Suppr超能文献

力量型和弹道式抗阻训练方案对卧推成绩和投掷速度的影响。

Changes in bench press performance and throwing velocity after strength-oriented and ballistic resistance training programs.

机构信息

Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (UCSC), Concepción, Chile.

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, The Research Centre, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia -

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Nov;60(11):1423-1430. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11011-9. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effect of two upper-body resistance training programs (strength-oriented vs. ballistic) on bench press (BP) performance and handball throwing velocity (HTV).

METHODS

Thirty resistance-trained males were randomly assigned to a strength-oriented training group (STG) or a ballistic training group (BTG). The study consisted of 11 sessions: 2 pre-tests (week 1), 8 training sessions (weeks 2-5), and 1 post-test (week 6). The STG performed the BP at the 70-90% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM), and the BTG the BP throw at the 40% of 1RM. BP performance (BP 1RM and maximum velocity achieved against 20 kg [BP20]) and HTV were assessed before and after training.

RESULTS

The STG enhanced BP 1RM (effect size [ES]=0.24) but not BP20 (ES=0.21) or HTV (ES=0.10). The BTG enhanced BP20 (ES=0.63) but not BP1RM (ES=0.27) or HTV (ES=0.02). HTV was not significantly correlated with the BP 1RM (r≤0.181) or BP20 (r≤0.220).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that a short-term RT program based exclusively on the BP exercise performed against either heavy (strength-oriented) or light loads (ballistic) is not effective to increase HTV in resistance-trained men with little handball experience.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较两种上半身抗阻训练方案(力量型与冲击型)对卧推(BP)表现和手球投掷速度(HTV)的影响。

方法

30 名有抗阻训练经验的男性被随机分配到力量型训练组(STG)或冲击型训练组(BTG)。研究包括 11 次训练:2 次预测试(第 1 周),8 次训练(第 2-5 周)和 1 次后测试(第 6 周)。STG 以 70-90%的 1 次重复最大重量(1RM)进行 BP,BTG 以 40%的 1RM 进行 BP 投掷。训练前后评估 BP 表现(BP 1RM 和 20kg 对抗最大速度[BP20])和 HTV。

结果

STG 提高了 BP 1RM(效果大小[ES]=0.24),但没有提高 BP20(ES=0.21)或 HTV(ES=0.10)。BTG 提高了 BP20(ES=0.63),但没有提高 BP1RM(ES=0.27)或 HTV(ES=0.02)。HTV 与 BP 1RM(r≤0.181)或 BP20(r≤0.220)均无显著相关性。

结论

这些结果表明,短期 RT 方案仅基于重物(力量型)或轻物(冲击型)进行的 BP 练习,对手球经验较少的抗阻训练男性来说,对提高 HTV 效果不佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验