Neuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002 Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002 Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 6;15(2):285. doi: 10.3390/nu15020285.
This study examined the effects of four weeks of resistance training combined with time-restricted eating (TRE) vs. habitual diet on fat and fat-free mass as well as maximum and explosive force production in healthy, trained participants (18 males, aged 23.7 ± 2.6 years). The order of dieting was randomized and counterbalanced, and the participants served as their own controls. TRE involved an 8-h eating window and non-TRE involved a habitual meal pattern. Participants completed performance strength tests and body composition scans at baseline and post-intervention. The participants followed a structured training routine during each dietary intervention (four sets of maximum repetitions at 85% 1RM in five dynamic exercises, three times/week). Both interventions elicited deceases in fat mass (p < 0.05) but not in fat-free mass. After training (controlling for baseline values as covariates), non-TRE was compatible with better lower body jump performance than TRE (p < 0.05). Conversely, training with TRE elicited higher values in terms of peak force and dynamic strength index at the level of the upper body (p < 0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that there were no differences in fat mass and fat-free mass changes between interventions in already trained young males. Additionally, while the combination of TRE and resistance training might be beneficial for individuals focusing on developing high-speed strength performance at the upper body level, this is not applicable to those focusing on training the lower body.
本研究旨在探讨四周的抗阻训练结合限时进食(TRE)与习惯性饮食对健康、有训练基础的参与者的体脂和去脂体重以及最大力量和爆发力的影响(18 名男性,年龄 23.7±2.6 岁)。节食的顺序是随机和平衡的,参与者作为自己的对照。TRE 涉及 8 小时的进食窗口,而非 TRE 涉及习惯性的进餐模式。参与者在基线和干预后进行了力量表现测试和身体成分扫描。在每次饮食干预期间,参与者都遵循了结构化的训练方案(五项动态运动中每组最大重复次数为 85% 1RM,每周三次)。两种干预都导致体脂减少(p<0.05),但去脂体重没有变化。经过训练(将基线值作为协变量进行控制),与 TRE 相比,非 TRE 更有利于下半身跳跃表现(p<0.05)。相反,TRE 联合抗阻训练在上肢水平产生了更高的峰值力和动态力量指数值(p<0.05)。因此,可以得出结论,在已经训练有素的年轻男性中,两种干预措施在体脂和去脂体重变化方面没有差异。此外,虽然 TRE 结合抗阻训练可能对专注于发展上肢高速力量表现的个体有益,但这不适用于专注于下肢训练的个体。