• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
ADAPT study: adaptation of evidence-informed complex population health interventions for implementation and/or re-evaluation in new contexts: protocol for a Delphi consensus exercise to develop guidance.ADAPT 研究:将循证复杂人群健康干预措施进行改编,以在新环境中实施和/或重新评估:制定指导意见的德尔菲共识意见征询的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e038965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038965.
2
Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance.适应新环境的循证复杂人群健康干预措施:指导意见的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 17;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5.
3
How can we adapt complex population health interventions for new contexts? Progressing debates and research priorities.我们如何使复杂的人群健康干预措施适应新的环境?推进相关辩论和研究重点。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jan;75(1):40-45. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214468. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
4
Adapting evidence-informed population health interventions for new contexts: a scoping review of current practice.使基于证据的人群健康干预措施适用于新环境:当前实践的范围综述
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00668-9.
5
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架:差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Consensus on the exercise and dosage variables of an exercise training programme for chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.慢性非特异性颈痛运动训练方案的运动和剂量变量共识:一项国际电子 Delphi 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e037656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037656.
8
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: a framework for producers and users of evidence.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:证据生产者和使用者的框架
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar;13(3):1-59. doi: 10.3310/JTYW6582.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
An expert consensus on the most effective components of integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for lifestyle behaviour change: protocol for an online modified Delphi study.针对生活方式行为改变的综合动机性访谈和认知行为疗法最有效的组成部分的专家共识:在线改良德尔菲研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):e088988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088988.

引用本文的文献

1
International expert opinion on the considerations for combining vosoritide and limb surgery: a modified delphi study.国际专家关于 vosoritide 与肢体手术联合应用的考虑因素的意见:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Sep 17;19(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03236-4.
2
A qualitative evaluation of the pathway for eating disorders and autism developed from clinical experience (PEACE): clinicians' perspective.基于临床经验制定的饮食失调与自闭症诊疗路径的质性评估(PEACE):临床医生视角
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 4;15:1332441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1332441. eCollection 2024.
3
The Case for Assessing and Reporting on Facilitator Fidelity: Introducing the Fidelity of Implementation in Parenting Programs Guideline.评估与报告促进者忠诚度的理由:引入育儿项目实施忠诚度指南
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s43477-023-00092-5. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
4
Characteristics and Components of Self-Management Interventions for Improving Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.改善癌症幸存者生活质量的自我管理干预措施的特征与组成部分:一项系统综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;16(1):14. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010014.
5
Innovations in implementing a health systems response to violence against women in 3 tertiary hospitals of Maharashtra India: Improving provider capacity and facility readiness.印度马哈拉施特拉邦3家三级医院针对暴力侵害妇女行为实施卫生系统应对措施的创新:提高医疗服务提供者的能力和设施准备情况。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jan 6;3:26334895211067988. doi: 10.1177/26334895211067988. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Evaluation of word embedding models to extract and predict surgical data in breast cancer.评估词嵌入模型以提取和预测乳腺癌手术数据。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Nov 16;22(Suppl 14):631. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-05038-6.
7
Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors.适应新环境的人群健康干预措施:定性访谈了解研究人员、资助者和期刊编辑的经验、实践和挑战。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 26;12(10):e066451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066451.
8
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架:差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
9
Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.适应新环境的干预措施——ADAPT 指南。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1679.
10
The what, why and when of adapting interventions for new contexts: A qualitative study of researchers, funders, journal editors and practitioners' understandings.适应干预措施以适应新环境的意义、原因和时机:研究人员、资助者、期刊编辑和实践者理解的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254020. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance.适应新环境的循证复杂人群健康干预措施:指导意见的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 17;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5.
2
Using an Online, Modified Delphi Approach to Engage Patients and Caregivers in Determining the Patient-Centeredness of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Care Considerations.采用在线改良 Delphi 法让患者和照护者参与确定杜氏肌营养不良症照护考虑因素的以患者为中心程度。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):1019-1031. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19883631. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.使用在线改良德尔菲法让患者和其他利益相关者参与临床实践指南制定的实用考虑因素。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00389-4.
4
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare.关于如何制定复杂干预措施以改善健康和医疗保健的指南。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
5
When and how do 'effective' interventions need to be adapted and/or re-evaluated in new contexts? The need for guidance.在新环境中,“有效”干预措施何时以及如何需要调整和/或重新评估?对指导的需求。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):481-482. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210840. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
7
Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.现实主义随机对照试验:一种评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.在线专家小组讨论:一项可行性和实验可重复性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 23;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174.
9
Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies.运用德尔菲技术确定临床试验的疗效指标:基于现有研究的系统评价对未来的建议
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.
10
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.健康研究报告规范开发者指南。
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.

ADAPT 研究:将循证复杂人群健康干预措施进行改编,以在新环境中实施和/或重新评估:制定指导意见的德尔菲共识意见征询的方案

ADAPT study: adaptation of evidence-informed complex population health interventions for implementation and/or re-evaluation in new contexts: protocol for a Delphi consensus exercise to develop guidance.

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK

The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Public Health Interventions, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e038965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038965.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038965
PMID:32690750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375505/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Complex population health interventions that are effective in one context may not be effective elsewhere, and may even be harmful. As such, an intervention may require adaptation to ensure it fits with a new context. To date, there is no overarching guidance to help researchers to adapt and evaluate interventions in new contexts, and no criteria to support research funders or journals assess proposed or reported adaptations or evaluation. There is limited assistance for policy-makers and practitioners to decide if evidence-informed interventions are appropriate to their context, or if adaptation and further evaluation is needed. This Delphi exercise will contribute to the development of guidance for these communities to support the adaptation, implementation and/or re-evaluation of complex population health interventions in new contexts.

METHODS

We will conduct a Delphi consensus exercise to gather expert opinion from researchers, research funders, journal editors and policy-makers. Expert opinion will be sought on: appropriate definitions and concepts, identifying key methodological considerations and establishing adaptations and processes to be undertaken during adaptation of complex population health interventions in new contexts.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for the Delphi exercise has been obtained from the University of Glasgow and and the RAND institutional research board. Dissemination of the results of this study will be through peer-reviewed publications, workshops at national and international conferences, and a summary of the guidance developed for key organisations and stakeholders.

摘要

简介

在一种情况下有效的复杂人群健康干预措施在其他情况下可能无效,甚至可能有害。因此,干预措施可能需要进行调整,以确保其适应当地的新环境。迄今为止,尚无全面的指导意见帮助研究人员在新环境中调整和评估干预措施,也没有标准来支持研究资助者或期刊评估拟议或报告的调整或评估。决策者和从业人员在决定证据为基础的干预措施是否适应当地情况,或是否需要调整和进一步评估方面,所获得的帮助有限。这项德尔菲专家咨询研究将有助于为这些群体制定指导意见,以支持在新环境中调整、实施和/或重新评估复杂人群健康干预措施。

方法

我们将进行一项德尔菲共识研究,以从研究人员、研究资助者、期刊编辑和决策者那里收集专家意见。将征求专家对以下方面的意见:适当的定义和概念、确定关键方法学考虑因素以及在新环境中调整复杂人群健康干预措施时应进行的调整和流程。

伦理和传播

德尔菲研究的伦理批准已获得格拉斯哥大学和兰德机构研究委员会的批准。本研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物、在国家和国际会议上的研讨会以及为主要组织和利益攸关方制定的指导摘要进行传播。