运用德尔菲技术确定临床试验的疗效指标：基于现有研究的系统评价对未来的建议
Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies.
机构信息
University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.
Abstract
Ian Sinha and colleagues advise that when using the Delphi process to develop core outcome sets for clinical trials, patients and clinicians be involved, researchers and facilitators avoid imposing their views on participants, and attrition of participants be minimized.
摘要
伊恩·辛哈（Ian Sinha）及其同事建议，在使用德尔菲（Delphi）流程制定临床试验的核心结局集时，应让患者和临床医生参与其中，研究人员和协调人员避免将自己的观点强加给参与者，并尽量减少参与者的流失。
相似文献
1
Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies.运用德尔菲技术确定临床试验的疗效指标：基于现有研究的系统评价对未来的建议
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.
2
Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.基于中医的紧张型头痛治疗核心结局集的制定：德尔菲共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 5;14:e63481. doi: 10.2196/63481.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准：用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
5
Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol.为轻度认知障碍患者的干预措施制定核心结局集：研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e090818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090818.
6
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence.骨关节炎研究学会国际联盟（OARSI）关于髋和膝骨关节炎管理的建议，第一部分：对现有治疗指南的批判性评估及当前研究证据的系统评价
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):981-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
7
Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.基于循证方法治疗慢性下腰痛的系统评价方法学。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S10-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef8ee.
8
Development of a value-based healthcare burns core set for adult burn care.基于价值的成人烧伤护理核心集的制定。
Burns. 2024 Sep;50(7):1925-1934. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.03.038. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局：最新综述与差距识别
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0168403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168403. eCollection 2016.
10
Best Practices for Chiropractic Care for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Consensus Update.老年人整脊治疗的最佳实践：系统评价与共识更新
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 May;40(4):217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions: An update and validation study.基于音乐的干预措施报告指南：一项更新与验证研究。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Sep;14(3):101199. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101199. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Establishing a core outcome set for creatine transporter deficiency and guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency.建立肌酸转运体缺乏症和胍基乙酸甲基转移酶缺乏症的核心结局指标集。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 7;20(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03900-3.
3
Protocol for developing a core outcome set for medicines safety at transitions of care: a systematic review, qualitative study and Delphi consensus.制定照护转接时药物安全核心结局集的方案：一项系统评价、定性研究及德尔菲共识法
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 1;15(7):e095343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095343.
4
Establishing core competencies for neonatology fellowship training in Syria: a modified Delphi study approach.确立叙利亚新生儿科住院医师培训的核心能力：一种改良的德尔菲研究方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):1123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07696-5.
5
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Spain and Barriers to Implementation: A Delphi Study.西班牙类风湿性关节炎患者自我报告结局量表的使用及实施障碍：一项德尔菲研究
Adv Ther. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03300-w.
6
Wildlife management and conservation in South Africa: informing legislative reform through expert consultation using the Policy Delphi methodology.南非的野生动物管理与保护：运用政策德尔菲法通过专家咨询为立法改革提供信息支持
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 30;12:1549222. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1549222. eCollection 2025.
7
Developing a core outcome set for gender-affirming healthcare in transgender and gender diverse adults in Sweden using the Delphi approach: a study protocol.采用德尔菲法为瑞典跨性别和性别多样化成年人制定性别确认医疗保健核心结局集：一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e098300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098300.
8
Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study.群组随机试验估计量框架共识扩展（CRT-估计量）的制定：一项国际德尔菲研究的结果
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 3:2025.07.03.25330799. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.03.25330799.
9
Outcome reporting in studies of paediatric achalasia: A systematic review.小儿贲门失弛缓症研究中的结果报告：一项系统评价。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Sep;81(3):523-529. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.70128. Epub 2025 Jun 22.
10
Core outcome set for research in necrotising soft tissue infection patients: an international, multidisciplinary, modified Delphi consensus study.坏死性软组织感染患者研究的核心结局集：一项国际多学科改良德尔菲共识研究
Diving Hyperb Med. 2025 Jun 30;55(2):91-103. doi: 10.28920/dhm55.2.91-103.
本文引用的文献
1
Patients' and clinicians' research priorities.患者和临床医生的研究重点。
Health Expect. 2011 Dec;14(4):439-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00648.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
2
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.随机对照试验中结局报告偏倚对一系列系统评价的影响。
BMJ. 2010 Feb 15;340:c365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c365.
3
Patient perspective on outcomes in rheumatology -- a position paper for OMERACT 9.患者对风湿病治疗结果的看法——一份面向OMERACT 9的立场文件
J Rheumatol. 2009 Sep;36(9):2067-70. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090359.
4
Patient involvement in health research: a contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxias.患者参与健康研究：对关于退行性共济失调治疗效果的系统评价的一项贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(6):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
5
Outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled corticosteroids for children with asthma are narrowly focussed on short term disease activity.针对哮喘儿童的吸入性皮质类固醇临床试验结果，主要集中在短期疾病活动方面。
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 17;4(7):e6276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006276.
6
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.关于研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚实证证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
7
Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: contributions from clinician and patient Delphi exercises.确定纤维肌痛的临床领域：临床医生和患者德尔菲法练习的贡献
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):952-60. doi: 10.1002/art.23826.
8
Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials.注册糖尿病试验中对患者重要的结局
JAMA. 2008 Jun 4;299(21):2543-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2543.
9
A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children.一项旨在确定在儿童临床试验中应测量哪些结果的研究的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 29;5(4):e96. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050096.
10
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews.规范临床试验和系统评价的结果。
Trials. 2007 Nov 26;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39.
Zotero 插件