried out to compare the irradiance output of 10 brands of LCDs available in Saudi Arabia measured using a digital radiometer. Values were recorded for three time points when applicable (0, 10, and 20s). This technique was repeated five times for each LCD. Normal, high-intensity, and soft-start modes were evaluated for all brands with the features available. Irradiance values between brands were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni method. Changes in irradiance between different time points were analyzed using one sample test for normal and high-intensity modes and using paired test for soft-start mode. All comparisons were carried out at 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

The highest values were reported for Ortholux Luminous, Elipar DeepCure-S, Elipar DeepCure, and KaVo mini-LED with values above 1000 mW/cm. All LCDs showed values above 600 mW/cm. Three LCDs had high-intensity mode and only one device had soft-start mode. Changes over the different time points were not statistically significant exept for soft-start mode.

CONCLUSION

All tested LCDs had irradiance values sufficient for adequate polymerization of resin composite. Only four of these are capable of curing bulk-fill composites.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试常用光固化设备(LCD)不同固化模式的辐照度值。

材料与方法

进行一项调查,以比较沙特阿拉伯市场上10个品牌LCD使用数字辐射计测量的辐照度输出。在适用的三个时间点(0、10和20秒)记录数值。每个LCD重复该技术五次。对所有具有相应功能的品牌评估正常、高强度和软启动模式。使用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni方法分析不同品牌之间的辐照度值。对正常和高强度模式使用单样本检验分析不同时间点之间辐照度的变化,对软启动模式使用配对检验分析。所有比较均在0.05显著性水平下进行。

结果

Ortholux Luminous、Elipar DeepCure-S、Elipar DeepCure和KaVo mini-LED的辐照度值最高,均高于1000 mW/cm²。所有LCD的辐照度值均高于600 mW/cm²。三个LCD具有高强度模式,只有一个设备具有软启动模式。除软启动模式外,不同时间点的变化无统计学意义。

结论

所有测试的LCD的辐照度值足以使树脂复合材料充分聚合。其中只有四个能够固化大块充填复合材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/125c/7339987/53ee2d7a8377/JISPCD-10-177-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验