• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。

Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.

机构信息

Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13179
PMID:33434404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8013488/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, one of the key components of many countries' strategies to reduce the spread of the virus is contact tracing.

OBJECTIVE

To explore public attitudes to a COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom.

SETTING

Online video-conferencing.

PARTICIPANTS

27 participants, UK residents aged 18 years and older.

METHODS

Qualitative study consisting of six focus groups carried out between 1st-12th May, 2020 (39-50 days into the UK 'lockdown').

RESULTS

Participants were divided as to whether or not they felt they would use the app. Analysis revealed five themes: (1) lack of information and misconceptions surrounding COVID-19 contact tracing apps; (2) concerns over privacy; (3) concerns over stigma; (4)concerns over uptake; and (5) contact tracing as the 'greater good'. Concerns over privacy, uptake and stigma were particularly significant amongst those stated they will not be using the app, and the view that the app is for the 'greater good' was particularly significant amongst those who stated they will be using the app. One of the most common misconceptions about the app was that it could allow users to specifically identify and map COVID-19 cases amongst their contacts and in their vicinity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our participants were torn over whether digital contact tracing is a good idea or not, and views were heavily influenced by moral reasoning.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patients were involved in this study. The public were not involved in the development of the research questions, research design or outcome measures. A pilot focus group with participants not included in the present paper was used to help test and refine the focus group questions. Summary results were disseminated via email to participants prior to publication for feedback and comment.

摘要

背景

在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多国家减少病毒传播策略的关键组成部分之一是接触者追踪。

目的

探索英国公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度。

设置

在线视频会议。

参与者

27 名参与者,年龄在 18 岁及以上的英国居民。

方法

2020 年 5 月 1 日至 12 日进行的六组焦点小组定性研究(英国“封锁”的第 39-50 天)。

结果

参与者对是否会使用该应用程序存在分歧。分析揭示了五个主题:(1)缺乏有关 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的信息和误解;(2)对隐私的担忧;(3)对污名的担忧;(4)对采用率的担忧;(5)接触者追踪是“更大的利益”。对隐私、采用率和污名的担忧在表示不会使用该应用程序的参与者中尤为重要,而认为该应用程序是为了“更大的利益”的观点在表示将使用该应用程序的参与者中尤为重要。关于该应用程序的最常见误解之一是,它可以让用户专门识别和绘制其联系人及其附近的 COVID-19 病例。

结论

我们的参与者对数字接触者追踪是否是一个好主意存在分歧,观点受到道德推理的严重影响。

患者或公众的贡献

本研究没有涉及患者。公众没有参与研究问题的制定、研究设计或结果衡量标准。在进行本研究之前,使用包含不在本论文中的参与者的试点焦点小组来帮助测试和完善焦点小组问题。总结结果在发表前通过电子邮件分发给参与者,以征求反馈和意见。

相似文献

1
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
3
Survey of Citizens' Preferences for Combined Contact Tracing App Features During a Pandemic: Conjoint Analysis.在大流行期间对公民对联合接触者追踪应用程序功能偏好的调查:联合分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 14;10:e53340. doi: 10.2196/53340.
4
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
5
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
6
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
7
Concerns and Misconceptions About the Australian Government's COVIDSafe App: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.对澳大利亚政府 COVIDSafe 应用的担忧和误解:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 4;6(4):e23081. doi: 10.2196/23081.
8
Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.美国人对 COVID-19 大流行期间隐私和监控的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242652. eCollection 2020.
9
To Use or Not to Use a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Mixed Methods Survey in Wales.使用还是不使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:威尔士的混合方法调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e29181. doi: 10.2196/29181.
10
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.

引用本文的文献

1
An Examination of Responses to COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Efforts in Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx Communities of Los Angeles.对洛杉矶黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区新冠病毒接触者追踪工作回应的考察
Health Equity. 2024 Aug 7;8(1):493-504. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0243. eCollection 2024.
2
An individual's trust in government is a major determinant in the decision to voluntarily join a public health initiative.个人对政府的信任是决定是否自愿参与公共卫生倡议的一个主要因素。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Feb 14;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00671-x.
3
Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.
4
Exploring individual's public trust in the NHS Test and Trace System - A pragmatic reflexive thematic analysis.探索个体对英国国民医疗服务体系检测与追踪系统的公众信任——一项务实的反思性主题分析。
Internet Interv. 2024 Apr 4;36:100740. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100740. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
6
Perceptions of the Agency and Responsibility of the NHS COVID-19 App on Twitter: Critical Discourse Analysis.在 Twitter 上对国民保健署 (NHS) COVID-19 应用程序的看法:批评性话语分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 1;26:e50388. doi: 10.2196/50388.
7
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.
8
Critical reflections on three popular computational linguistic approaches to examine Twitter discourses.对三种用于研究推特话语的流行计算语言学方法的批判性反思。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Jan 30;9:e1211. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1211. eCollection 2023.
9
Acceptability and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Applications: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia of the Tawakkalna Application.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序的可接受性与有效性:以沙特阿拉伯的“塔瓦卡尔纳”应用程序为例
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35041. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Views and Needs of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Closed-Circuit Television, Proximity Trackers, and Access Cards to Facilitate COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Schools: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups and Interviews.学生、家长和教师对闭路电视、近距离追踪器及门禁卡以助力学校新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法与需求:焦点小组和访谈的主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 22;7:e44592. doi: 10.2196/44592.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
2
Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间社交距离和社交隔离的看法和体验:一项基于英国的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e039334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334.
3
Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19).接触者追踪在控制 2019 年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)中的效果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):861-866. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214051. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
The Ethics of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Improve Public Health.对含糖饮料征税以改善公众健康的伦理问题。
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;8:110. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00110. eCollection 2020.
5
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among the General Public in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Cross-sectional Online Survey.美国和英国公众对2019冠状病毒病的认知与看法:一项横断面在线调查
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):157-160. doi: 10.7326/M20-0912. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
COVID-19 in Singapore-Current Experience: Critical Global Issues That Require Attention and Action.新加坡的2019冠状病毒病——当前情况:需要关注和行动的重大全球问题
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1243-1244. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2467.
8
Ethics of tobacco harm reduction from a liberal perspective.从自由主义视角看烟草危害降低的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2016 May;42(5):273-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102974. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
9
Liberalism and Public Health Ethics.自由主义与公共卫生伦理
Bioethics. 2016 Feb;30(2):96-108. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12163. Epub 2015 May 9.
10
Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.在线焦点小组作为一种在难以纳入的人群中收集数据的工具:来自儿科肿瘤学的实例
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Mar 3;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-15.