Stamates Amy L, Todaro Sabrina M, Sherman Anna L, Rothstein Melissa, López Dahianna
Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island.
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Aug;33(4):361-370. doi: 10.1037/pha0000779. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
Impulsivity and individual differences in alcohol sensitivity (e.g., subjective response to alcohol) have been related to alcohol use behaviors, but scant research has examined how these two constructs are related to each other. Consequently, this pilot study aimed (1) to examine associations between impulsivity domains (impulsive action, impulsive choice, and impulsive personality features) and alcohol sensitivity during alcohol administration in the laboratory; (2) to test daily associations between impulsivity domains and sensitivity to reward during ecological momentary assessment (EMA); and (3) to explore consistency between alcohol sensitivity scores in the lab and EMA. Participants ( = 26; 38.5% male, 61.5% female) were students (graduate and undergraduate) who engaged in recent (past-month) alcohol use and heavy drinking in the past 6 months. Participants completed an in-person alcohol administration session followed by 10 days of EMA. For Aim 1, results indicated that individuals with a greater lack of perseverance reported greater cravings and willingness to drive during the alcohol administration session. Negative and positive urgency were positively associated with liking the alcoholic beverage. For Aim 2, within-person associations revealed that greater than usual lack of premeditation was associated with greater craving while drinking, and greater than usual lack of perseverance was related to less willingness to drive. For Aim 3, subjective effects for liking, craving, and stimulation scores were greater during the EMA portion as compared to the laboratory session. Our findings suggested that individual differences in some impulsive personality features played a role in the motivation to consume alcohol in the laboratory and real world. Future research should replicate these pilot findings and expand on contextual factors that may be driving the present study's associations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
冲动性与酒精敏感性的个体差异(例如,对酒精的主观反应)已被证明与饮酒行为有关,但很少有研究探讨这两个概念之间的关系。因此,这项初步研究旨在:(1)检验冲动性领域(冲动行为、冲动选择和冲动人格特征)与实验室饮酒期间酒精敏感性之间的关联;(2)在生态瞬时评估(EMA)期间测试冲动性领域与奖励敏感性之间的日常关联;(3)探索实验室和EMA中酒精敏感性分数之间的一致性。参与者(n = 26;38.5%为男性,61.5%为女性)是近期(过去一个月)饮酒且在过去6个月内有酗酒行为的学生(研究生和本科生)。参与者完成了一次现场饮酒实验,随后进行了10天的EMA。对于目标1,结果表明,在饮酒实验期间,缺乏毅力程度较高的个体报告有更强烈的渴望和驾车意愿。消极紧迫感和积极紧迫感与喜欢酒精饮料呈正相关。对于目标2,个体内部的关联显示,比平时更缺乏预谋与饮酒时更强烈的渴望有关,比平时更缺乏毅力与驾车意愿较低有关。对于目标3,与实验室实验部分相比,EMA部分中喜欢、渴望和兴奋分数的主观效应更大。我们的研究结果表明,某些冲动人格特征的个体差异在实验室和现实世界中饮酒动机方面发挥了作用。未来的研究应重复这些初步研究结果,并扩展可能推动本研究关联的背景因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)