Dianat Shokoufeh, Silverstein Ilana A, Holt Kelsey, Steinauer Jody, Dehlendorf Christine
University of California, San Francisco, Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences. Address: 1001 Potrero Ave, Ward 22, San Francisco, CA 94110.
University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave, Ward 22, San Francisco, CA 94110.
Contracept X. 2020 Jun 16;2:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100029. eCollection 2020.
Abortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling.
In 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes.
We achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion.
Discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma.
Mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.
堕胎在美国是常见的健康经历,但却与主流医疗保健相隔离。为了就临床医生如何打破这些隔离、使堕胎话题正常化以及潜在地改善患者体验和避孕决策提供指导,我们试图了解患者在避孕咨询期间对讨论堕胎的态度。
2018年,我们对从加利福尼亚州两个政治立场不同地区的初级保健诊所招募的育龄妇女进行了深入的半结构化访谈。我们探讨了临床医生在避孕咨询期间提及堕胎的可接受性、偏好及影响。通过定向内容分析,我们对访谈记录进行编码以找出归纳和演绎主题。
在进行49次访谈后我们实现了主题饱和。受访者在生育史、种族/民族、宗教信仰和堕胎态度方面各不相同。对堕胎态度各异的参与者表示,在避孕咨询期间提及堕胎,若以专注于提供信息的非指导性方式进行,通常被视为可接受的,甚至是有帮助的。对一些患者而言,提及堕胎可能会减少堕胎污名并有助于避孕决策。谨慎关注非评判性的沟通方式对于防范潜在的避孕强制至关重要。
在这一多样化人群中,在避孕咨询期间讨论堕胎是可接受的,我们的研究结果提出了优化此类咨询的方法。结合对临床医生观点的研究,我们的研究结果可为以患者为中心的避孕咨询方法的发展提供参考,这种方法将堕胎纳入其中,以促进患者护理并减少污名。
在避孕咨询期间提及堕胎,即使是在那些认为堕胎在所有或大多数情况下都应非法的患者中,若以专注于提供信息的非指导性方式进行,对患者而言可能是可接受的,甚至是有帮助的。对一些患者来说,提及堕胎可能会减少堕胎污名并有助于避孕决策。