Department of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106215. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
We examined the prevalence of home smoking and vaping restrictions among US adults, and compared home policy differences for smoking and vaping among vapers, smokers, and dual users. Secondary data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 3 (2015-2016) with 28,148 adults were analyzed using weighted multivariable logistic regression models that account for complex sampling design to compare differences in home policies among non-users, vapers only, smokers only, and dual users. Compared to never-users, current vapers who were ex-smokers and dual users were more likely to allow home vaping (aOR = 11.06, 95% CI: 8.04-15.21; aOR = 6.44, 95% CI: 5.01-8.28) and smoking (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.19-2.22; aOR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.88-4.45). Current smokers were more likely to allow vaping (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 3.06-4.06) and smoking (aOR = 4.27, 95% CI: 3.73-4.89) inside the home than never-users. Current vapers who never smoked were more likely to allow vaping inside the home than never-users (aOR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.53-3.93). Vapers reported much lower rates of vape-free home policies relative to both their smoke-free home policies and to vape-free home policies among smokers. Vapers may be using e-cigarettes in hopes of harm reduction, but interpreting "harm reduction" as safe, thus exposing non-users in their homes to second- and thirdhand aerosols. This underscores the need to healthcare providers to extend intervention with vapers to include implementing vape-free home policies.
我们调查了美国成年人中家庭吸烟和蒸气吸烟限制的流行情况,并比较了蒸气烟使用者、吸烟者和双重使用者的家庭吸烟和蒸气吸烟政策差异。使用加权多变量逻辑回归模型对来自人口评估烟草和健康 (PATH) 研究波 3(2015-2016 年)的 28148 名成年人的二次数据进行了分析,这些模型考虑了复杂的抽样设计,以比较非使用者、仅蒸气烟使用者、仅吸烟者和双重使用者之间的家庭政策差异。与从不使用者相比,以前吸烟但现在是蒸气烟使用者和双重使用者的当前蒸气烟使用者更有可能允许在家中蒸气吸烟(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 11.06,95%置信区间[CI]:8.04-15.21;aOR = 6.44,95%CI:5.01-8.28)和吸烟(aOR = 1.62,95%CI:1.19-2.22;aOR = 3.58,95%CI:2.88-4.45)。当前吸烟者比从不使用者更有可能允许在家中蒸气吸烟(aOR = 3.53,95%CI:3.06-4.06)和吸烟(aOR = 4.27,95%CI:3.73-4.89)。从未吸烟的当前蒸气烟使用者比从不使用者更有可能允许在家中蒸气吸烟(aOR = 2.45,95%CI:1.53-3.93)。与他们的无烟家庭政策和吸烟者的无烟家庭政策相比,从未吸烟的蒸气烟使用者报告的蒸气限制家庭政策的比例要低得多。蒸气烟使用者可能希望通过减少伤害来使用电子烟,但将“减少伤害”解释为安全,从而使家中的非使用者暴露于二手和三手气溶胶中。这突显了医疗保健提供者的需求,即通过将蒸气烟使用者的干预措施扩展到实施无烟家庭政策来满足这一需求。