Suppr超能文献

美国南部妊娠选择咨询和转介中的种族差异。

Racial disparities in pregnancy options counseling and referral in the US South.

机构信息

Evaluation Department, Provide, Inc., Round Rock, Texas, USA.

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14049. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine racial variation in receipt of counseling and referral for pregnancy options (abortion, adoption, and parenting) following pregnancy confirmation. Equitable offering of such information is a professional and ethical obligation and an opportunity to prevent racial disparities in maternal and child health.

DATA SOURCE

Primary data from patients at southern United States publicly funded family planning clinics, October 2018-June 2019.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients at 14 clinics completed a survey about their experiences with pregnancy options counseling and referral following a positive pregnancy test. The primary predictor variable was patients' self-reported racial identity. Outcomes included discussion of pregnancy options, referral for those options, and for support services.

DATA COLLECTION

Data from eligible patients with non-missing information for key variables (n = 313) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, χ tests, and multivariable logistic regression.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Patients were largely Black (58%), uninsured (64%), and 18-29 years of age (80%). Intention to continue pregnancy and receipt of prenatal care referral did not differ significantly among Black as compared to non-Black patients. However, Black patients had a higher likelihood of wanting an abortion or adoption referral and not receiving one (abortion: marginal effect [ME] = 7.68%, p = 0.037; adjusted ME [aME] = 9.02%, p = 0.015; adoption: ME = 7.06%, p = 0.031; aME = 8.42%, p = 0.011). Black patients intending to end their pregnancies had a lower probability of receiving an abortion referral than non-Black patients (ME = -22.37%, p = 0.004; aME = -19.69%, p = 0.023). In the fully adjusted model, Black patients also had a higher probability of wanting access to care resources (including transportation, childcare, and financial support) and not receiving them (aME = 5.38%, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical interactions surrounding pregnancy confirmation provide critical opportunities to discuss options, coordinate care, and mitigate risk, yet are susceptible to systemic bias. These findings add to limited evidence around pregnancy counseling and referral disparities. Ongoing assessment of pregnancy counseling and referral disparities can provide insight into organizational strengths or the potential to increase structural equity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在确认怀孕后,不同种族获得怀孕选择咨询和转介的情况,这些选择包括堕胎、收养和育儿。公平提供此类信息是专业和道德上的义务,也是防止母婴健康方面种族差异的机会。

数据来源

2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月,美国南部公共资助计划生育诊所的患者的原始数据。

研究设计

14 家诊所的患者完成了一项关于他们在阳性妊娠试验后接受妊娠选择咨询和转介的经验的调查。主要预测变量是患者自我报告的种族身份。结果包括讨论妊娠选择、为这些选择和支持服务转介。

数据收集

对符合关键变量(n=313)非缺失信息的合格患者的数据进行了描述性统计分析、χ 检验和多变量逻辑回归分析。

主要发现

患者主要为黑人(58%)、无保险(64%)和 18-29 岁(80%)。与非黑人患者相比,黑人患者继续妊娠和获得产前护理转介的意愿没有显著差异。然而,黑人患者更有可能希望获得堕胎或收养转介,但实际上并未获得(堕胎:边际效应[ME]为 7.68%,p=0.037;调整后的 ME[aME]为 9.02%,p=0.015;收养:ME 为 7.06%,p=0.031;aME 为 8.42%,p=0.011)。打算终止妊娠的黑人患者获得堕胎转介的可能性低于非黑人患者(ME=-22.37%,p=0.004;aME=-19.69%,p=0.023)。在完全调整后的模型中,黑人患者更有可能希望获得护理资源(包括交通、儿童保育和经济支持),但实际上并未获得(aME=5.38%,p=0.019)。

结论

围绕妊娠确认的临床互动提供了讨论选择、协调护理和降低风险的关键机会,但容易受到系统偏见的影响。这些发现增加了关于妊娠咨询和转介差异的有限证据。对妊娠咨询和转介差异的持续评估可以深入了解组织优势或增加结构公平的潜力。

相似文献

4
Pregnancy testing and counseling.妊娠检测与咨询。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;36(3):681-96. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36691-3.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of a Pregnancy Options Counseling Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.针对儿科住院医师的妊娠选择咨询课程评估
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Mar;76(3):475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
4
Reproductive Justice as a Framework for Abortion Care.生殖正义作为堕胎护理的框架。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;66(4):655-664. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000811. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

7
Passage of abortion ban and women's accurate understanding of abortion legality.堕胎禁令的通过和女性对堕胎合法性的准确理解。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):63.e1-63.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验